South Africa’s private sector and the practice of using market processes are often dismissed by the government as service providing options, because they increase costs and fail the poor population. There is some substance to the government’s position, given that there is a natural monopoly advantage in water service provision. Under these circumstances it could be expected that a single firm would emerge as dominant in the provision of these services to urban customers. Were this firm a private one, and unregulated, it could be expected to practice exploitative pricing, make excess profits, and undersupply waste water management service. A private firm would also not provide services to the poor unless their service was subsidised. However most of these deficiencies can be regulated (as shown in Chapter Four), and also occur under public sector provision (as shown in Chapter Five) Are the private sector failures sufficient reason to abandon the market and private sector as mechanisms to deliver water service in South Africa? This dissertation finds little use is made of market processes and the private sector in water service provision (Chapter One), despite there being legal provision for such involvement (Chapter Two). It also finds that public water service providers are not subject to competition policy and consumer protection provisions, whereas private sector providers would be (Chapter Three). The administration of questionnaires to municipalities and the Department of Water Affairs (DWA) show that the various water service providers often operate under unique circumstances, making it difficult to extrapolate management insights from one municipality to another (Chapter Six). A case study on Nelson Mandela Bay Municipal tariff setting reveals a mismatch between economic principle and policy practice, and suggests that economic principle plays a lesser role in the design of tariff structures than other factors (Chapter Seven). Given the problems that are occurring in public sector water service provision, the dissertation concludes the case for dismissing private sector or public utility models for water service delivery may be weaker than is believed by the South African government.

Thesis (M.Com. (Accounting))--University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Commerce, Law and Management, School of Accountancy, 2017 / The Water Trading Entity (WTE) under the Department of Water Affairs and Sanitation in South Africa is mandated by the National Water Act to charge users for raw water supplied, and the tariffs it charges must enable it to fully recover its costs. The entity is concerned that it is not achieving full equity in relation to refining the recovery mechanism to obtain tariffs that represent usage of resources. This research study sought to investigate the possibility of implementing Activity Based Costing (ABC) in order to overcome the deficiencies of using the Traditional Costing system. ABC is a costing tool that measures the cost of activities to provide more accurate cost information for management. This research examines the practicalities of applying ABC in the water sector. WTE supplies raw water to the Water Boards who further supply to Municipalities, which in turn supply to the final consumers. It is possible that due to the limitations of the traditional costing there may be a price distortion throughout the water supply value chain, and if this is corrected consumers may pay a fair price for water. This research paper has revealed that indirect costs are quite significant within the WTE and proposes an ABC model that would be easy to implement to allocate costs more accurately leading to a full recovery of costs. Keywords: Activity Based Costing, Traditional Costing, Indirect Costs, Water Schemes / GR2018