Thesis (Ph. D.)--Oregon State University, 2005. / Printout. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 123-137). Also available on the World Wide Web.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Washington, 2002. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 100-117).

Thesis (M.S.)--Oregon State University, 1996. / Typescript (photocopy). Includes bibliographical references (leaves 229-241). Also available online.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Duke University, 2007. / Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (M.S.)--Oregon State University, 2005. / Printout. Includes bibliographical references. Also available on the World Wide Web.

Thesis (Ph. D.(Botany))--Rhodes University, 2001.

No description available.

No description available.

The literature, long-term temporal data sets, and spatial data points surrounding livestock watering pints within rangeland communities wearer used to examine common assumptions and concepts used in models of vegetation dynamics. Of the stability concepts examined, the constancy concept was invalidated using long-term relict area data, whereas long-term data following disturbance indicated that sagebrush-dominated areas could be considered as resilient under circumstances examined. Pioshpere as well as relict and post-disturbance data indicated that the individualistic notion of vegetation change was favored. Species showing the most predictability (based on repeatability of abundance curves, and spatial and temporal serial correlations) were sagebrush and cheatgrass, specifically in their response to fire. Bunchgrasses were characterized by their persistence in abundance under all circumstances (grazing disturbance and fire disturbance) except long-term absence of fire. This, together with the support of the individualistic notion of plant community change, suggests examining change on a vital attributes basis with kinetic framework. It was found that most models of vegetation dynamics could be validated, because of the multivariate nature of the data examined. A closer examination of the requirements of range management for a models to be used as a basis for range condition and trend analysis determined that three basic model types are needed by range managers: First, a conceptual model for marrying divergent perspectives of different rangeland user groups; send, mechanistic models for the exploration of vegetation dynamics; and third, expert systems for information transfer. Further emphasis was placed on deriving a suitable conceptual models subscribing to the Objective of linking vegetation dynamics, range management, and monitoring within sagebrush-dominated areas. Important characteristics (derived from the data sets examined) included in this model are the recognition of static and dynamic plant communities, swathes of change rather than predefined pathways, the individualistic nature of change, and the recognition of spatial heterogeneity. Predictability at various scales was incorporated by focusing on cheatgrass and sagebrush, since these species indicated the most repeatable dynamics observed in the data sets, and were “common denominator”’ species (thus overcoming the problem of spatial heterogeneity). The undesired effects of cheatgrass and sage brush on other growth-forms suggest that monitoring and managing these undesired species may be a proactive way of managing for a desired plant community incorporating a balance of growth-forms.

Ph.D., Faculty of Science, University of the Witwatersrand, 1987