Graduation date: 1982

Lao Man-hoi. / Thesis submitted in: December 2001. / Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2002. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 52-54). / Abstracts in English and Chinese. / Abstract (English) --- p.i / Abstract (Chinese) --- p.ii / Acknowledgements --- p.iii / Table of Contents --- p.iv / Chapter 1 --- Introduction --- p.1 / Chapter 1.1 --- Objectives of the Thesis --- p.1 / Chapter 1.2 --- Organization of the Thesis --- p.5 / Chapter 2 --- Literature Review --- p.6 / Chapter 3 --- A Model with Perfect Competition --- p.18 / Chapter 3.1 --- Introduction --- p.18 / Chapter 3.2 --- The Model --- p.19 / Chapter 3.3 --- Income Distribution --- p.23 / Chapter 3.3.1 --- Changes in the Relative Price --- p.23 / Chapter 3.3.2 --- Income Distribution --- p.24 / Chapter 3.4 --- WelfareAnalysis --- p.26 / Chapter 4 --- A Model with Imperfect Competition --- p.28 / Chapter 4.1 --- Introduction --- p.28 / Chapter 4.2 --- The Model --- p.29 / Chapter 4.3 --- Outputs and Income Distribution --- p.33 / Chapter 4.3.1 --- Short-Run Capital Specificity --- p.35 / Chapter 4.3.2 --- Long-Run Capital Mobility --- p.38 / Chapter 4.4 --- Welfare Analysis --- p.42 / Chapter 4.4.1 --- Short-Run Capital Specificity --- p.43 / Chapter 4.4.2 --- Long-Run Capital Mobility --- p.44 / Chapter 5 --- Summary and Concluding Remarks --- p.47 / Appendices --- p.50 / Bibliography --- p.52

In this thesis we define and study the existence of an equilibrium situation in which producers maximize their profits relative to the production vectors in their production sets, consumers satisfy their preferences in their consumption sets under certain budget constraint, and for every commodity total demand equals total supply. This competitive equilibrium situation is referred to as the Walrasian equilibrium. The existence of this equilibrium is investigated from a various mathematical points of view. These include microeconomic theory, simplicial spaces, global analysis and lattice theory.

Part I comprises three chapters (2-4) that analyse the optimal combination of a universal benefit (B≥0) and categorical benefit (C≥0) for an economy where individuals differ in both their ability to work and, if able to work, their productivity. C is ex-ante conditioned on applicants being unable to work, and ex-post conditioned on recipients not working. In Chapter 2 the benefit budget is fixed but the test awarding C makes Type I and Type II errors. Type I errors guarantee B > 0 at the optimum to ensure all unable individuals have positive consumption. The analysis with Type II errors depends on the enforcement of the ex-post condition. Under No Enforcement C > 0 at the optimum conditional on the awards test having some discriminatory power; whilst maximum welfare falls with both error propensities. Under Full Enforcement C > 0 at the optimum always; and whilst maximum welfare falls with the Type I error propensity it may increase with the Type II error propensity. Chapters 3 and 4 generalise the analysis to a linear-income tax framework. In Chapter 3 categorical status is perfectly observable. Optimal linear and piecewise-linear tax expressions are written more generally to capture cases where it is suboptimal to finance categorical transfers to eliminate inequality in the average social marginal value of income. Chapter 4 then derives the optimal linear income tax for the case with classification errors and Full Enforcement. Both equity and efficiency considerations capture the incentives an increase in the tax rate generates for able individuals to apply for C. Part II (Chapter 5) focuses on the decisions of individuals to work when receiving C, given a risk of being detected and fined proportional to C. Under CARA preferences the risk premium associated with the variance in benefit income is convex-increasing in C, thus giving C a role in enforcement.