Made available in DSpace on 2014-07-29T16:22:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 dissertacao mirian ecologia e evolucao.pdf: 819322 bytes, checksum: c797257c9c87b956f231f859a3ebf44e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009-04-07 / The generality of Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography was evaluated across its support for diversity structure of Odonata adults and predators, shredders and collectors insect guilds in streams. The evaluation of Neutral Theory was done in two levels of theory s hierarchical structure. One evaluation in the level of yours assumptions, the zero sum assumption, and other in the level of yours predictions to abundance models in communities and metacommunities, ZSM and logseries respectively. The variations predicted to ZSM abundance model, in accordance to dispersal limitation that community are subjected, was evaluated in insect guilds through the streams distance. In Odonata adults the dispersal limitation was evaluated indirectly through regional frequency of species body size. In this case, the ecological equivalence was restricted for body size guilds. Communities of Zygoptera adults have low density and richness within streams. Individuals distribution was grouped, not consistent to linear relation under zero sum assumption. Local abundance of Odonata adults and predators, shredders and collectors guilds didn t fit ZSM model. Geometric series models and logseries models were better in explain the abundance for all groups. Moreover, the occurrence of fit to these models isn t in according to dispersal limitation level that is expected in each region, not supporting the Neutral predictions / A generalidade da Teoria Neutra Unificada para Biodiversidade e Biogeografia foi avaliada através de seu suporte para a estrutura da diversidade de adultos de Odonata e das guildas de insetos predadores, fragmentadores e coletores em córregos. A avaliação da Teoria Neutra foi feita em dois níveis da hierarquia estrutural das Teorias. Uma avaliação no nível de seus pressupostos, o pressuposto de somatório zero, e outra no nível de suas predições para os modelos de distribuição de abundâncias nas comunidades e metacomunidades, respectivamente ZSM e a série logarítmica. As variações preditas para o modelo de abundâncias ZSM, de acordo com a limitação a dispersão que as comunidades estariam sujeitas, foi avaliada nas guildas de insetos através das distâncias dos córregos amostrados. Para os adultos de Odonata, a avaliação da limitação de dispersão foi feita indiretamente através da freqüência regional de tamanhos corporais. Neste caso, o pressuposto de equivalência ecológica foi restringido para guilda de tamanhos corporais. As comunidades de adultos de Zygoptera apresentaram uma baixa densidade e riqueza dentro de córregos. A distribuição de indivíduos foi agrupada o que não está de acordo com o relacionamento linear subjacente ao pressuposto de somatório zero. As abundâncias locais das espécies de adultos de Zygoptera e das guildas de predadores, coletores e fragmentadores não se ajustam ao modelo ZSM. Os modelos série geométrica e série logarítmica foram os que mais explicaram as abundâncias de todos estes grupos. Além do mais, a ocorrência de ajuste a estes modelos não está de acordo com o nível de limitação à dispersão esperado em cada região não suportando as predições da Teoria Neutra

Ash dieback is a severe disease of ash trees (Fraxinus spp.), caused by the invasive fungus Hymenoscyphus fraxineus. In its native East Asia, H. fraxineus is a harmless endophyte, but since its accidental import into Europe in the early 1990s it has infected over 90% of ash trees in some areas, with long-term mortality sometimes exceeding 90%. The disease was discovered in Great Britain in 2012, and has since spread rapidly. This thesis investigates some of the possible impacts on biodiversity, ecosystem functioning, and society, and in doing so identifies ways to alleviate some impacts. Britain has only 13% tree cover (among the lowest in Europe), so may be particularly vulnerable to ash loss. Better understanding of the effects and how to minimise them is critical to deliver an evidence-based response. First, we investigated impacts in woodlands by experimentally killing woodland ash trees by ring-barking. We found no short-term effect of ash loss on ground flora or earthworm communities, or on the regeneration or growth of other woody species. Observational evidence suggested that remaining canopy trees rapidly filled gaps left by ash, perhaps contributing to stability. Our woodlands appeared to be remarkably resilient to ash loss, although there may be long-term effects or impacts on other species that this experiment failed to observe. To investigate broader-scale impacts, we required high-quality abundance maps for ash and other trees across Britain. Using species distribution modelling and random forest regression, we developed a protocol to produce abundance maps from readily available data. We tested the predictive power of the resulting maps using cross validation. Our maps are the best available for abundance of British tree species, and will be useful across a wide range of disciplines. We then used them to model ecosystem vulnerability to ash loss, based on the abundance of ash and other tree species, and their ecological trait similarity. We identified areas at risk of the largest impacts, and produced guidance for positive management actions to minimise ecological change. Lastly, we investigated the financial impacts of ash dieback, estimating the total cost to Britain at £9.2 billion. This figure is many times larger than the value of lost trade if biosecurity were improved to prevent future invasions, questioning the validity of financial arguments against biosecurity. We also found that loss of ecosystem services accounted for less than a third of the total cost, suggesting that ecosystem service assessments may miss a large proportion of the true cost of biodiversity loss. Overall, we found that some impacts may be less than expected, such as local effects on woodland ground flora, and others, such as the economic cost, may be much larger than expected. However, the resilience of ecosystems to a major shock such as loss of a common species, and actions to mitigate the impacts, depend on having a diversity of other trees present. The ash dieback outbreak highlights the importance of preventing other severe pests and diseases of trees from being introduced; something that has been increasing exponentially, largely due to international trade in trees. This thesis provides further firm evidence that there is an ecological and social imperative to halt this trend.

As distribuições de abundância das espécies (SADs) são consideradas uma maneira informativa e sintética de descrever a diversidade biológica, e revelam um dos padrões mais bem estabelecidos da ecologia, que é a predominância de espécies raras nas comunidades biológicas. A generalidade deste padrão o torna relevante para a análise de outros parâmetros das comunidades. Além disso, ele levou ao desenvolvimento dos modelos teóricos de SAD. Os modelos estatísticos de SAD, por sua vez, passaram a ocupar um papel central na biologia, como principio empírico que sustenta várias teorias ecológicas. Preston sugeriu em 1948 que as SADs das comunidades naturais teriam uma distribuição aproximadamente Lognormal, porém apareciam truncadas devido ao efeito do tamanho amostral, cuja forma real só seria revelada, portanto, em amostras grandes. Esta ideia vai de encontro à propriedade estatística da consistência, que implica que o acúmulo de evidência causado pelo aumento do tamanho amostral favorece a aproximação ao modelo verdadeiro, bem como às estimativas de seus parâmetros. Além do efeito do tamanho amostral, os padrões de distribuição de abundância podem diferir dependendo da medida de abundância utilizada. Estudos sugerem que a biomassa seria uma medida de abundância mais adequada para revelar a distribuição subjacente de uma comunidade biológica em amostras ou escalas menores (differential veiling). Neste contexto, nosso objetivo principal neste trabalho foi investigar e discutir a vantagem de considerarmos a biomassa como medida de abundância nos modelos teóricos de distribuição de abundância das espécies. Avaliamos, então, o efeito do tamanho da amostra sobre a qualidade dos ajustes dos modelos sob duas diferentes medidas de abundância: biomassa e número de indivíduos. Simulamos amostras de diferentes tamanhos a partir de amostragens aleatórias de uma base de dados empírica e as ajustamos a diferentes modelos de SADs . Com isso, pudemos avaliar a eficiência das amostras - com cada medida de abundância - em revelar o modelo correto, bem como a acurácia e precisão das estimativas dos parâmetros desses modelos. Para o presente estudo, utilizamos um grupo com reconhecido potencial indicador e relevância para estudos ecológicos, os besouros Scarabaeinae. Os resultados encontrados neste estudo mostram que a maior eficiência da biomassa para revelar a distribuição subjacente não é tão geral quanto sugerem os trabalhos anteriores Os critérios de análise utilizados não favoreceram consistentemente a biomassa como medida mais eficiente em revelar o modelo correto e apresentar maior acurácia e precisão nas estimativas de seus parâmetros. Assim, a afirmativa de que a SAD de biomassa não é oculta (veiled) em escalas e amostra menores não parece ser geral. Os resultados obtidos no presente estudo também indicam que o padrão de differential veiling entre as SADs de biomassa e número de indivíduos podem variar dependendo da escolha do modelo e do conjunto de dados avaliados. No entanto, se a causa do differential veiling entre as SADs de biomassa e número de indivíduos for principalmente devido ao efeito de escala, uma explicação alternativa é que a escala do presente estudo teria que ser ampliada para podermos demonstrá-lo. Considerando então, os efeitos de amostragem apontados pelos nossos resultados sobre a medida de diversidade, destacamos que, apesar da importância do assunto, há uma escassez de estudos que investiguem o uso da biomassa como medida de abundância nas SADs, cujas implicações de diferentes efeitos sobre esta medida destacam a necessidade de estudos adicionais que possibilitem isolar o efeito de escala do efeito de tamanho amostral / The species abundance distributions (SADs) are considered an informative way to describe the biological diversity revealling one of the most wellestablished patterns in ecology: the predominance of rare species in biological communities. The generality of such pattern made it relevant to the analysis of other biodiversity parameters an to induce the development of theoretical models of SAD. On the other hand statistical models of SAD occupied a central role in biology as an empirical principle that underlies many ecological theories. Preston suggested in 1948 that SADs follow an approximately lognormal distribution, but that may appear truncated by the effect of sample size, being completely revealed only in large samples. This idea is associated with the statistical property of consistency, which implies that the accumulation of evidence - represented by the increase in sample size - approaches the samples distribution to the true model, as well as the estimates of the parameters to their real values. Beyond the effect of sample size, the SADs may differ depending on the measure of abundance adopted. Studies suggest that biomass could be a more efficient measure of abundance to reveal the underlying distribution of biological communities in smaller samples or scales (differential veiling). In this context, our aim in this study was to investigate and discuss the advantage of considering biomass in theoretical models of SAD. Thus we evaluated the effect of sample size on the quality of models fitness under two different measures of species abundance: biomass and number of individuals. We simulated samples of different sizes taken from an empirical database of Scarabaeinae beetles - recognized as a potential and relevant indicator in ecological studies. Further we adjusted the simulated samples to different SAD models and evaluated the efficiency of each kind of abundance index to reveal the correct model, as well as the accuracy and precision of the parameters estimates. Our results show that the efficiency of biomass to reveal the underlying distribution is not as general as suggested by previous works. According to our analysis criteria, biomass was not consistently as far more efficient in revealing the correct model or in providing greater accuracy and precision in parameters estimates than the number of individuals. Thus, the statement that the SAD biomass is not veiled on small scales or samples does not seem to be general. Moreover our results also indicate that the effect of differential veiling on SADs using biomass and number of individuals depends on the choice of the evaluated model and data set. However, if the cause of the differential veiling - between the biomass and number of individuals SADs - is mainly due to scale effects. An alternative explanation is that the scale of this study was not wide enough to show it. Considering the sampling effects studied here in biodiversity evaluation we highlight the lack of studies investigating the use of biomass as a measure of abundance in SADs which the implications of different effects on this measure indicate the urgent call by further studies on this subject, enablying us to isolate the effect of scale from the sample size

As distribuições de abundância das espécies (SADs) são consideradas uma maneira informativa e sintética de descrever a diversidade biológica, e revelam um dos padrões mais bem estabelecidos da ecologia, que é a predominância de espécies raras nas comunidades biológicas. A generalidade deste padrão o torna relevante para a análise de outros parâmetros das comunidades. Além disso, ele levou ao desenvolvimento dos modelos teóricos de SAD. Os modelos estatísticos de SAD, por sua vez, passaram a ocupar um papel central na biologia, como principio empírico que sustenta várias teorias ecológicas. Preston sugeriu em 1948 que as SADs das comunidades naturais teriam uma distribuição aproximadamente Lognormal, porém apareciam truncadas devido ao efeito do tamanho amostral, cuja forma real só seria revelada, portanto, em amostras grandes. Esta ideia vai de encontro à propriedade estatística da consistência, que implica que o acúmulo de evidência causado pelo aumento do tamanho amostral favorece a aproximação ao modelo verdadeiro, bem como às estimativas de seus parâmetros. Além do efeito do tamanho amostral, os padrões de distribuição de abundância podem diferir dependendo da medida de abundância utilizada. Estudos sugerem que a biomassa seria uma medida de abundância mais adequada para revelar a distribuição subjacente de uma comunidade biológica em amostras ou escalas menores (differential veiling). Neste contexto, nosso objetivo principal neste trabalho foi investigar e discutir a vantagem de considerarmos a biomassa como medida de abundância nos modelos teóricos de distribuição de abundância das espécies. Avaliamos, então, o efeito do tamanho da amostra sobre a qualidade dos ajustes dos modelos sob duas diferentes medidas de abundância: biomassa e número de indivíduos. Simulamos amostras de diferentes tamanhos a partir de amostragens aleatórias de uma base de dados empírica e as ajustamos a diferentes modelos de SADs . Com isso, pudemos avaliar a eficiência das amostras - com cada medida de abundância - em revelar o modelo correto, bem como a acurácia e precisão das estimativas dos parâmetros desses modelos. Para o presente estudo, utilizamos um grupo com reconhecido potencial indicador e relevância para estudos ecológicos, os besouros Scarabaeinae. Os resultados encontrados neste estudo mostram que a maior eficiência da biomassa para revelar a distribuição subjacente não é tão geral quanto sugerem os trabalhos anteriores Os critérios de análise utilizados não favoreceram consistentemente a biomassa como medida mais eficiente em revelar o modelo correto e apresentar maior acurácia e precisão nas estimativas de seus parâmetros. Assim, a afirmativa de que a SAD de biomassa não é oculta (veiled) em escalas e amostra menores não parece ser geral. Os resultados obtidos no presente estudo também indicam que o padrão de differential veiling entre as SADs de biomassa e número de indivíduos podem variar dependendo da escolha do modelo e do conjunto de dados avaliados. No entanto, se a causa do differential veiling entre as SADs de biomassa e número de indivíduos for principalmente devido ao efeito de escala, uma explicação alternativa é que a escala do presente estudo teria que ser ampliada para podermos demonstrá-lo. Considerando então, os efeitos de amostragem apontados pelos nossos resultados sobre a medida de diversidade, destacamos que, apesar da importância do assunto, há uma escassez de estudos que investiguem o uso da biomassa como medida de abundância nas SADs, cujas implicações de diferentes efeitos sobre esta medida destacam a necessidade de estudos adicionais que possibilitem isolar o efeito de escala do efeito de tamanho amostral / The species abundance distributions (SADs) are considered an informative way to describe the biological diversity revealling one of the most wellestablished patterns in ecology: the predominance of rare species in biological communities. The generality of such pattern made it relevant to the analysis of other biodiversity parameters an to induce the development of theoretical models of SAD. On the other hand statistical models of SAD occupied a central role in biology as an empirical principle that underlies many ecological theories. Preston suggested in 1948 that SADs follow an approximately lognormal distribution, but that may appear truncated by the effect of sample size, being completely revealed only in large samples. This idea is associated with the statistical property of consistency, which implies that the accumulation of evidence - represented by the increase in sample size - approaches the samples distribution to the true model, as well as the estimates of the parameters to their real values. Beyond the effect of sample size, the SADs may differ depending on the measure of abundance adopted. Studies suggest that biomass could be a more efficient measure of abundance to reveal the underlying distribution of biological communities in smaller samples or scales (differential veiling). In this context, our aim in this study was to investigate and discuss the advantage of considering biomass in theoretical models of SAD. Thus we evaluated the effect of sample size on the quality of models fitness under two different measures of species abundance: biomass and number of individuals. We simulated samples of different sizes taken from an empirical database of Scarabaeinae beetles - recognized as a potential and relevant indicator in ecological studies. Further we adjusted the simulated samples to different SAD models and evaluated the efficiency of each kind of abundance index to reveal the correct model, as well as the accuracy and precision of the parameters estimates. Our results show that the efficiency of biomass to reveal the underlying distribution is not as general as suggested by previous works. According to our analysis criteria, biomass was not consistently as far more efficient in revealing the correct model or in providing greater accuracy and precision in parameters estimates than the number of individuals. Thus, the statement that the SAD biomass is not veiled on small scales or samples does not seem to be general. Moreover our results also indicate that the effect of differential veiling on SADs using biomass and number of individuals depends on the choice of the evaluated model and data set. However, if the cause of the differential veiling - between the biomass and number of individuals SADs - is mainly due to scale effects. An alternative explanation is that the scale of this study was not wide enough to show it. Considering the sampling effects studied here in biodiversity evaluation we highlight the lack of studies investigating the use of biomass as a measure of abundance in SADs which the implications of different effects on this measure indicate the urgent call by further studies on this subject, enablying us to isolate the effect of scale from the sample size

An important goal of ecological studies is to identify and explain patterns or variation in species assemblages. Ecologists have discovered that global variation in the number of species in an assemblage relates strongly to climate, area, and topographic variability in terrestrial environments. Is the same true for other characteristics of species assemblages? The focus of this thesis is to determine whether species assemblage structure, defined primarily as the body mass frequency distributions and species abundance distributions relate in convergent ways to a set of a few environmental variables across broad spatial scales. First, I found that for mammals and trees most of their geographic variation across North and South America in assemblage structure is statistically related to temperature, precipitation, and habitat heterogeneity (e.g. different vegetation types) in convergent ways. I then examined bird assemblages across islands and continents. Despite the evolutionary and ecological differences between island and continental assemblages, I found that much of the variation in bird assemblage structure depends on temperature, precipitation, land area, and island isolation in congruent patterns in continent and island bird assemblages. Frank Preston modeled species richness based on the total number of individuals and the number of individuals of the rarest species. Building on Preston’s model, Chapter 2 hypothesized that gradients of diversity correlate with gradients in the number of individuals of the rarest species, which in turn are driven by gradients in temperature and precipitation. This hypothesis assumes that species abundance distributions relate to temperature and precipitation in similar ways anywhere in the world. I found that both the number of individuals of the rarest species (m) and the proportion of species represented by a single individual in samples of species assemblages (Φ) were strongly related to climate. Moreover, global variation in species richness was more strongly related to these measures of rarity than to climate. I propose that variation in the shape of the log-normal species abundance distribution is responsible for global gradients of species richness: rare species (reflected in m and Φ) persist better in benign climates. Even though body mass frequency distributions of assemblages show convergent patterns in relation to a set of a few environmental variables, the question remains as to what processes are responsible for creating the geographical variation in the body-size distribution of species. Several mechanisms (e.g. heat conservation and resource availability hypotheses) have been proposed to explain this variation. Chapter 5 tested and found no empirical support for the predictions derived from each of these mechanisms; I showed that species of all sizes occur across the entire temperature gradient. In conclusion, assemblage structure among various taxonomic groups across broad spatial scales relate in similar ways to a set of a few environmental variables, primarily mean annual temperature and mean annual precipitation. While the exact mechanisms are still unknown, I hypothesize several to explain the patterns of convergent assembly. Résumé Un but important de l'écologie est d'identifier et d'expliquer la variation de premier ordre dans les caractéristiques des assemblages d'espèces. Un des patrons ayant déjà été identifié par les écologistes, c'est que la variation mondiale de la richesse en espèces est liée à la variation du climat, de l'aire et de la topographie. Est-ce que d'autres caractéristiques des assemblages d'espèces peuvent être reliées à ces mêmes variables? Le but de cette thèse est de déterminer si la structure des assemblages d'espèces, ici définie comme la distribution des fréquences de masse corporelle ainsi que la distribution d'abondances des espèces, est reliée de manière convergente à un petit ensemble de variables environnementales, et ce, partout dans le monde. D'abord, j'ai déterminé que, pour les mammifères et les arbres, la majorité de la variation géographique dans la structure des assemblages d'espèces est reliée statistiquement à température, précipitation, et l’hétérogénéité du couvert végétal , et ce, de manière convergente pour l'Amérique du Nord et du Sud. Je me suis ensuite penché sur l'assemblage des oiseaux sur les îles et les continents. Malgré les larges différences évolutives et écologiques qui distinguent les îles des continents, je démontre que la majorité de la variation dans la structure des assemblages d'oiseaux dépend de la température, la précipitation, la superficie et l’isolation de façon congruente sur les îles et les continents. Frank Preston a modélisé la richesse en espèces d'une localité, basée sur le nombre total d'individus ainsi que le nombre d'individus de l’espèce la plus rare. En s'appuyant sur les modèles de Preston, Chapître 3 propose une nouvelle hypothèse voulant que les gradients de diversité dépendent des gradients du nombre d'individus de l’espèce la plus rare. Celle-ci dépend des gradients de température et de précipitation. Cette hypothèse repose sur le postulat que la distribution d’abondances des espèces dépend de la température et la précipitation, et ce, de la même manière n’importe où au monde. J’ai mis en évidence que le nombre d’individus de l’espèce la plus rare (m), ainsi que la proportion d’espèces représentées par un individu unique () dans des échantillons locaux étaient fortement reliés au climat. D’ailleurs, la variation globale de la richesse en espèces était plus fortement reliée à ces indices de rareté qu’au climat. Je propose que la variation dans la forme de la distribution log-normale d’abondances d’individus soit responsable des gradients mondiaux de richesse en espèces. En d’autres mots, les espèces rares (indiquées par m et ) persistent mieux dans des climats bénins. Malgré que la distribution des fréquences de masse corporelle des assemblages d'espèces soit liée de manière convergente à seulement quelques variables environnementales, la question demeure à savoir quels processus sont responsables des gradients géographiques de variation en masse corporelle des espèces. Plusieurs mécanismes ont été proposés pour expliquer cette variation. Dans Chapitre 5, j'ai testé les prédictions dérivées de chacun de ces mécanismes sans trouver de support empirique pour aucun. Je démontre aussi que des espèces de toutes tailles se retrouvent sur le gradient de température en entier. En conclusion, la structure des assemblages d'espèces, pour différents groupes taxonomiques et à travers le monde, est liée de façon similaire à un petit nombre de variables environnementales. Bien que les mécanismes soient encore inconnus, j'en propose plusieurs pouvant expliquer ces patrons d'assemblages convergents.

An important goal of ecological studies is to identify and explain patterns or variation in species assemblages. Ecologists have discovered that global variation in the number of species in an assemblage relates strongly to climate, area, and topographic variability in terrestrial environments. Is the same true for other characteristics of species assemblages? The focus of this thesis is to determine whether species assemblage structure, defined primarily as the body mass frequency distributions and species abundance distributions relate in convergent ways to a set of a few environmental variables across broad spatial scales. First, I found that for mammals and trees most of their geographic variation across North and South America in assemblage structure is statistically related to temperature, precipitation, and habitat heterogeneity (e.g. different vegetation types) in convergent ways. I then examined bird assemblages across islands and continents. Despite the evolutionary and ecological differences between island and continental assemblages, I found that much of the variation in bird assemblage structure depends on temperature, precipitation, land area, and island isolation in congruent patterns in continent and island bird assemblages. Frank Preston modeled species richness based on the total number of individuals and the number of individuals of the rarest species. Building on Preston’s model, Chapter 2 hypothesized that gradients of diversity correlate with gradients in the number of individuals of the rarest species, which in turn are driven by gradients in temperature and precipitation. This hypothesis assumes that species abundance distributions relate to temperature and precipitation in similar ways anywhere in the world. I found that both the number of individuals of the rarest species (m) and the proportion of species represented by a single individual in samples of species assemblages (Φ) were strongly related to climate. Moreover, global variation in species richness was more strongly related to these measures of rarity than to climate. I propose that variation in the shape of the log-normal species abundance distribution is responsible for global gradients of species richness: rare species (reflected in m and Φ) persist better in benign climates. Even though body mass frequency distributions of assemblages show convergent patterns in relation to a set of a few environmental variables, the question remains as to what processes are responsible for creating the geographical variation in the body-size distribution of species. Several mechanisms (e.g. heat conservation and resource availability hypotheses) have been proposed to explain this variation. Chapter 5 tested and found no empirical support for the predictions derived from each of these mechanisms; I showed that species of all sizes occur across the entire temperature gradient. In conclusion, assemblage structure among various taxonomic groups across broad spatial scales relate in similar ways to a set of a few environmental variables, primarily mean annual temperature and mean annual precipitation. While the exact mechanisms are still unknown, I hypothesize several to explain the patterns of convergent assembly. Résumé Un but important de l'écologie est d'identifier et d'expliquer la variation de premier ordre dans les caractéristiques des assemblages d'espèces. Un des patrons ayant déjà été identifié par les écologistes, c'est que la variation mondiale de la richesse en espèces est liée à la variation du climat, de l'aire et de la topographie. Est-ce que d'autres caractéristiques des assemblages d'espèces peuvent être reliées à ces mêmes variables? Le but de cette thèse est de déterminer si la structure des assemblages d'espèces, ici définie comme la distribution des fréquences de masse corporelle ainsi que la distribution d'abondances des espèces, est reliée de manière convergente à un petit ensemble de variables environnementales, et ce, partout dans le monde. D'abord, j'ai déterminé que, pour les mammifères et les arbres, la majorité de la variation géographique dans la structure des assemblages d'espèces est reliée statistiquement à température, précipitation, et l’hétérogénéité du couvert végétal , et ce, de manière convergente pour l'Amérique du Nord et du Sud. Je me suis ensuite penché sur l'assemblage des oiseaux sur les îles et les continents. Malgré les larges différences évolutives et écologiques qui distinguent les îles des continents, je démontre que la majorité de la variation dans la structure des assemblages d'oiseaux dépend de la température, la précipitation, la superficie et l’isolation de façon congruente sur les îles et les continents. Frank Preston a modélisé la richesse en espèces d'une localité, basée sur le nombre total d'individus ainsi que le nombre d'individus de l’espèce la plus rare. En s'appuyant sur les modèles de Preston, Chapître 3 propose une nouvelle hypothèse voulant que les gradients de diversité dépendent des gradients du nombre d'individus de l’espèce la plus rare. Celle-ci dépend des gradients de température et de précipitation. Cette hypothèse repose sur le postulat que la distribution d’abondances des espèces dépend de la température et la précipitation, et ce, de la même manière n’importe où au monde. J’ai mis en évidence que le nombre d’individus de l’espèce la plus rare (m), ainsi que la proportion d’espèces représentées par un individu unique () dans des échantillons locaux étaient fortement reliés au climat. D’ailleurs, la variation globale de la richesse en espèces était plus fortement reliée à ces indices de rareté qu’au climat. Je propose que la variation dans la forme de la distribution log-normale d’abondances d’individus soit responsable des gradients mondiaux de richesse en espèces. En d’autres mots, les espèces rares (indiquées par m et ) persistent mieux dans des climats bénins. Malgré que la distribution des fréquences de masse corporelle des assemblages d'espèces soit liée de manière convergente à seulement quelques variables environnementales, la question demeure à savoir quels processus sont responsables des gradients géographiques de variation en masse corporelle des espèces. Plusieurs mécanismes ont été proposés pour expliquer cette variation. Dans Chapitre 5, j'ai testé les prédictions dérivées de chacun de ces mécanismes sans trouver de support empirique pour aucun. Je démontre aussi que des espèces de toutes tailles se retrouvent sur le gradient de température en entier. En conclusion, la structure des assemblages d'espèces, pour différents groupes taxonomiques et à travers le monde, est liée de façon similaire à un petit nombre de variables environnementales. Bien que les mécanismes soient encore inconnus, j'en propose plusieurs pouvant expliquer ces patrons d'assemblages convergents.

An important goal of ecological studies is to identify and explain patterns or variation in species assemblages. Ecologists have discovered that global variation in the number of species in an assemblage relates strongly to climate, area, and topographic variability in terrestrial environments. Is the same true for other characteristics of species assemblages? The focus of this thesis is to determine whether species assemblage structure, defined primarily as the body mass frequency distributions and species abundance distributions relate in convergent ways to a set of a few environmental variables across broad spatial scales. First, I found that for mammals and trees most of their geographic variation across North and South America in assemblage structure is statistically related to temperature, precipitation, and habitat heterogeneity (e.g. different vegetation types) in convergent ways. I then examined bird assemblages across islands and continents. Despite the evolutionary and ecological differences between island and continental assemblages, I found that much of the variation in bird assemblage structure depends on temperature, precipitation, land area, and island isolation in congruent patterns in continent and island bird assemblages. Frank Preston modeled species richness based on the total number of individuals and the number of individuals of the rarest species. Building on Preston’s model, Chapter 2 hypothesized that gradients of diversity correlate with gradients in the number of individuals of the rarest species, which in turn are driven by gradients in temperature and precipitation. This hypothesis assumes that species abundance distributions relate to temperature and precipitation in similar ways anywhere in the world. I found that both the number of individuals of the rarest species (m) and the proportion of species represented by a single individual in samples of species assemblages (Φ) were strongly related to climate. Moreover, global variation in species richness was more strongly related to these measures of rarity than to climate. I propose that variation in the shape of the log-normal species abundance distribution is responsible for global gradients of species richness: rare species (reflected in m and Φ) persist better in benign climates. Even though body mass frequency distributions of assemblages show convergent patterns in relation to a set of a few environmental variables, the question remains as to what processes are responsible for creating the geographical variation in the body-size distribution of species. Several mechanisms (e.g. heat conservation and resource availability hypotheses) have been proposed to explain this variation. Chapter 5 tested and found no empirical support for the predictions derived from each of these mechanisms; I showed that species of all sizes occur across the entire temperature gradient. In conclusion, assemblage structure among various taxonomic groups across broad spatial scales relate in similar ways to a set of a few environmental variables, primarily mean annual temperature and mean annual precipitation. While the exact mechanisms are still unknown, I hypothesize several to explain the patterns of convergent assembly. Résumé Un but important de l'écologie est d'identifier et d'expliquer la variation de premier ordre dans les caractéristiques des assemblages d'espèces. Un des patrons ayant déjà été identifié par les écologistes, c'est que la variation mondiale de la richesse en espèces est liée à la variation du climat, de l'aire et de la topographie. Est-ce que d'autres caractéristiques des assemblages d'espèces peuvent être reliées à ces mêmes variables? Le but de cette thèse est de déterminer si la structure des assemblages d'espèces, ici définie comme la distribution des fréquences de masse corporelle ainsi que la distribution d'abondances des espèces, est reliée de manière convergente à un petit ensemble de variables environnementales, et ce, partout dans le monde. D'abord, j'ai déterminé que, pour les mammifères et les arbres, la majorité de la variation géographique dans la structure des assemblages d'espèces est reliée statistiquement à température, précipitation, et l’hétérogénéité du couvert végétal , et ce, de manière convergente pour l'Amérique du Nord et du Sud. Je me suis ensuite penché sur l'assemblage des oiseaux sur les îles et les continents. Malgré les larges différences évolutives et écologiques qui distinguent les îles des continents, je démontre que la majorité de la variation dans la structure des assemblages d'oiseaux dépend de la température, la précipitation, la superficie et l’isolation de façon congruente sur les îles et les continents. Frank Preston a modélisé la richesse en espèces d'une localité, basée sur le nombre total d'individus ainsi que le nombre d'individus de l’espèce la plus rare. En s'appuyant sur les modèles de Preston, Chapître 3 propose une nouvelle hypothèse voulant que les gradients de diversité dépendent des gradients du nombre d'individus de l’espèce la plus rare. Celle-ci dépend des gradients de température et de précipitation. Cette hypothèse repose sur le postulat que la distribution d’abondances des espèces dépend de la température et la précipitation, et ce, de la même manière n’importe où au monde. J’ai mis en évidence que le nombre d’individus de l’espèce la plus rare (m), ainsi que la proportion d’espèces représentées par un individu unique () dans des échantillons locaux étaient fortement reliés au climat. D’ailleurs, la variation globale de la richesse en espèces était plus fortement reliée à ces indices de rareté qu’au climat. Je propose que la variation dans la forme de la distribution log-normale d’abondances d’individus soit responsable des gradients mondiaux de richesse en espèces. En d’autres mots, les espèces rares (indiquées par m et ) persistent mieux dans des climats bénins. Malgré que la distribution des fréquences de masse corporelle des assemblages d'espèces soit liée de manière convergente à seulement quelques variables environnementales, la question demeure à savoir quels processus sont responsables des gradients géographiques de variation en masse corporelle des espèces. Plusieurs mécanismes ont été proposés pour expliquer cette variation. Dans Chapitre 5, j'ai testé les prédictions dérivées de chacun de ces mécanismes sans trouver de support empirique pour aucun. Je démontre aussi que des espèces de toutes tailles se retrouvent sur le gradient de température en entier. En conclusion, la structure des assemblages d'espèces, pour différents groupes taxonomiques et à travers le monde, est liée de façon similaire à un petit nombre de variables environnementales. Bien que les mécanismes soient encore inconnus, j'en propose plusieurs pouvant expliquer ces patrons d'assemblages convergents.