21 |
Analysis of UH-60 Blackhawk safety controls using value focused thinking and Monte Carlo simulationGallan, Roger D. January 2000 (has links)
Thesis (M.S.)--Air Force Institute of Technology, 2000. / "AFIT/GOA/ENS/00M-3." Includes bibliographical references (p. 130-131).
|
22 |
Die Enthaftungsklausel im Lufttransportvertrag /Haidn, Carl, January 1900 (has links)
Thesis (doctoral)--Universität Kiel.
|
23 |
Grundeigentum und Luftschiffahrt : unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Schadensersatzpflicht des Luftschiffes /Lange, Kurth. January 1913 (has links)
Thesis (doctoral)--Universität Erlangen, 1913. / Includes bibliographical references (p. [vii]-x).
|
24 |
Aviation insurance in international air transportHalter, Marc Rémy. January 2006 (has links)
No description available.
|
25 |
The Liability of Aircraft Manufactures : A Study of the Present System and a Proposal for a New ApproachKhouri, Ghalib Helal January 1980 (has links)
Note:
|
26 |
Protection of victims in the exercise of actions against air carriers.Miller, Georgette. January 1972 (has links)
No description available.
|
27 |
Protection of victims in the exercise of actions against air carriers.Miller, Georgette. January 1972 (has links)
No description available.
|
28 |
Diyah as a third dimension to air carrier liability conventionsNaji, Alaa A. January 2006 (has links)
No description available.
|
29 |
A paradigmatic framework for flight safetyRoutledge, Garry L. 26 April 1991 (has links)
Statistically, travel by air is one of the safest forms of transportation. Yet we
continue to experience aviation tragedies. Do we fully understand flight safety or is
there another way of looking at the problem? In this work a new way of approaching
the question of flight safety is developed, justified and illustrated. Traditional
methods are shown to be insufficient for a full understanding of flight safety. They
do not provide an adequate explanation of the context of aviation safety.
The issue is approached from a new perspective with a methodology based on
a philosophical understanding of explanation. For the examination of the context of
aviation safety traditional modes of scientific explanation are rejected in favor of a
paradigmatic explanation. A framework for explaining the context of accidents and
safety, in general, is synthesized from four broad paradigms which characterize its
patterned nature: the cognitive paradigm, the paradigm of normal accidents, the
paradigm of technology, and the paradigm of organizational complexes. The
development of the framework is supported by a wide diversity of literature from
philosophers, psychologists, social scientists and engineers. It is explicated with
numerous examples throughout. The framework is then compared with the traditional
mode of explanation through an extensive pedagogical case-study of a specific
accident.
The new framework is complementary to traditional approaches and new
insights are pointed up. Finally, some broad recommendations are made for the
community of professionals concerned with improving aviation safety. / Graduation date: 1991
|
30 |
A human systems integration perpective to evaluating Naval Aviation mishaps and developing intervention strategiesCowan, Shawn R. January 2009 (has links) (PDF)
Thesis (M.S. in Human Systems Integration)--Naval Postgraduate School, December 2009. / Thesis Advisor(s): O'Connor, Paul E. Second Reader: Miller, Nita Lewis. "December 2009." Description based on title screen as viewed on January 27, 2010. Author(s) subject terms: Naval Aviation, safety, mishap, human systems integration, human factors. Includes bibliographical references (p. 135-138). Also available in print.
|
Page generated in 0.0559 seconds