Spelling suggestions: "subject:"burface bpressure fluctuations"" "subject:"burface bpressure tluctuations""
1 |
Pressure Shielding Mechanisms in Bio-Inspired Unidirectional Canopy Surface TreatmentsNurani Hari, Nandita 27 June 2022 (has links)
Reduction of surface pressure fluctuations is desirable in various aerodynamic and hydrodynamic applications. Over the past few years, studies on canopy surface treatments have been conducted to investigate the fundamental mechanisms of surface pressure attenuation termed as pressure shielding. This work talks about the design, development and experimental testing of unidirectional canopy surface treatments which are evenly spaced arrays of streamwise rods placed parallel to the wall without an entrance condition. The canopy designs are based on surface treatments tested by Clark et al. (2014) inspired by the downy coating on owl wings. The main objective of the work is to establish fundamental physical and mathematical basis for treatments that shield aerodynamic surfaces from turbulent pressure fluctuations, while maintaining the wall-normal transport of momentum and low aerodynamic drag.
Experimental testing of these canopy treatments are performed in the Anechoic Wall-Jet facility at Virginia Tech. Different canopy configurations are designed to understand the effect of various geometric parameters on the surface pressure attenuation. The treatment is found to exhibit broadband reduction in the surface pressure spectrum. Attenuation develops in two frequency regions which scale differently depending on two different mechanisms.
Canopies seems to reduce the large-scale turbulent fluctuations up to nearly twice the height.
Semi-analytical model is developed to predict surface pressure spectra in a wall-jet and canopy flow. The rapid term model shows that the inflection in the streamwise mean velocity profile is the most dominant source of surface pressure fluctuations. Synchronized pressure and velocity measurements elucidate significant features of the sources that could be affecting surface pressure fluctuations. Overall, this study explores the qualitative and quantitative physics behind pressure shielding mechanism which find application particularly in trailing edge noise reduction. / Doctor of Philosophy / Unsteady pressure fluctuations originating from interaction of turbulent flow over surfaces often cause undesirable effects. Trailing edge noise in wind turbines and helicopter blades, cabin noise and interior wind noise are some of noise sources which originate from surface pressure fluctuations. Previous studies have demonstrated that surface treatments help in reducing the unsteady surface pressure fluctuations therefore shielding surfaces and this phenomenon is termed as 'Pressure Shielding'. These are surface treatments inspired from the downy coating on owl's wings.
This study is motivated by recent works conducted at Virginia Tech on experimental investigation of unidirectional canopy treatments. These are evenly spaced arrays of streamwise rods held horizontal at the downstream end. Most previous surface treatments contain some entrance condition such as steps, supports or gaps which effect the surface pressure measurements and disturb the incoming flow. In this study, the canopies are developed without any entrance condition therefore assist in capturing the fundamental mechanisms of the flow interaction with the canopy rods.
|
2 |
Wall Features of Wing-Body Junctions: Towards Noise ReductionOwens, David Elliot 16 August 2013 (has links)
Much research and experiments have gone into studying idealized wing-body junction flows and their impact on horseshoe vortex and wake formation. The vortices have been found to generate regions of high surface pressure fluctuations and turbulence that are detrimental to structural components and acoustics. With the focus in the military and commercial industry on reducing the acoustical impact of aircraft and their engines, very little research has been done to examine the potential impact wing-body junctions may have on acoustics, especially for high lifting bodies such as propellers. Two similar tests were conducted in the Virginia Tech Open Jet Wind Tunnel where boundary layer measurements, oil flow visualizations, acoustic linear array and surface pressure fluctuation measurements of a baseline Rood airfoil model and two novel junction fairing designs were all taken. Boundary layer measurements were taken at four locations along the front half of the flat plate and the profiles were shown to be all turbulent despite the low Reynolds number of the flow, (test 1: Re_"<1400, test 2: Re_"<550). Oil flow visualizations were taken and compared to those of previous researchers and the location of separation and line of low shear along with the maximum width of the wake and width of wake at the trailing edge all scaled relatively well with the Momentum Deficit Factor, defined for wing-body junction flows [Fleming, J. L., Simpson, R. L., Cowling, J. E. & Devenport, W. J., 1993. An Experimental Study of a Turbulent Wing-Body Junction and Wake Flow. Experiments in Fluids, Volume 14, pp. 366-378. ]. A linear microphone array was used to estimate the directivity of the facility acoustic background noise to be used to improve background subtraction methods for surface pressure fluctuation measurements. Surface pressure fluctuation spectra were taken ahead of the leading edge of the plate and along the surface of the models. These showed that the fairings reduced pressure fluctuations along the plate upstream of the leading edge, with fairing 1 reducing them to clean tunnel flow levels. On the surface of the models, the fairings tended to reduce low frequency (<1000Hz) pressure fluctuation peaks when compared to the baseline model and increase the pressure fluctuations in the high frequency range. Simple scaling arguments indicate that this spectral change may be more beneficial than detrimental as low frequency acoustics especially those between 800 Hz and 1200 Hz are the frequencies that humans perceive as the loudest noise levels. Scaling the frequencies measured to those of full scale applications using Strouhal numbers show that frequencies below 1000 Hz in this experiment result in frequencies at the upper limit of the human hearing frequency range. Low frequency acoustic waves also tend to travel farther and high frequency acoustic waves are more apt to be absorbed by the surrounding atmosphere. / Master of Science
|
3 |
Wall Jet Boundary Layer Flows Over Smooth and Rough SurfacesSmith, Benjamin Scott 27 May 2008 (has links)
The aerodynamic flow and fluctuating surface pressure of a plane, turbulent, two-dimensional wall jet flow into still air over smooth and rough surfaces has been investigated in a recently constructed wall jet wind tunnel testing facility. The facility has been shown to produce a wall jet flow with Reynolds numbers based on the momentum thickness, Re<SUB>&delta</SUB> = &deltaU<SUB>m</SUB>/&nu, of between 395 and 1100 and nozzle exit Reynolds numbers, Re<SUB>j</SUB> = U<SUB>m</SUB>b/&nu, of between 16000 and 45000. The wall jet flow properties (&delta, &delta<SUP>*</SUP>, &theta, y<SUB>1/2</SUB>, U<SUB>m</SUB>, u<SUP>*</SUP>, etc.) were measured and characterized over a wide range of initial flow conditions and measurement locations relative to the wall jet source. These flow properties were measured for flow over a smooth flow surface and for flow over roughness patches of finite extent. The patches used in the current study varied in length from 305 mm to 914 mm (between 24 and 72 times the nozzle height, b) and were placed so that the leading edge of the patch was fixed at 1257 mm (x/b = 99) downstream of the wall jet source. These roughness patches were of a random sand grain roughness type and the roughness grain size was varied throughout this experiment. The tests covered roughness Reynolds numbers (k<SUP>+</SUP>) ranging from less than 2 to over 158 (covering the entire range of rough wall flow regimes from hydrodynamically smooth to fully rough). For the wall jet flows over 305 mm long patches of roughness, the displacement and momentum thicknesses were found to vary noticeably with the roughness grain size, but the maximum velocity, mixing layer length scale, y<SUB>/2</SUB>, and the boundary layer thickness were not seen to vary in a consistent, determinable way. Velocity spectra taken at a range of initial flow conditions and at several distinct heights above the flow surface showed a limited scaling dependency on the skin friction velocity near the flow surface.
The spectral density of the surface pressure of the wall jet flow, which is not believed to have been previously investigated for smooth or rough surfaces, showed distinct differences with that seen in a conventional boundary layer flow, especially at low frequencies. This difference is believed to be due to the presence of a mixing layer in the wall jet flow. Both the spectral shape and level were heavily affected by the variation in roughness grain size. This effect was most notable in overlap region of the spectrum. Attempts to scale the wall jet surface pressure spectra using outer and inner variables were successful for the smooth wall flows. The scaling of the rough wall jet flow surface pressure proved to be much more difficult, and conventional scaling techniques used for ordinary turbulent boundary layer surface pressure spectra were not able to account for the changes in roughness present during the current study. An empirical scaling scheme was proposed, but was only marginally effective at scaling the rough wall surface pressure. / Ph. D.
|
4 |
Mean And Fluctuating Pressure Field In Boat-Tail Separated Flows At Transonic SpeedsRajan Kumar, * 11 1900 (has links) (PDF)
No description available.
|
5 |
Fluid Dynamics and Surface Pressure Fluctuations of Two-Dimensional Turbulent Boundary Layers Over Densely Distributed Surface RoughnessHopkins, Andrew 03 May 2010 (has links)
Measurements were made in two-dimensional zero pressure gradient turbulent boundary layers over 5 geometries of three-dimensional densely distributed surface roughness. A 3-velocity component laser Doppler velocimeter was used to measure instantaneous velocities. These measurements permitted an independent estimate of skin friction on the surfaces using a momentum balance approach, and the validity of the von Karman constant for rough walls was tested. Five roughness fetches were evaluated: three sandpaper roughness fetches of varying grit size and two cases of uniformly distributed hemispheres of different spacing. Optical surface profilometry was used to characterize the geometry of the sandgrain surfaces.
It was found that the smooth wall von Karman constant can not be assumed for densely distributed rough wall flows in order to determine the skin friction for these flows. This requires an independent measure of skin friction using more than a single boundary layer profile. Near wall flow structure measurements found that the hemispherical elements do not have high TKE or Reynolds shearing stress regions at the trailing edge of elements as had been shown for sparsely spaced cylindrical elements. This is likely due to the sharp trailing corner of the cylindrical elements, as opposed to an effect of spacing. Rather, hemispherical roughness has a periodically occurring high stress and TKE region located between two element centers in the stream-wise direction at a height of approximately 1.5 times the roughness element height. The periodic nature of the near wall flow extends to approximately 4 roughness element heights. The traditional roughness function f(λ) did not correlate well with λ or the modified Λ for the experimental data. However, it was found that the friction coefficient for the current dense roughness cases is a constant 0.004, within the experimental uncertainty. Traditional inner wall scalings, outer wall scalings, and roughness scalings were not able to collapse surface pressure fluctuation spectra for the various rough wall surfaces tested. However, the data do collapse for individual geometries based on Reynolds number. This gives rise to the ability to predict pressure fluctuation spectra at other Reynolds numbers. / Ph. D.
|
6 |
The Rough Wall High Reynolds Number Turbulent Boundary Layer Surface Pressure SpectrumMeyers, Timothy Wade 11 March 2014 (has links)
There have been very few studies investigating the rough wall pressure spectra under fully rough flows, which are relevant to many common engineering applications operating within this regime. This investigation uses the Virginia Tech Stability Wind Tunnel to perform experiments on a series of high Reynolds number zero pressure gradient turbulent boundary layers formed over rough walls in an effort to better understand and characterize the behavior of the rough wall pressure spectrum. The boundary layers were fully rough, and the boundary layer height remained sufficiently larger than the height of the roughness elements. Two rough surfaces were tested. One consisted of an array of 1-mm ordered hemispherical elements spaced 5.5-mm apart, and the other contained 3-mm hemispherical elements randomly spaced, but with the same element density as 1/3 of the 1-mm ordered roughness. The wall pressure spectrum and its scaling were then studied in detail, and it was found that the rough wall turbulent pressure spectrum at vehicle relevant conditions is defined by three scaling regions. One of which is a newly discovered high frequency scaling defined by viscosity, but controlled by the friction velocity adjusted to exclude the pressure drag on the roughness elements. Based on these three scaling regions an empirical model describing the wall pressure spectra for hydraulically smooth, traditionally rough, and fully rough flows was explored. Two point wall pressure fluctuations were also analyzed for each surface condition, and it was found that the roughness inhibits the convective velocities within the inner portions of the boundary layer. / Master of Science
|
7 |
Study of Far Wake of a Surface-Mounted Obstacle Subjected to Turbulent Boundary Layer FlowsChaware, Shreyas Satish 23 August 2023 (has links)
Experimental investigations were conducted with and without the presence of the surface-mounted obstacle to quantify its effects on the far wake. The obstacle chosen for this study was a 3:2 elliptical nose NACA 0020 tail wing-body (Rood body), approximately of height equal to the boundary layer thickness at one of the measurement locations of the flow. The experiments were performed by varying the Reynolds number of the flow and manipulating the pressure gradient distributions using a NACA 0012 airfoil placed within the wind tunnel test section. The measurements were acquired utilizing a spanwise traversing boundary layer rake and a point pressure sensing microphone array.
The findings reveal that the presence of the obstacle introduces disruptions in the flow, such as vortex and jet regions in the wake. However, the overall flow behavior remains consistent with that of an undisturbed turbulent boundary layer, for varying Reynolds numbers and pressure gradients. Notably, an adverse pressure gradient and lower Reynolds number both accentuate the prominence of the jet and vortex region within the wake, with the trend reversing towards the other end of the spectrum. This behavior is akin to the larger turbulent boundary layer under adverse pressure gradients and lower Reynolds numbers. Furthermore, the presence of obstacles induces an increase in the overall level of the wall pressure spectrum by approximately 2 dB, regardless of the flow condition. Additionally, it leads to a deviation in the slope of the mid-frequency range of the autospectra compared to the smooth wall case. Specifically, the mid-slope frequency of an undisturbed turbulent boundary layer is steeper than that observed in the disturbed wake flow caused by the obstacle. / Master of Science / The interaction between turbulence and aerodynamic surfaces gives rise to wall-pressure fluctuations, which in turn induce structural vibrations and acoustic noise. On surfaces turbulent flows meet, antennae, flaps, and other frequently mounted measuring devices. The flow in their wake is impacted by the coherence of a turbulent boundary layer being disrupted by these impediments mounted on aerodynamic surfaces. They also alter the nature of the pressure fluctuations that are generated on the surface of interest. The far wake of a Rood Body obstacle was studied using a point pressure sensing microphone array and a spanwise traversing boundary layer rake. Experimental measurements were taken for a range of Reynolds numbers and pressure gradient environments at the Virginia Tech Stability Wind Tunnel.
Results show that the boundary layer rake measurements resolve the presence of the obstacle wake successfully, by characterizing the wake structures and confirming the presence of jet and vortex regions in the wake of the obstacle. Surface pressure measurements reveal that the presence of the obstacle causes the low-frequency content of the wall pressure to be less dominant than the no obstacle case, while the high-frequency content becomes more dominant in the presence of the obstacle. The presence of obstacles also increases the overall levels of the wall pressure spectrum by approximately 2 dB.
|
8 |
Sound Radiated from Turbulent Flow over Two and Three-Dimensional Surface DiscontinuitiesAwasthi, Manuj 13 November 2015 (has links)
Measurements have been performed to understand the sound source mechanism in turbulent boundary layer flow over two and three-dimensional surface discontinuities whose height is smaller than the incoming boundary layer thickness. The work was performed in two different types of boundary layers: a wall-jet flow and a conventional high Reynolds boundary layer. In the wall-jet flow, measurements of far field sound from two-dimensional forward facing steps, gaps with rounded corners and swept forward facing steps with rounded corners were made. The sound from a forward facing step is shown to exhibit effects of non-compactness. Rounding the step corner results in consistent drop in sound levels but the directivity of the sound field remains unchanged. The sound from gaps is dominated by the forward step component and remains unaffected by rounding of the backward step portion. The sound from swept forward facing steps was found to approximately obey an acoustic sweep independence principle up to a sweep angle of 30 deg when the spanwise inhomogeneity in the flow is accounted for using a simple source distribution model. Sweep independence is also observed for steps with corner rounding radii up to 25% of the step height.
The work performed in the high Reynolds number boundary layer included measurements on forward facing steps with rounded corners and a three-dimensional circular embossment with the same height as the forward step. The highest Reynolds number based on discontinuity height achieved in this work was approximately 93,000. The results show that rounding the forward step corner has the same qualitative effect on far field sound as in the wall-jet boundary layer. Quantitatively, for similar boundary layer edge velocity the sound is higher than in the wall-jet flow. The near field measurements show that the separation bubble downstream of the step shrinks as the step corner is rounded while the bubble upstream remains unaffected by it. The unsteady surface force in the lower half of the vertical face of the step was found to be independent of corner rounding. The force on the downstream surface shows similar character within the separation bubble for each rounding but decays faster with increasing downstream distance due to reduced bubble size. The unsteady force measurements were applied to the theory of Glegg et al. (2014) and the resultant of the unsteady forces on the vertical face and downstream surface placed at the top corner of the step is shown to qualitatively describe the far field sound. The acoustic sweep independence principle was applied to the far field sound from the circular embossment and it has been shown that the sound from the three-dimensional geometry can be predicted with reasonable accuracy using sound from a two-dimensional forward step with the same span. / Ph. D.
|
Page generated in 0.1215 seconds