Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Missouri-Columbia, 2006. / The entire dissertation/thesis text is included in the research.pdf file; the official abstract appears in the short.pdf file (which also appears in the research.pdf); a non-technical general description, or public abstract, appears in the public.pdf file. Title from title screen of research.pdf file viewed on (February 28, 2007) Vita. Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (M.A.)--Ohio State University, 1981. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 74-79). Available online via OhioLINK's ETD Center.

The purpose of this thesis is to trace Marx&rsquo / s critique of Hegel from the beginning to the end and to draw attention to his continuous dialogue with Hegel, which results in Marx&rsquo / s appropriation of Hegel&rsquo / s dialectic in all its aspects. To this aim, we will focus on the texts in which Marx criticizes Hegel and try to understand how he develops his position against Hegel&rsquo / s philosophy. Marx has always become in a critical relationship with Hegel&rsquo / s philosophy and considered it as a philosophy which must be transcended since it, for Marx, amounts to justify the present reality which, in Marx&rsquo / s eyes, constitutes a great barrier for human freedom. However, Marx also regards Hegel&rsquo / s philosophy, in which dialectic occupies a central place, as one which includes the most developed conception of science and the true scientific method, and attempts to use Hegel&rsquo / s dialectic in his critique of political economy. In this thesis, by following Marx&rsquo / s critique of Hegel, we will try to show that Marx comes closer to Hegel&rsquo / s dialectic even when he criticizes Hegel&rsquo / s philosophy.

The purpose of this thesis is to trace Marx&rsquo / s critique of Hegel from the beginning to the end and to draw attention to his continuous dialogue with Hegel, which results in Marx&rsquo / s appropriation of Hegel&rsquo / s dialectic in all its aspects. To this aim, we will focus on the texts in which Marx criticizes Hegel and try to understand how he develops his position against Hegel&rsquo / s philosophy. Marx has always become in a critical relationship with Hegel&rsquo / s philosophy and considered it as a philosophy which must be transcended since it, for Marx, amounts to justify the present reality which, in Marx&rsquo / s eyes, constitutes a great barrier for human freedom. However, Marx also regards Hegel&rsquo / s philosophy, in which dialectic occupies a central place, as one which includes the most developed conception of science and the true scientific method, and attempts to use Hegel&rsquo / s dialectic in his critique of political economy. In this thesis, by following Marx&rsquo / s critique of Hegel, we will try to show that Marx comes closer to Hegel&rsquo / s dialectic even when he criticizes Hegel&rsquo / s philosophy.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Missouri-Columbia, 2007. / The entire dissertation/thesis text is included in the research.pdf file; the official abstract appears in the short.pdf file (which also appears in the research.pdf); a non-technical general description, or public abstract, appears in the public.pdf file. Title from title screen of research.pdf file (viewed on November 21, 2007) Vita. Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (M.A.)--Catholic Theological Union at Chicago, 1994. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 158-163).

Thesis (M. A.)--Ohio State University, 2008. / Title from first page of PDF file. Includes bibliographical references (p. 106-123).

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Notre Dame, 2008. / Thesis directed by David Solomon for the Department of Philosophy. "July 2008." Includes bibliographical references (leaves 359-378).

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Syracuse University, 2008. / "Publication number: AAT 3333576."

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Missouri-Columbia, 1999. / Typescript. Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 171-178). Also available on the Internet.