Thesis (LLM)--University of Stellenbosch, 2006. / Bibliography. Also available via the Internet.

No description available.

No description available.

Thesis (M.S.)--University of North Dakota, 2005. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 67-74) Also available online.

This dissertation analyzes social and legal influences on Texas death-sentenced prisoners who hastened their own execution. Using variables derived from research on other types of decisions to hasten death, I compare these prisoners with other similarly-situated condemned prisoners who did not seek to hasten execution, and develop a theoretical model for their decisions. In addition, I examine both how these prisoners explain their decisions, and how court proceedings can shape these explanations. The dissertation concludes with a discussion of the sociolegal construction of different rights to die. / text

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Tufts University 1999. / Submitted to the Interdisciplinary Program. Adviser: Howard M. Solomon. "Doctor of Philosophy in the Interdisciplinary Program." Includes bibliographical references (leaves 454-497). Access restricted to members of the Tufts University community. Also available via the World Wide Web;

In recent years the right to die has emerged from the fringes as a global movement - locally tailored - advocating for patient access to medically assisted-death. Although proposed and actualized models of assisted-death vary in method and level of accessibility, a majority of right to die advocates are motivated by a belief that suffering can at times be “unnecessary”. Based on an overview of the anthropology of suffering and fieldwork in Quebec, Ontario, and Belgium, my research focuses on right to die advocates’ conceptualization of suffering in relation to assisted-death and on how their understanding suffering shapes their views on when assisteddeath should be permitted. I argue that those supporting assisted-death are brought in a form of solidarity through the belief that at times suffering is meaningless and devoid of deeper significance.

Most Americans will die in a hospital or skilled care facility. Despire diligent efforts by local citizens groups, state and national foundations, and healthcare providers to inform the public about their legal rights, only 15% of patients have advanced directives in the form of a living will or health care proxy (Haynor, 1998). Advanced directives that are available are often out-dated, ambiguous, incomplete, unacknowledged, or disregarded by both healthcare providers and family members. An educational program was offered to the residents of a low-income senior housing complex to introduce the "Five Wishes" advanced directive developed by the Commission on Aging with Dignity. The program involved informing the participants about advanced directives, identifying communication strategies for the participants when talking with their physician and family about their wishes, encouraging and assisting participants to complete an advanced directive, and identifying ways to distribute their completed directive. The program was attended voluntarily by thirty-two residents. Results of the anonymous program evaluations revealed the program provided good information about advanced directives, that the information was useful, and that the participants felt more knowledgeable about advanced planning. The majority of participants stated they felt comfortable discussing their wishes with their physician and family, and most wished to complete an advanced directive. Nurse practitioners are in a unique position to provide education, support, and guidance for patients regarding advanced directives. Advanced care planning should be an integral part of the patient's health care. The longitudinal relationships formed through continued health care provision give primary care practitioners the opportunity to help patients remain in control of their care throughout their lives and to keep the patients informed of changes in self-determined healthcare laws and health policies.

Univ., Diss.--Göttingen, 2003. / Literaturverz. S. 259 - 299.

Law / LL.M.