Spelling suggestions: "subject:"need control"" "subject:"need coontrol""
81 |
How the Quick Hitch Guidance Systems Work and Their Practical ApplicationsThacker, Gary W., Coates, Wayne E. 03 1900 (has links)
This article explains the operation of the two types of quick hitch guidance systems on the market. Techniques for farming with precision guidance are offered.
|
82 |
Effect of Norflurazon (Zorial Rapid 80®) Mixed with Pendimethalin (Prowl®) and Prometryn (Caparol®) on Cotton Stand Establishment and YieldMcCloskey, William B., Dixon, Gary L. 03 1900 (has links)
The effect on cotton stand establishment and seed cotton yield of various rates of norflurazon applied in combination with pendimethalin or both pendimethalin and prometryn was determined in field studies conducted at the Maricopa Agricultural Center in 1994 and 1995 in a sandy loam soil. Cotton stand counts were highest when only pendimethalin was applied or when no herbicide was used. Tank mixing prometryn with pendimethalin did not significantly reduce plant populations. Tank mixing increasing amounts of norflurazon with pendimethalin resulted in decreasing plant populations in both the wet and the dry plant experiments. Tank mixing increasing rates of norflurazon with both pendimethalin and prometryn caused a similar decline in plant populations in both the wet and the dry plant experiments. The symptoms of dying cotton seedlings and the stand count data indicated that notflurazon was the component of the tank mixtures that caused seedling mortality. The effect of the herbicide treatments on seed cotton yields was much less than on stand counts, but the same trends discussed above were evident. However, at the label rate for norflurazon in coarse textured soils, 0.5 lb a. i./A, seed cotton yields were not significantly reduced. The smaller effect of the herbicide treatments on seed cotton yields was due to the bush type nature of DPL 5415 and increased growth of surviving plants when plant populations were reduced. The data indicates that yield losses were not significant unless plant populations were reduced below about 20,000 to 25,000 plants /A.
|
83 |
Monitoring and Management of Whitefly Resistance to Insecticides in ArizonaDennehy, T. J., Williams, Livy III, Russell, June S., Li, Xiaohua, Wigert, Monika 03 1900 (has links)
Monitoring of whitefly resistance in the major cotton producing areas of Arizona confirmed the presence of an over 100 fold resistance to the mixture of Danitol® + Orthenem (fepropathrin + acephate). Strong evidence was found of cross-resistance affecting the other principle pyrethroid insecticides used to control whiteflies (Asana®, Capture® Karate®). Susceptibility to Ovasyn® varied widely in leaf -disk bioassays; lesser variation was observed in whitefly susceptibility to endosulfan. A provisional resistance management strategy (IRM) for Arizona whiteflies was formulated and evaluated in a 200 acre field trial in 1995. A key element of the strategy was diversifying as much as possible the insecticides used against whiteflies. Contrasts of this (rotation) strategy with a more conventional (less diverse) regime showed that rotation slowed but did not prevent resistance from developing. By seasons end both the IRM and conventional plots had very high and comparable levels of resistance to Danitol® + Ortliene®. This large field trial illustrated clearly the seriousness of the whitefly resistance problems faced in Arizona. It showed that whitefly populations cannot be managed effectively solely with the products currently registered for this purpose in Arizona. The large shift to lower susceptibility took place with as few as 3 insecticide treatments. In concert, our field art laboratory results indicated unequivocally that Arizona growers will be forced by resistance to greatly reduce reliance on pyrethroid insecticides in the future. This underscores the urgency for obtaining approval of novel new insecticides for whitefly control and for deploying new products within the framework of a resistance management strategy that limits their use.
|
84 |
Cotton Herbicide TestHazlitt, Jim 02 1900 (has links)
No description available.
|
85 |
Cotton Yields by Layby HerbicideArmstrong, Jim 02 1900 (has links)
No description available.
|
86 |
Preplanting Applications of Herbicides Incorporated in Shaped Beds for Narrow-Row CottonArle, F., Hamilton, K. C. 02 1900 (has links)
No description available.
|
87 |
High Population Cotton Grain Drill PlantingArle, F., Hamilton, K. C. 02 1900 (has links)
No description available.
|
88 |
High Population Cotton Flat Plant - 16" RowsArle, F., Hamilton, K. C. 02 1900 (has links)
No description available.
|
89 |
Preplanting Applications of Herbicides Incorporated Before Bed Shaping for Narrow-Row CottonHamilton, K. C., Arle, F. 02 1900 (has links)
No description available.
|
90 |
Short Staple Herbicide TrialTurner, Fred 02 1900 (has links)
No description available.
|
Page generated in 0.5339 seconds