Spelling suggestions: "subject:"accomplice"" "subject:"accomplies""
31 |
Joint criminal enterprise : die Entwicklung einer mittäterschaftlichen Zurechnungsfigur im Völkerstrafrecht /Haan, Verena. January 1900 (has links)
Thesis (doctoral)--Universität, Bremen, 2007. / Includes bibliographical references (p. [353]-356) and index.
|
32 |
The nature of association and dissociation for common purpose liabilityMakiwane, Paterson Nkosemntu 11 1900 (has links)
Since the pre-requisites for common-purpose liability where there was no prior agreement were
laid down in S V Mgedezi 1989 (1) SA 687 (A), the appellate division has moved to resolve related
controversial issues. These include the question whether a joiner-in is a perpetrator or
accomplice, and whether he should be convicted of murder or attempted murder.
It is the question of dissociation which has remained elusive. Courts accept that a person should
only be criminally liable when his dissociation from a common purpose takes place after the
commencement of execution stage is reached. My submission is that whether one dissociates himself
should be a question of fact, to be determined according to the circumstances of each case.
Such determination should pay close attention to the doctrine of proximity. Where a person
played a minor role, or acted under the influence of a dominant partner, this should be reflected
in the punishment imposed. / Criminal & Procedural Law / LL.M. (Criminal & Procedural Law)
|
33 |
Römischrechtliche Ausgangspunkte der strafrechtlichen Beteiligungslehre : Täterschaft und Teilnahme im römischen Strafrecht /Bock, Dennis. January 2006 (has links) (PDF)
Univ., Diss.--Kiel, 2006. / Literaturverz. S. [246] - 260.
|
34 |
The nature of association and dissociation for common purpose liabilityMakiwane, Paterson Nkosemntu 11 1900 (has links)
Since the pre-requisites for common-purpose liability where there was no prior agreement were
laid down in S V Mgedezi 1989 (1) SA 687 (A), the appellate division has moved to resolve related
controversial issues. These include the question whether a joiner-in is a perpetrator or
accomplice, and whether he should be convicted of murder or attempted murder.
It is the question of dissociation which has remained elusive. Courts accept that a person should
only be criminally liable when his dissociation from a common purpose takes place after the
commencement of execution stage is reached. My submission is that whether one dissociates himself
should be a question of fact, to be determined according to the circumstances of each case.
Such determination should pay close attention to the doctrine of proximity. Where a person
played a minor role, or acted under the influence of a dominant partner, this should be reflected
in the punishment imposed. / Criminal and Procedural Law / LL.M. (Criminal & Procedural Law)
|
35 |
Die Zeugnisverweigerungsrechte von Geistlichen und kirchlichen Mitarbeitern /Fischedick, Walter. January 2006 (has links) (PDF)
Univ., Diss.-2005--Frankfurt (Main), 2004. / Literaturverz. S. 145 - 172.
|
Page generated in 0.0455 seconds