This study reviewed current Taiwan abroad-employed related regulations, administrations and fishery labor globalization with related researches so as to further probe the abroad-employed fishery workers in Tong-Kang Area of Pingtung County. Due to the unique labor import mechanism and special political situation between Taiwan and China, mainland Chinese and foreign abroad-employed fishmen have very different ways of restrictions on border crossing, working restriction and life and culture adoption. This study conducts face-to-face interviewed with government officials, union staffs, ship owners, and fishery workers to clarify the role, status of abroad-employed institution and to explore and discuss the possible future amendment for policy makers. After analyzing the interviews of the 12 cases, there are 8 main findings as follows: 1. the abroad-employed fishery play a strong and positive role on fishery labor supplement; 2.ship owners and workers expect working permits when ashore; 3.the difference and coexist of abroad and domestic employing policy, lower the number of local fishery workers and obstruct the development; 4. the institutional difference and coexist of abroad and domestic employing contribute to management chaos; 5. future policy amendment is inevitable; 6. Jumping ship cases (fishermen escape from legitimate employer) might be caused by malfunction of management and life adaption; 7. Compulsive confinement for mainland Chinese fish men need to be renamed for humanistic reasons; 8. The government ought to improve and supervise the operation of confinement centers. Based on the findings, we suggest that 1. Compulsive confinement policy and the ban on working seem adjustable; 2. Giving working permit and individual life consulting could help improve working efficiency; 3. The integration of competent authorities including fishery, immigration, quarantine, the police, mainland affairs council, will benefit the continuity of Fishery workers¡¦ abroad-employing policy.