Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Washington, 2003. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 82-95).

Etv2 is an endothelial-specific ETS transcription factor that is essential for endothelial differentiation and vascular morphogenesis in vertebrates. However, etv2 expression dynamics during development and the mechanisms regulating it are poorly understood. I found that etv2 transcript and protein expression are highly transient during zebrafish vascular development, with both expressed early during development and then subsequently downregulated. Inducible knockdown of Etv2 in zebrafish embryos prior to mid-somitogenesis, but not later, causes severe vascular defects, suggesting a role for Etv2 in specifying angioblasts from the lateral mesoderm. I further demonstrate that the 3’UTR of etv2 is post-transcriptionally regulated in part by the let-7 family of microRNAs. Ectopic expression of let-7a represses endogenous Etv2 transcript and protein expression with a concomitant reduction in endothelial cell gene expression. Additionally, overexpressed Etv2 in HEK293T cells is ubiquitinated and degraded by the proteasome. Accordingly, endogenous zebrafish Etv2 protein is rapidly degraded in the presence of the translation inhibitor cycloheximide in vivo. Taken together, our results suggest that etv2 acts during early development to specify endothelial lineages and is subsequently downregulated through post-transcriptional and post-translational mechanisms, to allow normal vascular development to proceed.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Washington, 2002. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 115-128).

Thesis (Ph.D.). / Written for the Dept. of Medicine, Division of Experimental Medicine. Title from title page of PDF (viewed 2008/07/23. Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (Ph.D.). / Written for the Dept. of Neurology and Neurosurgery. Title from title page of PDF (viewed 2008/07/24). Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (M.Sc.). / Written for the Dept. of Neurology and Neurosurgery. Title from title page of PDF (viewed 2009/06/18). Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Washington, 2004. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 121-135).

Bioinformatic searching on the zebrafish genome indicates that there are five members of this hormone family (namely GH, SLalpha, SLbeta, PRL1 and PRL2) and four receptors (namely GHR1, GHR2, PRLR1 and PRLR2). However, it should be noted that these ligands and receptors are only named according to their sequence homology with those in other species. There is so far no systematic study to unravel the relationship among the ligands and receptors. The last point is particularly relevant as some of the ligands and receptors are duplicated in the fish genome. In addition, there is much controversy regarding whether one of the two GHRs is in fact the receptor for SL. A systematic study on the interaction among the ligands and receptors in zebrafish would help to resolve these issues. / In fish, growth hormone (GH), prolactin (PRL) and somatolactin (SL) are members of a gene family of polypeptide hormones which share homology in protein sequence and structure. To date, numerous functions have been attributed to this family of hormones such as growth, immune response, protein metabolism and ion regulation. The biological functions of GHlPRL are mediated through binding of the ligands on their respective receptors. It is believed that this gene family arose as the result of multiple gene duplications and subsequent divergent evolution, co-evolving with their corresponding receptors. Despite the above mentioned similarities in their structures, their cognate receptors and their signaling mechanisms, important differences among this gene family of polypeptide hormones can be recognized in their biological functions. / In the present study, the luciferase reporter assay, His-tag pulldown assay and signaling pathway activation were employed to investigate the interaction among the ligands and their receptors. It was shown that recombinant zebrafish GH, PRLI and PRL2 could only interact with their cognate receptors, i.e. GHRl, GHR2, PRLRI and PRLR2 respectively. In comparison, zebrafish SLalpha and SLbeta could neither interact with GHR1, GHR2, PRLR1 and PRLR2 in the binding study, nor could these two SLs activate the receptor-mediated downstream signaling and transcriptional activities of the four receptors in zebrafish. These data argue against the hypothesis that GHRI is the SL receptor. / The role of PRLR in early development of zebrafish was also explored. Whole mount in situ hybridization (WISH) study showed that PRLR1 was mainly expressed in the pancreas and pronephric duct, while PRLR2 was expressed in the pronephric duct only. In the PRLR1 morpholino (MO) knockdown embryos, the yolk extension (YE), the formation of which was reported to be associated with pronephric duct development, disappeared at 24 hours post fertilization. This phenotype could not be observed in the PRLR2 MO knockdown or control embryos. Real time quantitative RT-PCR and WISH data revealed that several genes expressed in the pronephric duct were up or down-regulated. The protein expression pattern of pronephric duct marker atplal was also affected in the embryos injected with PRLRI MO. In addition, histological studies showed that structure of the pronephric duct was destroyed in the PRLRI MO embryos. These results suggest that PRLRI plays an important role in the development of the pronephric duct in zebrafish embryos. / Chen, Mingliang. / "October 2010." / Adviser: Cheung Wing-Tai. / Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 73-04, Section: B, page: . / Thesis (Ph.D.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2011. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 140-179). / Electronic reproduction. Hong Kong : Chinese University of Hong Kong, [2012] System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader. Available via World Wide Web. / Electronic reproduction. [Ann Arbor, MI] : ProQuest Information and Learning, [201-] System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader. Available via World Wide Web. / Abstract also in Chinese.

Diss. (sammanfattning) Stockholm : Karolinska institutet, 2007. / Härtill 4 uppsatser.

Hindbrain patterning requires many factors involved in early segmentation and later segment identity of the specific domains of the hindbrain. Hox proteins and their cofactors are of great importance during segmentation of the hindbrain, because segmentation and/or segment identity are lost when any of them are lost. Previously, we have reported that Meis proteins synergize with Pbx, another Hox cofactor, and Hox proteins expressed in the hindbrain. To further investigate Meis function during hindbrain development, we utilized a Meis dominant-negative molecule, ΔCPbx4, and expressed it in zebrafish embryos. We find that ΔCPbx4 affects gene expression and neuronal differentiation especially in r3 through r5. Further, we combined ΔCPbx4 with another Meis dominant-negative molecule (ΔHDCMeis) to disrupt Meis function more extensively. Under these conditions, we find that the entire hindbrain loses gene expression as well as its complement of neuronal differentiation. This phenotype is strikingly similar to that of loss of Pbx function, suggesting that Meis proteins act in the same pathway as Pbx. Therefore, Meis family proteins are indispensable for the entire hindbrain segmentation. In addition to the milder effect on hindbrain patterning, we also found upon expressing ΔCPbx4 that the caudal hindbrain transforms to r4-like fates, supported by expression of r4-specific marker gene (hoxbla) and specification of r4-specifc Mauthner neurons in the domain. This phenotype is not reported upon loss of Pbx function, suggesting that Meis proteins may play a more modulatory role, while Pbx is absolutely required during hindbrain development. Through several in vivo assays, we find that this r4 transformation is induced by Hox PG1 proteins and that vhnf1 represses r4 fates in the caudal hindbrain to further specify caudal fates in this region. Based on these results, we propose a model by which hindbrain patterning is achieved. Initially, un-segmented hindbrain is segmented into two domains wherein the caudal domain displays an r4 fate. This caudal r4 fate is then repressed by vhnf1 function which restricts the r4 fate to the presumptive r4 domain and specifies r5 and r6 by inducing its downstream genes such as valentino and hox PG3. Taken together, we conclude that Meis family proteins are essentially involved in function of Hox complexes to specify distinct rhombomeres during segmentation of the zebrafish hindbrain.