[pt] A notória complexidade inerente ao processo de KDD - Descoberta de Conhecimento em Bases de Dados - decorre essencialmente de aspectos relacionados ao controle e à condução deste processo (Fayyad et al., 1996b; Hellerstein et al., 1999). De uma maneira geral, estes aspectos envolvem dificuldades em perceber inúmeros fatos cuja origem e os níveis de detalhe são os mais diversos e difusos, em interpretar adequadamente estes fatos, em conjugar dinamicamente tais interpretações e em decidir que ações devem ser realizadas de forma a procurar obter bons resultados. Como identificar precisamente os objetivos do processo, como escolher dentre os inúmeros algoritmos de mineração e de pré-processamento de dados existentes e, sobretudo, como utilizar adequadamente os algoritmos escolhidos em cada situação são alguns exemplos das complexas e recorrentes questões na condução de processos de KDD. Cabe ao analista humano a árdua tarefa de orientar a execução de processos de KDD. Para tanto, diante de cada cenário, o homem utiliza sua experiência anterior, seus conhecimentos e sua intuição para interpretar e combinar os fatos de forma a decidir qual a estratégia a ser adotada (Fayyad et al., 1996a, b; Wirth et al., 1998). Embora reconhecidamente úteis e desejáveis, são poucas as alternativas computacionais existentes voltadas a auxiliar o homem na condução do processo de KDD (Engels, 1996; Amant e Cohen, 1997; Livingston, 2001; Bernstein et al., 2002; Brazdil et al., 2003). Aliado ao exposto acima, a demanda por aplicações de KDD em diversas áreas vem crescendo de forma muito acentuada nos últimos anos (Buchanan, 2000). É muito comum não existirem profissionais com experiência em KDD disponíveis para atender a esta crescente demanda (Piatetsky-Shapiro, 1999). Neste contexto, a criação de ferramentas inteligentes que auxiliem o homem no controle do processo de KDD se mostra ainda mais oportuna (Brachman e Anand, 1996; Mitchell, 1997). Assim sendo, esta tese teve como objetivos pesquisar, propor, desenvolver e avaliar uma Máquina de Assistência Inteligente à Orientação do Processo de KDD que possa ser utilizada, fundamentalmente, como instrumento didático voltado à formação de profissionais especializados na área da Descoberta de Conhecimento em Bases de Dados. A máquina proposta foi formalizada com base na Teoria do Planejamento para Resolução de Problemas (Russell e Norvig, 1995) da Inteligência Artificial e implementada a partir da integração de funções de assistência utilizadas em diferentes níveis de controle do processo de KDD: Definição de Objetivos, Planejamento de Ações de KDD, Execução dos Planos de Ações de KDD e Aquisição e Formalização do Conhecimento. A Assistência à Definição de Objetivos tem como meta auxiliar o homem na identificação de tarefas de KDD cuja execução seja potencialmente viável em aplicações de KDD. Esta assistência foi inspirada na percepção de um certo tipo de semelhança no nível intensional apresentado entre determinados bancos de dados. Tal percepção auxilia na prospecção do tipo de conhecimento a ser procurado, uma vez que conjuntos de dados com estruturas similares tendem a despertar interesses similares mesmo em aplicações de KDD distintas. Conceitos da Teoria da Equivalência entre Atributos de Bancos de Dados (Larson et al., 1989) viabilizam a utilização de uma estrutura comum na qual qualquer base de dados pode ser representada. Desta forma, bases de dados, ao serem representadas na nova estrutura, podem ser mapeadas em tarefas de KDD, compatíveis com tal estrutura. Conceitos de Espaços Topológicos (Lipschutz, 1979) e recursos de Redes Neurais Artificiais (Haykin, 1999) são utilizados para viabilizar os mapeamentos entre padrões heterogêneos. Uma vez definidos os objetivos em uma aplicação de KDD, decisões sobre como tais objetivos podem ser alcançados se tornam necessárias. O primeiro passo envolve a escolha de qual algoritmo de mineração de dados é o mais apropriado para o problema em questão. A Assistência ao Planejamento de Ações de KDD auxilia o homem nesta escolha. Utiliza, para tanto, uma metodologia de ordenação dos algoritmos de mineração baseada no desempenho prévio destes algoritmos em problemas similares (Soares et al., 2001; Brazdil et al., 2003). Critérios de ordenação de algoritmos baseados em similaridade entre bases de dados nos níveis intensional e extensional foram propostos, descritos e avaliados. A partir da escolha de um ou mais algoritmos de mineração de dados, o passo seguinte requer a escolha de como deverá ser realizado o pré-processamento dos dados. Devido à diversidade de algoritmos de pré-processamento, são muitas as alternativas de combinação entre eles (Bernstein et al., 2002). A Assistência ao Planejamento de Ações de KDD também auxilia o homem na formulação e na escolha do plano ou dos planos de ações de KDD a serem adotados. Utiliza, para tanto, conceitos da Teoria do Planejamento para Resolução de Problemas. Uma vez escolhido um plano de ações de KDD, surge a necessidade de executá-lo. A execução de um plano de ações de KDD compreende a execução, de forma ordenada, dos algoritmos de KDD previstos no plano. A execução de um algoritmo de KDD requer conhecimento sobre ele. A Assistência à Execução dos Planos de Ações de KDD provê orientações específicas sobre algoritmos de KDD. Adicionalmente, esta assistência dispõe de mecanismos que auxiliam, de forma especializada, no processo de execução de algoritmos de KDD e na análise dos resultados obtidos. Alguns destes mecanismos foram descritos e avaliados. A execução da Assistência à Aquisição e Formalização do Conhecimento constitui-se em um requisito operacional ao funcionamento da máquina proposta. Tal assistência tem por objetivo adquirir e disponibilizar os conhecimentos sobre KDD em uma representação e uma organização que viabilizem o processamento das funções de assistência mencionadas anteriormente. Diversos recursos e técnicas de aquisição de conhecimento foram utilizados na concepção desta assistência. / [en] Generally speaking, such aspects involve difficulties in perceiving innumerable facts whose origin and levels of detail are highly diverse and diffused, in adequately interpreting these facts, in dynamically conjugating such interpretations, and in deciding which actions must be performed in order to obtain good results. How are the objectives of the process to be identified in a precise manner? How is one among the countless existing data mining and preprocessing algorithms to be selected? And most importantly, how can the selected algorithms be put to suitable use in each different situation? These are but a few examples of the complex and recurrent questions that are posed when KDD processes are performed. Human analysts must cope with the arduous task of orienting the execution of KDD processes. To this end, in face of each different scenario, humans resort to their previous experiences, their knowledge, and their intuition in order to interpret and combine the facts and therefore be able to decide on the strategy to be adopted (Fayyad et al., 1996a, b; Wirth et al., 1998). Although the existing computational alternatives have proved to be useful and desirable, few of them are designed to help humans to perform KDD processes (Engels, 1996; Amant and Cohen, 1997; Livingston, 2001; Bernstein et al., 2002; Brazdil et al., 2003). In association with the above-mentioned fact, the demand for KDD applications in several different areas has increased dramatically in the past few years (Buchanan, 2000). Quite commonly, the number of available practitioners with experience in KDD is not sufficient to satisfy this growing demand (Piatetsky-Shapiro, 1999). Within such a context, the creation of intelligent tools that aim to assist humans in controlling KDD processes proves to be even more opportune (Brachman and Anand, 1996; Mitchell, 1997). Such being the case, the objectives of this thesis were to investigate, propose, develop, and evaluate an Intelligent Machine for KDD-Process Orientation that is basically intended to serve as a teaching tool to be used in professional specialization courses in the area of Knowledge Discovery in Databases. The basis for formalization of the proposed machine was the Planning Theory for Problem-Solving (Russell and Norvig, 1995) in Artificial Intelligence. Its implementation was based on the integration of assistance functions that are used at different KDD process control levels: Goal Definition, KDD Action-Planning, KDD Action Plan Execution, and Knowledge Acquisition and Formalization. The Goal Definition Assistant aims to assist humans in identifying KDD tasks that are potentially executable in KDD applications. This assistant was inspired by the detection of a certain type of similarity between the intensional levels presented by certain databases. The observation of this fact helps humans to mine the type of knowledge that must be discovered since data sets with similar structures tend to arouse similar interests even in distinct KDD applications. Concepts from the Theory of Attribute Equivalence in Databases (Larson et al., 1989) make it possible to use a common structure in which any database may be represented. In this manner, when databases are represented in the new structure, it is possible to map them into KDD tasks that are compatible with such a structure. Topological space concepts and ANN resources as described in Topological Spaces (Lipschutz, 1979) and Artificial Neural Nets (Haykin, 1999) have been employed so as to allow mapping between heterogeneous patterns. After the goals have been defined in a KDD application, it is necessary to decide how such goals are to be achieved. The first step involves selecting the most appropriate data mining algorithm for the problem at hand. The KDD Action-Planning Assistant helps humans to make this choice. To this end, it makes use of a methodology for ordering the mining algorithms that is based on the previous experiences, their knowledge, and their intuition in order to interpret and combine the facts and therefore be able to decide on the strategy to be adopted (Fayyad et al., 1996a, b; Wirth et al., 1998). Although the existing computational alternatives have proved to be useful and desirable, few of them are designed to help humans to perform KDD processes (Engels, 1996; Amant & Cohen, 1997; Livingston, 2001; Bernstein et al., 2002; Brazdil et al., 2003). In association with the above-mentioned fact, the demand for KDD applications in several different areas has increased dramatically in the past few years (Buchanan, 2000). Quite commonly, the number of available practitioners with experience in KDD is not sufficient to satisfy this growing demand (Piatetsky-Shapiro, 1999). Within such a context, the creation of intelligent tools that aim to assist humans in controlling KDD processes proves to be even more opportune (Brachman & Anand, 1996; Mitchell, 1997). Such being the case, the objectives of this thesis were to investigate, propose, develop, and evaluate an Intelligent Machine for KDD-Process Orientation that is basically intended to serve as a teaching tool to be used in professional specialization courses in the area of Knowledge Discovery in Databases. The basis for formalization of the proposed machine was the Planning Theory for Problem-Solving (Russell and Norvig, 1995) in Artificial Intelligence. Its implementation was based on the integration of assistance functions that are used at different KDD process control levels: Goal Definition, KDD Action- Planning, KDD Action Plan Execution, and Knowledge Acquisition and Formalization. The Goal Definition Assistant aims to assist humans in identifying KDD tasks that are potentially executable in KDD applications. This assistant was inspired by the detection of a certain type of similarity between the intensional levels presented by certain databases. The observation of this fact helps humans to mine the type of knowledge that must be discovered since data sets with similar structures tend to arouse similar interests even in distinct KDD applications. Concepts from the Theory of Attribute Equivalence in Databases (Larson et al., 1989) make it possible to use a common structure in which any database may be represented. In this manner, when databases are represented in the new structure, it is possible to map them into KDD tasks that are compatible with such a structure. Topological space concepts and ANN resources as described in Topological Spaces (Lipschutz, 1979) and Artificial Neural Nets (Haykin, 1999) have been employed so as to allow mapping between heterogeneous patterns. After the goals have been defined in a KDD application, it is necessary to decide how such goals are to be achieved. The first step involves selecting the most appropriate data mining algorithm for the problem at hand. The KDD Action-Planning Assistant helps humans to make this choice. To this end, it makes use of a methodology for ordering the mining algorithms that is based on the previous performance of these algorithms in similar problems (Soares et al., 2001; Brazdil et al., 2003). Algorithm ordering criteria based on database similarity at the intensional and extensional levels were proposed, described and evaluated. The data mining algorithm or algorithms having been selected, the next step involves selecting the way in which data preprocessing is to be performed. Since there is a large variety of preprocessing algorithms, many are the alternatives for combining them (Bernstein et al., 2002). The KDD Action-Planning Assistant also helps humans to formulate and to select the KDD action plan or plans to be adopted. To this end, it makes use of concepts contained in the Planning Theory for Problem-Solving. Once a KDD action plan has been chosen, it is necessary to execute it. Executing a KDD action plan involves the ordered execution of the KDD algorithms that have been anticipated in the plan. Executing a KDD algorithm requires knowledge about it. The KDD Action Plan Execution Assistant provides specific guidance on KDD algorithms. In addition, this assistant is equipped with mechanisms that provide specialized assistance for performing the KDD algorithm execution process and for analyzing the results obtained. Some of these mechanisms have been described and evaluated. The execution of the Knowledge Acquisition and Formalization Assistant is an operational requirement for running the proposed machine. The objective of this assistant is to acquire knowledge about KDD and to make such knowledge available by representing and organizing it a way that makes it possible to process the above-mentioned assistance functions. A variety of knowledge acquisition resources and techniques were employed in the conception of this assistant.

Understanding what to do and how to complete academic tasks is an essential yet complicated academic activity. However, this area has been under-examined. The purpose of this study is to investigate students’ understanding of academic tasks with qualitative and quantitative approaches. Ninety-eight students participated in this study. First, the study explored the kinds of tasks students identified as challenging, the disciplines in which these tasks were situated, the types of structures these tasks had, and challenges found in students’ task analysis activity. Second, the study examined the relationships between students’ task understanding and academic performance. The findings indicated that although students struggled with various tasks, they struggled even more when tasks became less pre-scribed. The results also showed that task understanding was statistically significantly co-related to academic performance and task understanding, particularly, implicit aspect of task understanding, predicted students’ academic performance. The findings supported Hadwin’s (2006) model of task understanding.