Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-12-01T21:08:41Z No. of bitstreams: 1 RebeckaWanderleyTannuss_DISSERT.pdf: 1376305 bytes, checksum: af4fb4a5e86b62929d4496a05f0927b7 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-12-04T23:57:36Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 RebeckaWanderleyTannuss_DISSERT.pdf: 1376305 bytes, checksum: af4fb4a5e86b62929d4496a05f0927b7 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-12-04T23:57:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 RebeckaWanderleyTannuss_DISSERT.pdf: 1376305 bytes, checksum: af4fb4a5e86b62929d4496a05f0927b7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-08-22 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior (CAPES) / A presente pesquisa tem como objetivo geral analisar a atua??o do psic?logo no sistema prisional paraibano, bem como, relacion?-la com a pol?tica criminal vigente. Para tanto, foram elencados como objetivos espec?ficos: mapear e caracterizar o trabalho dos psic?logos nas institui??es prisionais paraibanas; investigar as rela??es existentes entre a pol?tica criminal e a atua??o dos psic?logos junto ?s institui??es prisionais. No tocante ao m?todo, foram realizadas 10 entrevistas semiestruturadas e individuais com psic?logos que trabalham nos pres?dios da Para?ba. A an?lise dos dados foi realizada a partir do referencial te?rico da Criminologia Cr?tica, perspectiva de enfoque materialista e que se prop?e a estabelecer uma an?lise radical dos mecanismos punitivos e das reais fun??es do sistema penal. Os resultados obtidos confirmaram a realidade j? esperada: pris?es superlotadas; p?ssimas condi??es de infraestrutura; insalubridade; in?meras viola??es aos direitos humanos. No que tange aos profissionais, esses se inserem no sistema prisional paraibano por meio de equipes de sa?de, cujo trabalho tem se voltado, de modo geral, para acompanhamentos individuais, realiza??o de testes r?pidos de sa?de e atividades pontuais. Al?m disso, os psic?logos tamb?m t?m a pr?tica voltada para a constru??o de documentos que subsidiam decis?es judiciais relacionadas ? progress?o de regime e livramento condicional. As entrevistas apontaram para a preval?ncia do modelo cl?nico de atua??o com discursos voltados para culpabiliza??o da fam?lia, individualiza??o das quest?es que norteiam o cometimento do crime e forte influ?ncia das Criminologias Positivista e Liberal. Notou-se tamb?m que a atua??o desenvolvida esbarra diretamente nas condi??es prec?rias de trabalho, como a alta demanda, superpopula??o carcer?ria e aus?ncia de infraestrutura adequada. Por fim, pode-se concluir que a pr?tica do psic?logo dentro das pris?es ainda faz parte de um debate complexo e em constru??o, com limita??es que s?o potencializadas pelo ambiente violento e prec?rio. Somando-se a isto, a perman?ncia de pr?ticas que est?o muito mais se adequando ao modelo tradicional do que ampliando uma an?lise que se aproxime da garantia de direitos humanos nos pres?dios e repense estruturalmente a exist?ncia das pris?es. / This research aims to analyse the psychologist's practice in the prison system in the state of Paraiba - Brazil, as well as correlate it to the current criminal policy. In order to do so, the following have been listed as the specific objectives: map and characterise the work of psychologists in the prison institutions in Paraiba; investigate the existing relations between the criminal policy and the practice of the psychologists in the prison institutions. As for the method, ten semistructured and individual interviews were performed with psychologists who work in the prisons of Paraiba. The analysis of the data was done based on the Critical Criminology as a theorical framework, which is a perspective that focuses on materialism and which aims to establish a radical analysis of the punitive mechanisms and of the true functions of the penal system. The results obtained confirmed the expected reality: overcrowded prisons; terrible infrastructure conditions; insalubrity; countless violations of human rights. As for the professionals, they are inserted in the prison system in Paraiba through the health teams, whose job has been, all in all, to perform individual follow-ups, run quick health tests and do punctual activities. Besides that, the psychologists also have their practice aimed to the production of documents that subsidise judicial decisions related to the progression of regime and parole. The interviews pointed towards a predominance of the clinical practice with speeches that focus on the culpabilisation of the family, individualisation of the matters that lead to committing a crime and a strong influence of the Positivist and Liberal Criminologies. It was also observed that the practice faces obstacles such as precarious working conditions, great demand, overcrowded prisons and lack of adequate infrastructure. Finally, it can be concluded that the pratice of the psychologist in the prisons is part of a coplex debate which is still under development, with limitations which are intensified by the violent and precarious environment. On top of that, practices keep getting closer and closer to the traditional model rather than expanding an analysis that approaches the guarantee of human rights in the prisons and rethinks the existance of those penal institutions.