Sustainability of dairy production depends on their production of feed and finding ways to increase profitability through dairy production or even carbon (C) crediting and adding C inputs into the soil to sequester C. To increase farm profitability, dairy producers in Illinois, has intensified their feed production through integrating winter cereals such as winter cereal rye (Secale cereale) (WCR) into single season corn for silage (double cropping). Intensified cropping system allows for increased feed production, covering the soil year-round, and adding C inputs while minimizing nutrient loss mainly through runoff or leaching. Two management practices that improve the sustainability of corn silage – WCR double crop are harvesting date and nitrogen (N) management during the WCR phase of the production. This thesis has two main chapters. Chapter 1 evaluates the effect of harvesting date (five weekly harvest from late-March to early-May) with and without optimum N addition (0 vs. 47 kg N ha-1). Our objective was to evaluate harvesting date and spring N fertilization effect on WCR morphology, forage yield, nutrient removal, and quality. A quadratic model best explained an increase in WCR biomass in response to GDD (growing degree days) accumulation (R2 = 0.81). Increase in GDD linearly decreased WCR relative forage quality (RFQ). Benchmarking RFQ at 150 for dairy milk production indicates that WCR should be harvested at a GDD of 543 at which WCR plant height was 31.8 cm and dry matter (DM) biomass was 0.77 Mg ha-1. Benchmarking RFQ at 125 for heifer production indicated that harvest should occur at a GDD of 668 at which the WCR was 71 cm tall and its DM yield was 2.25 Mg ha-1. Nitrogen balances were negative at the no-N control treatment indicating a need for some N to maximize WCR yield. We found that a rate between 21 and 42 kg N ha-1 maximizes yields reflecting on slightly positive balances. Our results suggest that harvesting date can be predicted by GDD and should be adjusted for RFQ. We conclude that smaller than 42 kg N ha-1 N fertilizer is required for WCR production in soils with manure history and high soil organic matter (>30 g kg-1). Chapter 2 hypothesized that N fertilization of WCR as cover crop can increase nutrient recycling and C sequestration which offers C trading benefits to growers. We evaluated the effects of N fertilizer application in fall (0 vs. 56 kg N ha-1), and N fertilizer rates in spring (0, 23, 47, and 71 kg ha-1) on WCR dry matter (DM) biomass and cover crop quality. Results indicated that fall N fertilization had no effect on WCR biomass or quality reflecting on loss of applied N in the fall. Spring N application did not affect WCR biomass yield but increased N, P, and K concentrations, their uptake, C concentration, and decreased C:N and lignin:N ratios. We concluded that only spring N fertilization improves WCR cover crop benefits. Overall, we suggest that for high-quality forage, (RFQ at 150) WCR should be harvested at a GDD of 543 at which WCR plant height was 31.8 cm and dry matter (DM) biomass was 0.77 Mg ha-1. For RFQ of 125 (for heifer production), harvest should occur at a GDD of 668 at which the WCR was 71 cm tall and its DM yield was 2.25 Mg ha-1. Neither in fall nor in spring, N fertilization increase WCR C accumulation. Spring N fertilization reduces WCR C:N and lignin:N which are desirable for crop production.

Agroecosystem sustainability as a framework for agriculture production systems requires attention to detail to multiple facets of the underlying production system. Production systems must achieve optimal cash crop yields while remaining profitable. Likewise, production practices must be tailored to reduce its environmental footprint. Identifying practices that encourage improved soil physical and chemical properties while maintaining yields have largely been challenging. Cover crops have been an integral part of the conversation regarding practices that can generally improve those properties of soil responsible for overall soil health. Use of winter cereal cover crops (WCCC’s) have shown promise as a tool for reducing soil and nutrient run-off, thereby reducing nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) nonpoint source pollution in the Upper Mississippi River Basin (UMRB). However, corn-cash crop yield penalties are often incurred following the use of WCCC’s such as winter cereal rye (Secale cereal) (WCR), as N is immobilized by cover crop residues in the decomposition processes. Additionally, traditional planting methods of cover crops have resulted in reductions of harvestable populations of corn and soybeans. These problems indicate a necessity for novel cover crop planting methods that reduce the consequential outcomes of implementing traditional cover crop practices. Using a method called “Skipping the corn row” (STCR), otherwise identified as “precision planted” cover crops, we aimed to reduce the cash crop yield-limiting interactions of cover crop residues within the cash crop row. We hypothesized that removing cover crop biomass from the subsequently planted cash crop row (chapter 1) could minimize N immobilization by residues, thereby increasing our subsequent yield potential and economic optimum return to N (EORN). In novel cover crop planting methods preceding soybeans (chapter 3), our hypothesis indicated that mixtures of WCR and crimson clover (Trifolium incarnatum) would impact biomass accumulation of weed communities, while novel measures that allowed for reduced seeding rates would permit competitive soybean yields while reducing input costs for cover crop seed. Chapter 2 focused on interseeding mixtures of WCR and crimson clover, where we hypothesized that residual rates would marginally impact percent cover of WCR and crimson clover mixtures. Our results indicated, in chapter one, that reducing seeding rate by using STCR planting method did indeed drive seed cost savings while improving yield and EORN in comparison to a traditionally planted cover crop. Our results in chapter 3 also indicated reduced seeding rates found in novel planting methods improved the on-farm economics of using cover crops while maintaining healthy soybean yields. Lower-than-average rainfall accumulations later in the growing season coupled with cover crop residues likely influenced soil moisture retention, benefiting the cash crop during the dry spell, helping maintain yields. Interseeding methods, as studied in chapter 2, did not show any significant impact on corn grain yield or yield components. Subsequently, half- and full-rate residual herbicides did not impact percent cover of cover crops. However, use of residual herbicides should be consistent with all herbicide labels and laws, and producers should use label-recommended amounts to maintain maximum efficacy of herbicides and to prevent resistant weed populations. Also, interseeded cover crops failed to successfully establish, resulting in minimal cover crop biomass in later sampling dates.