Spelling suggestions: "subject:"ahmad"" "subject:"nomad""
21 |
Ibn Ḥazm's controversy with the Christians : a study of a section of his al-FiṣalWhyte, George Willard. January 1984 (has links)
No description available.
|
22 |
Ibn Ḥazm's controversy with the Christians : a study of a section of his al-FiṣalWhyte, George Willard. January 1984 (has links)
No description available.
|
23 |
Contemporary Muslim approaches to the study of religion : a comparative analysis of three Egyptian authorsBrodeur, Patrice C. January 1989 (has links)
No description available.
|
24 |
The concept of Tawḥîd in the thought of Ḥamid al-Dîn al-Kirmânî (d. after 411/1021) /Hunzāʾī, Faqīr Muḥammad. January 1986 (has links)
No description available.
|
25 |
Early Ismāīlī thought on prophecy according to the Kitāb al-Iṣlāḥ by Ab ̄ưḤātim al-Rāzī (d. ca.322934-5)Nomoto, Shin. January 1999 (has links)
No description available.
|
26 |
A study of al-Risālah al-bāhirahHirji, Boustan. January 1994 (has links)
A study of al-Risalah al-Bahirah presents a departure in the interpretation of Abu Y`acqub al-Sijistani's (d. approximately between 386/996 and 393/1002--3) writings. It is the first critical edition and translation of al-Risalah al-Bahirah . / Previous scholarship has concentrated on the quest for the historical Sijistani and his alignment with the Fat&dotbelow;imid Imams. This thesis explains Sijistani's relationship with the Fat&dotbelow;imids through a critical analysis of his doctrines of revelation, resurrection and retribution using the Bahirah as its focus.
|
27 |
Contemporary Muslim approaches to the study of religion : a comparative analysis of three Egyptian authorsBrodeur, Patrice C. January 1989 (has links)
Despite significant differences in the why, how and what of their interpretations of religious, our three authors (Muhammad Abu Zahrah, 'Abd-Allah Diraz and Ahmad Shalabi) understand religions, and in Diraz's case the religious phenomenon in general, through categories specific to an Islamic worldview. Their use of Western scientific methods to apprehend the study of religion is not systematic. It varies from Abu Zahrah's limited use to Shalabi's exuberant use, both being highly subservient to polemical intentions. Only Diraz shows familiarity and appreciation for scientific methods, without however subscribing to the epistemology of science which underlies them. The resulting relationship between the scientific study of religion and the Islamic study of religion, as epitomized in the fusion of my own commitments to the former and my authors' commitments to the latter, proves ultimately irreconcilable. Our respective epistemologies remain answerable to different centres of authority; the subjective self in the first instance and the objectified God, Allah, in the second.
|
28 |
Aḥmad Amin, creating an Islamic identityDyck, Veronica H. January 1988 (has links)
No description available.
|
29 |
The development of the doctrine of Vilâyat-i Faqîh : the role of Mullâ Aḥmad Narâqî (11851770-12451830)Kazemi-Moussavi, Ahmad January 1983 (has links)
No description available.
|
30 |
Arguments against the Sunnī legal methodology : Ibn Ḥazm and his refutation of qiyāsTalbot, Karmen E. January 1987 (has links)
No description available.
|
Page generated in 0.0325 seconds