Spelling suggestions: "subject:"windback sea"" "subject:"windback seul""
1 |
A NUMERICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF WINDBACK SEALSLim, Chae H. 16 January 2010 (has links)
Windback seals work similarly to labyrinth seals except for the effect of helical
groove. These seals are essentially a tooth on stator or tooth on rotor labyrinth seal
where the grooves are a continuous helical cut like a thread. Windback seals are used in
centrifugal gas compressor to keep oil out of the gas face seal area. These face seals
cannot be contaminated by oil. A purge gas is applied to the seal to help force the oil
back into the bearing area.
The windback seal should be designed to prevent any oil contamination into the
supply plenum and to reduce purge gas leakage. The CFD simulations have been
performed with the effect of clearance, tooth width, cavity shape, shaft rotation,
eccentricity, and tooth location on the seal leakage performance and the flow field inside
the seal. The leakage flow rate increases with increasing the pressure differential, rotor
speed, radial clearance, cavity size, and shaft diameter and with decreasing the tooth
width. The eccentricity has a minimal effect for the windback seal. From oil simulations,
the windback seal with 25% rotor eccentricity has some of the journal bearing action and
drives back flow into the gas plenum. However the windback seal can be used to force the oil back into the bearing side before starting the compressor by applying a purge gas
flow since the positive axial velocity inside the cavity is larger than the negative axial
velocity. m A Rw cav & / ? is constant for varying shaft rotation since the leakage flow rate
for the windback seal increases linearly as the the rotor speed increases. The leakage
flow rate for the windback seal increases as the groove size increases due to the pumping
action of the windback seal. A windback seal design based upon the numerical
simulations that minimize gas leakage and help prevent gas face seal oil contamination
was optimized.
The windback seal has two leakage flow paths. Since the leakage flow rate under
teeth of windback seals is the same as for a similar geometry labyrinth seal, the flow
under the teeth can be predicted by two-dimensional labyrinth seal analysis. An
empirical model for the leakage rate through the cavity has been developed which fits
the data with a standard deviation of 0.12.
|
2 |
Windback seal design for gas compressors: a numerical and experimental studyAl-Ghasem, Adnan Mahmoud 17 September 2007 (has links)
Seals are considered one of the important flow elements of a turbomachinery device.
Traditional labyrinth seals have proven their performance functionality by reducing leakage
rates. Significant improvements on labyrinth seal functionality were obtained through altering
the design geometry of labyrinth seals to prevent contamination across a seal and maintaining
small leakage flowrates. This results in a windback seal that has only one tooth which
continuously winds around the shaft like a screw thread. These seals are used in gas compressors
to isolate the gas face seal from bearing oil. A purge gas is passed through the seal into the
bearing housing. The helical design allows the seal to clear itself of any oil contamination.
Windback seal performance is controlled through changing the seal geometry. A 2D graphical
design tool for calculating the total and cavity leakage flowrates for windback seals is
introduced.
The effectiveness of the Fluent CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) commercial code
to accurately predict the leakage rate for windback seals was evaluated. The objective is to
determine if CFD simulations can be used along with a few experimental tests to study windback
seals of this design with air as the working fluid. Comparison of measurement and predictions
for a windback seal using the ú-õ turbulence model with enhanced wall treatment functions show
predictions and measurements comparing very well with a maximum difference of 5% for
leakage rate. Similarly, the leakage rate of the tested smooth seal compares favorably with two
dimensional CFD predictions, with a difference of 2%-11% and 8%-15% using laminar and ú-õ
turbulent flow models, respectively. The variation of leakage with shaft speed and pressure ratio
across the seals is accurately predicted by the CFD simulations. Increasing the rotor speed to
15000 rpm increases the measured leakage flowrate for the windback seal by 2% at high
differential pressure and 4.5% at low differential pressure, and decreases it by 10 % for the
smooth seal. The effects of seal clearance, tooth pitch, cavity depth and the tooth number of starts on
leakage flowrate, velocity and pressure distributions were studied numerically for three
differential pressures and four rotor speeds.
|
Page generated in 0.053 seconds