AIM: The primary purpose of this thesis was to evaluate the pattern of changes to accommodation and phoria when pre-presbyopic individuals perform near work for 20 minutes with +2D lenses. In addition, the thesis also investigates the effect of the accommodative vergence cross-link (AV/A) and age on binocular adaptation to addition lenses. METHODS: Accommodation was measured using the PowerRefractor (Multichannel Systems, Germany) and phoria was measured using the modified Thorington Technique. Twenty four pre-presbyopic and emmetropic individuals (11 adults and 13 children) participated in the study. All participants fixated a near target at a distance of 33 cm for 20 minutes with +2D (lens condition) and without (no lens condition) +2D addition lenses. Binocular and monocular changes in accommodation and near phoria were measured at the outset and at 3, 6, 9, 15 and 20 minute intervals. RESULTS: Effect of +2D lenses on accommodation and phoria: The emmetropic adult participants exhibited lag of accommodation under the no lens condition (binocular: 0.51 ± 0.12D; monocular: 0.64 ± 0.15D) that were eliminated (under monocular viewing) and reversed (exceeded demand by 0.51 ± 0.11 D under binocular viewing condition) with the addition of +2D lenses. The near phoria showed a significant increase towards exophoria by 6 ± 0.56 ∆D upon introduction of +2D lenses. Sustained near viewing with +2 D lenses resulted in significant reduction of the binocular focus alone (not monocular focus) after 3 minutes of binocular viewing (magnitude of reduction: 0.24D; P<0.01). The exophoria also showed a concomitant reduction after 3 minutes of fixation at the near task (Magnitude of reduction: 3.6 ± 0.6 ∆D; P<0.001). The magnitude and rate of vergence adaptation, determined using an exponential function, was found to be 4.6 ± 0.21 ∆D and 2.12 minutes respectively for the emmetropic adult participants. Effect of age on vergence adaptation: A pattern of significant reduction in phoria and binocular focus similar to the adult participants was observed in young children. Analysis of the vergence adaptation curves in the two age groups did not show any significant difference in both the magnitude as well as the rate of phoria adaptation within the age range tested (Magnitude of adaptation - Adults: 4.65 ∆D; Children: 4.51 ∆D; P > 0.05; Time constants -Adults: 2.12 minutes: Children: 1.53 minutes, P > 0.05). Effect of AV/A ratio on vergence adaptation: The stimulus (St-AV/A) and the response AV/A (R-AV/A) ratios were determined and the participants were divided into two groups (low and high AV/A ratio) under both the conditions. The result indicated that, under both testing conditions (stimulus and response AV/A), the individuals with higher AV/A ratios demonstrated greater magnitudes of vergence adaptation than those individuals with lower ratios (Magnitude of adaptation: Low St-AV/A = 4.12 ∆D; Low R-AV/A= 4.25∆D; High St-AV/A = 4.88 ∆D; High R-AV/A = 4.65∆D; P<0.05) CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of near addition lenses initiated an increase in exophoria and convergence driven accommodation. Vergence adaptation occurred after 3 minutes of binocular viewing thus reducing exophoria and convergence driven accommodation. The magnitude and completeness of phoria adaptation were seen to depend on an individuals AV/A ratio with greater magnitude and incomplete adaptation observed in participants with higher AV/A ratios. Age, within the limits of the study did not appear to influence phoria adaptation with near addition lenses.

Thesis (M. Phil.)--Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, 2003. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 64-66). Also available in electronic version. Access restricted to campus users.

No description available.

Doctor of Philosophy / Binocular rivalry refers to the perceptual alternation that occurs while viewing incompatible images, in which one monocular image is dominant and the other is suppressed. Rivalry has been closely studied but the neural site at which it is initiated is still controversial. The central claim of this thesis is that primary visual cortex is responsible for its initiation. This claim is supported by evidence from four experimental studies. The first study (described in Chapter 4) introduces the methodology for measuring visual sensitivity during dominance and suppression and compares several methods to see which yields the greatest difference between these two sensitivities. Suppression depth was measured by comparing the discrimination thresholds to a brief test stimulus delivered during dominance and suppression phases. The deepest suppression was achieved after a learning period, with the test stimulus presented for 100 ms and with post-test masking. The second study (Chapter 5) compares two hypotheses for the mechanism of binocular rivalry. Under eye suppression, visibility decreases when the tested eye is being suppressed, regardless of the test stimulus’s features. Feature suppression, however, predicts that reduction of visibility is caused by suppression of a stimulus feature, no matter which eye is suppressed. Eye suppression claims that monocular channels in the visual system alternate between dominance and suppression, while Feature suppression assumes that the features of stimuli inhibit each other perceptually in the high-level cortex. The experiment used a test stimulus similar in features to one, but not the other, rivalry-inducing stimulus. Test sensitivity was found to be lowered when the test stimulus was presented to the eye whose rivalry-inducing stimulus was suppressed. Sensitivity was not lowered when the test stimulus was presented to the other eye, even when the test shared features with the suppressed stimulus. The conclusion is that feature suppression is weak or does not exist without eye suppression, and that rivalry therefore originates in the primary visual cortex. If binocular rivalry is initiated in the primary visual cortex, stimuli producing no coherent activity in that area should produce no rivalry. In the third study (Chapter 6) this idea was tested with rotating arrays of short-lifetime dots. The dots with the shortest lifetime produced an image with no rotation signal, and an infinite lifetime produced rigid rotation. Subjects could discriminate the rotation direction with high accuracy at all but the shortest lifetime. When the two eyes were presented with opposite directions of rotation, there was binocular rivalry only at the longest lifetimes. Stimuli with short lifetimes produce a coherent motion signal, since their direction can be discriminated, but do not produce rivalry. A simple interpretation of this observation is that binocular rivalry is initiated at a level in the visual hierarchy below that which supports the motion signal. The model supported by the results of previous chapters requires that binocular rivalry suppression be small in the primary visual cortex, and builds up as signals progress along the visual pathway. This model predicts that for judgements dependent on activity in high visual cortex: 1. Binocular rivalry suppression should be deep; 2. Responses should be contrast invariant. The fourth and last study (chapter 7) confirmed these predictions by measuring suppression depth in two ways. First, two similar forms were briefly presented to one eye: the difference in shapes required for their discrimination was substantially greater during suppression than during dominance. Second, the two forms were made sufficiently different in shape to allow easy discrimination at high contrast, and the contrast of these forms was lowered to find the discrimination threshold. The results in the second experiment showed that contrast sensitivity did not differ between the suppression and dominance states. This invariance in contrast sensitivity is interpreted in terms of steep contrast-response functions in cortex beyond the primary visual area. The work in this thesis supports the idea that binocular rivalry is a process distributed along the visual pathway. More importantly, the results provide several lines of evidence that binocular rivalry is initiated in primary visual cortex.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Carleton University, 2004. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 109-119). Also available in electronic format on the Internet.

Thesis (Ph.D.) - University of St Andrews, August 2007.

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Alabama at Birmingham, 2007. / Description based on contents viewed Oct. 6, 2008; title from PDF t.p. Includes bibliographical references (p. 51-52).

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Texas at El Paso, 2008. / Title from title screen. Vita. CD-ROM. Includes bibliographical references. Also available online.

Thesis (M.Sc.)--York University, 2007. Graduate Programme in Computer Science and Engineering. / Typescript. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 143-154). Also available on the Internet. MODE OF ACCESS via web browser by entering the following URL: http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&res_dat=xri:pqdiss&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:MR38754

Proefschrift--Utrecht. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 542-573).