Spelling suggestions: "subject:"turtles -- florida"" "subject:"turtles -- hlorida""
1 |
Identifying mating systems of imperiled marine turtles nesting in southern Florida through exclusion analysis to estimate the breeding sex ratioUnknown Date (has links)
The reproductive behavior of migratory organisms is difficult to characterize as
the mating behavior can be difficult to observe. For some species, one sex can be readily
observable, but the other may remain hidden, confounding attempts to assess population
demographics. For such species, it can be difficult to determine the sex ratio of the
population. Without accurate accounts of the numbers of males and females, conservation
methods may be insufficient and their performance unclear. Alternative methods of
measuring sex ratios therefore must be used to estimate the number of individuals and
assess breeding behavior. Here I identified breeding sex ratios (BSR) measured using
paternity analysis of offspring through exclusion analysis to quantify the numbers of
males contributing. Here I discuss the mating behavior of three species of marine turtle
that nest in southern Florida: the loggerhead (Caretta caretta), the leatherback (Dermochelys coriacea), and the green sea turtle (Chelonia mydas) at three beaches
(Boca Raton, Juno Beach, and Sanibel Island) from 2013-2017; over 400 nesting females
were identified and genotyped and almost 7,000 hatchlings were collected and
genotyped. Females from all three species successfully mated with more than one male in
all years analyzed demonstrating multiple paternity of clutches. For loggerheads, many
male genotypes were identified, suggesting that females likely mate en route to their
nesting grounds, inducing a male-biased BSR. Examination of females that were sampled
more than once per season (repeats), evidence of sperm storage was found for all nests
and some turtles might mate in between nesting events. Leatherback females displayed a
higher rate of multiple paternity than was previously published for other Caribbean
nesting sites; I hypothesize that this result may be due to a mainland nesting beach effect.
The leatherback BSR over all years was approximately 1:1, and one male was identified
fathering than two different females’ nests (polygyny). For green turtles, multiple
paternity was found and there was evidence of polygyny. Across all three species,
evidence for indirect benefits of mating multiply (hatching success or larger hatchlings)
was weak or not supported. Together, the four studies contribute to the overall body of
reproductive behavior studies. / Includes bibliography. / Dissertation (Ph.D.)--Florida Atlantic University, 2018. / FAU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Collection
|
2 |
The Hatching and Emergence of Loggerhead Turtle (Caretta caretta) HatchlingsDemmer, Richard J. 01 April 1981 (has links) (PDF)
Loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta) eggs were collected at the time of laying during the summer of 1977 on the beaches of Canaveral National Seashore and the Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge in Brevard County, Florida. The eggs were placed in land-lines buckets and maintained at ambient temperature in a house trailer hatchery. After 50 to 55 days of incubation whole or partial clutches were transferred to glass observation containers and covered to a depth of 20 cm. Hatching and emergence behavior were visually observed and activity was timed on an event recorder that was activated by four motion switches placed within or above the clutch. Pipping of the eggs occurred at a mean of 60.5 days after egg deposition. Emergence occurred at a mean of 61.8 hours after pipping and 63.1 days after egg deposition. The hatching and emergence sequence was described. It was concluded that hatching and emergence were socially facilitated. A mechanism for socially facilitated hatching was proposed. Volumetric reduction of the nest behavior before or during pipping was described. Emergence may be inhibited by rising temperatures in the morning and stimulated by falling temperatures within a certain range at night. Social facilitation, in addition to the obvious value of providing a means for reaching the surface, was apparently advantageous to hatchlings as they emerged and raced towards the surf en masse. Under these conditions predators are likely to be efficient than they would be if hatchlings emerged singly.
|
3 |
Growth rates of juvenile green turtles, Chelonia Mydas, from three developmental habitats along the east central coast of FloridaKubis, Stacy A. 01 July 2003 (has links)
No description available.
|
4 |
Characterizing juvenile green turtles, (Chelonia mydas), from three east central Florida developmental habitatsBagley, Dean A. 01 July 2003 (has links)
No description available.
|
5 |
Reproductive success of sea turtles nesting on Wabasso Beach, East-Central FloridaHorton, Michael James January 1989 (has links)
During the summers of 1988 and 1989, nests of 528 loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta), 27 green sea turtles (Chelonia mydas), and 1 leatherback sea turtle (Dermochelys coriacea) were monitored on Wabasso Beach in Indian River County, Florida. Two hundred and forty four of the loggerhead and 2 of the green sea turtle nests were marked during night surveys as the females laid their clutches, permitting exact clutch counts and carapace measurements on the nesting females. Each marked nest was inspected daily for signs of disturbance and hatching. After incubation (70 days), study nests were excavated and inventoried to determine hatchling emergence success. Parametric multiple regressions, nonparametric multiple regressions, and logistic regressions were used to determine the effects of several measured variables on clutch sizes and incubation times; and nesting, hatchling emergence success, and predation. Excluding the last 2 weeks of the nesting season, nesting was positively correlated with ocean temperatures (P< 0.05), but not with human beach-side development (P> 0.05). Nesting loggerheads on the study area had an average carapace length of 89.8 cm (S.E.=0.31), and a mean clutch size of 112 eggs (S.E.=1.07). Clutches required an average of 53.9 days (S.E.=0.21) to incubate during 1988, with a hatchling emergence success of 57%. During 1989, the mean incubation time and hatchling emergence success was 51.5 days (S.E.=0.21) and 44%, respectively. Over the 2 study years, the average green turtle nest had 118 eggs, took 54.6 days to incubate, and had a hatchling emergence success of 40%. During 1988, 4.6% of the loggerhead nests were lost to beach erosion or alteration (deposition of sand on nests by the surf). This loss was 22% during 1989 for loggerheads, and 30% over both years for green turtles. The difference in loggerhead losses over the 2 years was due to 2 late-season hurricanes which affected the area during 1989. Predation on loggerhead nests was 16% and 8% during 1988 and 1989, respectively. In both years, predation was positively correlated with human beach-side development (P<0.05); during 1989, predation also was positively correlated with distance of the nest from the beach dune (P< 0.05). Clutch size and carapace size of nesting females were positively correlated (P< 0.05). Incubation time was negatively correlated with egg laying date, and hatchling emergence success was strongly affected by the late summer storms of 1989. The study area produced an estimated 70,469 loggerhead sea turtle hatchlings per year (8,808 hatchlings/km), and 535 green sea turtle hatchlings per year (66 hatchlings/km). The number of loggerhead sea turtle hatchlings produced per nest was adversely affected by beach-side development. / Master of Science
|
6 |
Hatching success, embryonic mortality, and infertility in loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and green (Chelonia mydas) sea turtles nesting in Brevard County, FloridaOsegovic, Karen M. 01 July 2001 (has links)
No description available.
|
7 |
Growth rates and body condition of juvenile green turtles (Chelonia mydas) in Dry Tortugas National Park and Marine Protected AreaUnknown Date (has links)
Dry Tortugas National Park (DRTO) consists of 261.8 km2 in the Gulf of Mexico and provides protection to marine species facing a multitude of threats. Among the many species that utilize DRTO is the green sea turtle (Chelonia mydas). I examined seven years of capture-recapture data to determine how the body condition (using Fulton’s equation, K = M/L3) and growth rate for juvenile green turtles vary within, and among size classes in DRTO, and how those rates compare to similar populations in other locations. Body conditions ranged from 0.77 to 1.71 (mean 1.3 SD ± 0.16). Growth rates ranged from 2.5 to 9.9cm/yr (mean 5.5 cm/yr SD ± 1.25), which is a high growth rate for green turtles. Establishing growth rates and body condition for a specific population can provide insight into life history and health of that population, as well as important data
for comparison to populations in other areas. / Includes bibliography. / Thesis (M.S.)--Florida Atlantic University, 2015 / FAU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Collection
|
8 |
Regional differences in migratory activity by hatchling loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta): effect of reciprocal nest translocationsUnknown Date (has links)
There are four distinct subpopulations of loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) in Florida as determined behaviorally by geographic fidelity, and genetically by mitochondrial haplotypes. The South Florida subpopulation consists of females nesting on the southeastern and southwestern coasts of Florida and their offspring. Previous research shows that west coast hatchlings exhibit higher levels of nocturnal swimming during the postfrenzy period than east coast hatchlings. This study attempted to determine how these differences in migratory behavior develop. A reciprocal translocation experiment was conducted to distinguish between environmental and genetic factors. No consistent differences in hatchling swimming behavior were seen based on geography. Movement of nests resulted in lower levels of nocturnal swimming behavior in hatchlings compared to hatchlings that emerged from natural nests, suggesting that the relocation of nests may not provide a natural incubation environment for developing hatchlings. / by Jeffrey Guertin. / Thesis (M.S.)--Florida Atlantic University, 2010. / Includes bibliography. / Electronic reproduction. Boca Raton, Fla., 2010. Mode of access: World Wide Web.
|
9 |
The effect of beach renourishment on sea turtle nesting and hatching success at Sebastian Inlet State Recreation Area, East-Central FloridaRyder, Cheryl E. 19 September 2009 (has links)
In April of 1990 the Sebastian Inlet Tax District received a long-term (25 year) permit to conduct maintenance dredging of the navigation channel at Sebastian Inlet, Florida. Approximately 105,150 cubic meters of sediment will be removed every two years and pumped to a feeder beach immediately south of the inlet. The renourished beach, a high density nesting beach for loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and green (Chelonia mydas) sea turtles, is within the proposed Archie Carr National Wildlife Refuge and will play a critical role in the long-term maintenance of Sebastian Inlet as a navigable waterway. A turtle monitoring program was implemented by the District at the request of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The monitoring program was designed to investigate nesting behavior, reproductive success and physical characteristics of the nesting habitat on the renourished beach at Sebastian Inlet and on a control beach (Wabasso Beach).
Daily nesting surveys were conducted to record all sea turtle nests and non-nesting emergences in each study area. All nests were marked, monitored throughout incubation and inventoried to determine hatching and emergence success. Data on physical parameters were collected in monthly profiles of each beach. Compaction values were recorded with a cone penetrometer along transects from the dune to mean high water line. Temperature of the ambient beach was recorded at 30 and 60-cm depths along two transects from the dune to mean high water line. Moisture and sand grain analysis were conducted monthly in 1991. Sea turtle nesting and hatching success were similar on the renourished and control beaches in 1990 and 1991, suggesting that renourishment had no adverse effect on sea turtle reproductive success. Nesting success on the renourished and control beaches, respectively, was 42.0% (N = 104) and 45.0% (N = 65) in 1990, and 62.9% (N = 165) and 62.4% (N = 118) in 1991. Hatching success on the renourished and control beaches, respectively, was 80.7% (N = 85) and 79.3% (N = 59) in 1990, and 69.1% (N = 118) and 66.7% (N = 102) in 1991. Compaction values averaged 500 PSI on the renourished beach, while values on the control were approximately 250 PSI. The higher level of compaction on the renourished beach resulted in a lack of complete nest covering, and aberrant nest chamber configurations on the renourished beach. Grain size and moisture content were similar on the renourished and control beaches. Compaction levels were not related to incompatible fill, implying that the manner in which the material was deposited resulted in the increased compaction. Beach temperatures measured at 30-cm and 60-cm depths indicated that the renourished beach was consistently 0.5°C warmer than the control beach.
If the physical parameters of a subsequent renourishment project are within the findings of 1990 and 1991, there should be no adverse effect on sea turtle nesting and hatching success. The results of this project cannot be applied to other beach renourishment projects however, but should be restricted to future dredging projects at Sebastian Inlet. Although the results are not applicable to other locations, the methodologies developed to study the effects of renourishment on sea turtles could be applied to other beach renourishment situations. Future research should focus on how the physical parameters of a renourished beach affect the micro-environment within the actual nest chamber and embryonic development. / Master of Science
|
10 |
A comparative study of the nesting ecology of the leatherback turtle Dermochelys coriacea in Florida and TrinidadMaharaj, Ann Marie 01 January 2004 (has links)
No description available.
|
Page generated in 0.0561 seconds