余美玉. / 複本據手稿本影印. / Thesis (M.A.)--香港中文大學. / Fu ben ju shou gao ben ying yin. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 361-382). / Yu Meiyu. / Thesis (M.A.)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue. / 前言 --- p.1 / Chapter 第一章 --- 好學不懈的清貧學子 --- p.5 / 註釋 --- p.14 / Chapter 第二章 --- 立志從事史學研究 --- p.18 / 註釋 --- p.38 / Chapter 第三章 --- 走上「民主戰士」的道路 --- p.48 / Chapter 一 --- 讀書救國 --- p.48 / Chapter 二 --- 艱苦的歲月 --- p.55 / Chapter 三 --- 打破緘默、批評時弊 --- p.61 / Chapter 四 --- 反內戰、爭民主 --- p.71 / 註釋 --- p.95 / Chapter 第四章 --- 由「中立」而「親共」、「擁共」 --- p.115 / Chapter 一 --- 抗戰期間的政治態度 --- p.115 / Chapter 二 --- 反內戰時期的「親共」傾向 --- p.123 / Chapter 三 --- 倒向中共 --- p.138 / 註釋 --- p.164 / Chapter 第五章 --- 新政權下重提筆桿 --- p.184 / Chapter 一 --- 普及歷史知識 --- p.184 / Chapter 二 --- 重投筆槍？ --- p.198 / Chapter 三 --- 海瑞諸篇及其他 --- p.207 / Chapter 四 --- 馬列主義與歷史主義 --- p.228 / Chapter 五 --- 論繼承優良傳統 --- p.246 / 註釋 --- p.253 / Chapter 第六章 --- 文化大革命的祭品 --- p.277 / Chapter 一 --- 吳晗事件探探源 --- p.277 / Chapter 二 --- 由學術討論到政治批判 --- p.287 / Chapter 三 --- 含冤而死，禍及全家 --- p.301 / Chapter 四 --- 餘論 --- p.311 / 註釋 --- p.315 / 附錄：《投槍集》校對表 --- p.331 / 參考書目 --- p.361

余志強. / 複本為複印本. / Thesis (M.A.)--香港中文大學. / Fu ben wei fu yin ben. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 344-351). / Yu Zhiqiang. / Thesis (M.A.)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue. / Chapter 第一章 --- 緒論 --- p.1─35 / Chapter 第二章 --- 開始運用馬列主義觀點治史 --- p.36-53 / Chapter 第三章 --- 以古喻今的歷史著作 --- p.54-69 / Chapter 第四章 --- 歷史科學的任務 --- p.70-90 / Chapter 第五章 --- 史學大躍進──吳晗，翦伯贊之反響 --- p.91-139 / Chapter 第六章 --- 怎樣研習中國的歷史 --- p.140-175 / Chapter 第七章 --- 歷史主義與階級觀點 --- p.176-208 / Chapter 第八章 --- 歷史人物的評價問題 --- p.209-244 / Chapter 第九章 --- 農民戰爭問題 --- p.245-299 / Chapter 第十章 --- 怎樣處理歷史上的民族關係問題 --- p.300-334 / 吳晗，翦伯贊著作分類目錄 --- p.335-344 / 參考書目 --- p.344-351

In November of 1965, the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution, was launched in China when a Shanghai newspaper editor, Yao Wen-yuan, published an attack on the play which is translated here, Hai Jui Dismissed from Office. The fact that this event constituted the beginning of what later became a political struggle of vast proportions was recognized only belatedly by most Western analysts. When the Cultural Revolution moved into high gear with the launching of the Red Guard movement in the spring of 1966, vague references were made in some Western commentaries to the fact that the explosion seemed to have been ignited, by the public exposure of a drama which had purportedly satirized the Communist Party and Mao Tse-tung. No one appeared to have any certainty about exactly what the play had said and in what way it satirized Mao and the Party. As far as I am aware, this is the first translation of the entire text of the play, or any part of it, into English. Aside from simply translating the text of the play, the purpose of this thesis is to analyze the events of late 1965 and early 1966 and place them both in chronological order and in political perspective. In this way, it is clearly shown how the attack on Wu Han led to attacks on other "bourgeois" writers and intellectuals. Eventually, this latter group was linked to high officials in the Peking Municipal Committee of the Chinese Communist Party. Finally, the "cultural" aspect of the Cultural Revolution gave way to a full-fledged political battle within the Party itself. / Arts, Faculty of / Asian Studies, Department of / Graduate