Submitted by Jorge Silva (jorgelmsilva@ufrrj.br) on 2018-03-15T18:51:08Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2017 - Gabriel C?ssia Fortuna.pdf: 1043987 bytes, checksum: 6a9354d53e0a589be62528a21844130c (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-03-15T18:51:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2017 - Gabriel C?ssia Fortuna.pdf: 1043987 bytes, checksum: 6a9354d53e0a589be62528a21844130c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-02-21 / CAPES / The work was carried out in the Integrated Agroecological Production System (SIPA), known as Fazendinha Agroecol?gica Km 47, in the city of Serop?dica - RJ, Brazil. The objective was to evaluate the productivity, development and economic viability of the okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) of summer, in regrowth driving and in winter cultivation, when submitted to automated irrigation slides and solar photovoltaic energy. An area of 225 m2 was used and the experimental design of randomized blocks with 4 irrigation slides was used, referring to different flows of drippers (2.0, 4.0, 6.0 and 8.0 Lh-1), Arranged in 5 blocks with 4 replicates, totalizing 20 experimental plots. Irrigation management was performed by the Simplified Irrigation Trigger (ASI). Two cultivation cycles were carried out and characterized as a summer crop (October 2015 to April 2016) and later regrowth (April to August 2016) and winter crop (June to September 2016). The total and commercial yields were evaluated in the three periods, as well as quality indices and crop development. The monetary costs were realized considering the costs of implantation and conduction of the crop and the selling prices practiced in the organic and conventional retail market (free markets) and in the wholesale market, being determined the net income, the rate of return and the index of profitability. The monetary costs of the photovoltaic system were calculated from the irradiance data during the cultivation period and the energy consumption of the pump. There was no significant difference between the treatments tested for all variables, except for total and commercial productivity in the eleventh week of winter cultivation. The analysis of monetary costs confirmed the production results, indicating that the lowest applied blade is responsible for the greater profitability and efficiency of water use, even commercializing the production by the values practiced in the conventional wholesale market. Likewise, there was a profitability also with the increment of the photovoltaic system in the total costs of the production system, being smaller, however, when compared to the use of the electric energy for the pumping of water. The minimum yields to be achieved in order to avoid losses were within the range of productivity expected for the crop, for the summer, winter and year of production in the three commercialization systems, even with the cost increase due to the use of solar energy. / O trabalho foi realizado no Sistema Integrado de Produ??o Agroecol?gica (SIPA), conhecido como Fazendinha Agroecol?gica Km 47, no munic?pio de Serop?dica ? RJ, e teve como objetivo avaliara produtividade, o desenvolvimento e a viabilidade econ?mica do quiabeiro (Abelmoschus esculentus) no cultivo de ver?o, na condu??o de rebrota e no cultivo de inverno, quando submetido a l?minas de irriga??o automatizada e energia solar fotovoltaica. Foi utilizada uma ?rea de 225 m2 e adotado o delineamento experimental de blocos ao acaso, com 4 l?minas de irriga??o, referentes a diferentes vaz?es de gotejadores (2,0; 4,0; 6,0 e 8,0 L.h-1), dispostas em 5 blocos com 4 repeti??es, totalizando 20 parcelas experimentais. O manejo da irriga??o foi realizado pelo Acionador Simplificado para Irriga??o (ASI). Dois ciclos de cultivo foram realizados e caracterizados como cultivo de ver?o (outubro de 2015 a abril de 2016) e posteriormente sua rebrota (abril a agosto de 2016) e pelo cultivo de inverno (de junho a setembro de 2016). Foram avaliadas nos tr?s per?odos, as produtividades total e comercial, al?m de ?ndices de qualidade e desenvolvimento da cultura. Os custos monet?rios foram realizados considerando os custos de implanta??o e condu??o da lavoura e os pre?os de venda praticados no mercado varejista org?nico e convencional (feiras livres) e no mercado atacadista, sendo determinados a renda l?quida, a taxa de retorno e o ?ndice de lucratividade. Os custos monet?rios do sistema fotovoltaico foram realizados a partir dos dados de irradi?ncia durante o per?odo de cultivo e do consumo energ?tico da bomba. N?o houve diferen?a significativa entre os tratamentos testados, para todas as vari?veis, exceto para a produtividade total e comercial na d?cima primeira semana do cultivo de inverno. A an?lise dos custos monet?rios confirmou os resultados de produ??o, indicando que a menor l?mina aplicada ? respons?vel pela maior lucratividade e efici?ncia do uso da ?gua, mesmo comercializando a produ??o pelos valores praticados no mercado atacadista convencional. Da mesma forma, houve rentabilidade tamb?m com o incremento do sistema fotovoltaico nos custos totais do sistema de produ??o, sendo menor, por?m, quando comparada ao uso da energia el?trica para o bombeamento de ?gua. As produtividades m?nimas a serem alcan?adas para que n?o ocorram preju?zos ficaram dentro da faixa de produtividade esperada para a cultura, para o cultivo de ver?o, inverno e ano de produ??o, nos tr?s sistemas de comercializa??o, mesmo com o incremento de custo devido ao emprego da energia solar.