Understanding the molecular basis of protein function is a challenging task that lays the foundation for the pharmacological intervention in many diseases originating in altered structural states of the involved proteins. Dissecting a complex functional machinery into modules is a promising approach to protein function. The motivation for this work was to identify minimal requirements for “local” switching processes in the function of multidomain proteins that can adopt a variety of structural substates of different biological activity or representing intermediates of a complex reaction path. For example, modular switches are involved in signal transduction, where receptors respond to ligand-activation by specific conformational changes that are allosterically transmitted to “effector recognition sites” distant from the actual ligand-binding site. Heptahelical receptors have attracted particular attention due to their ubiquitous role in a large variety of pharmacologically relevant processes. Although constituting switches in their own right, it has become clear through mutagenesis and functional studies that receptors exhibit substates of partial active/inactive structure that can explain biological phenotypes of different levels of activity. Here, the notion that microdomains undergo individual switching processes that are integrated in the overall response of structurally regulated proteins is addressed by studies on the molecular basis of proton-dependent (chemical) and force-dependent (mechanical) conformational transitions. A combination of peptide synthesis, biochemical analysis, and secondary structure sensitive spectroscopy (Infrared, Circular dichroism, Fluorescence) was used to prove the switching capability of putative functional modules derived from three selected proteins, in which conformational transitions determine their function in transmembrane signaling (rhodopsin), transmembrane transport (bacteriorhodopsin) and chemical force generation (kinesin-1). The data are then related to the phenotypes of the corresponding full length-systems. In the first two systems the chemical potential of protons is crucial in linking proton exchange reactions to transmembrane protein conformation. This work addresses the hypothesized involvement of lipid protein interactions in this linkage (1). It is shown here that the lipidic phase is a key player in coupling proton uptake at a highly conserved carboxylic acid (DRY motif located at the C-terminus of helix 3) to conformation during activation of class-1 G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) independently from ligand protein interactions and interhelical contacts. The data rationalize how evolutionary diversity underlying ligand-specifity can be reconciled with the conservation of a cytosolic ‘proton switch’, that is adapted to the general physical constraints of a lipidic bilayer described here for the prototypical class-1 GPCR rhodopsin (2). Whereas the exact sequence of modular switching events is of minor importance for rhodopsin as long as the final overall active conformation is reached, the related heptahelical light-transducing proton pump bacteriorhodopsin (bR), requires the precise relative timing in coupling protonation events to conformationtional switching at the cytosolic, transmembrane, and extracellular domains to guarantee vectorial proton transport. This study has focused on the cytosolic proton uptake site of this retinal protein whose proton exchange reactions at the cytosolic halfchannel resemble that of rhodopsin. It was a prime task in this work to monitor in real time the allosteric coupling between different protein regions. A novel powerful method based on the correlation of simultaneously recorded infrared absorption and fluorescence emission changes during bR function was established here (3), to study the switching kinetics in the cytosolic proton uptake domain relative to internal proton transfer reactions at the retinal and its counter ion. Using an uptake-impaired bR mutant the data proves the modular nature of domain couplings and shows that the energy barrier of the conformational transition in the cytosolic half but not its detailed structure is under the control of proton transfer reactions at the retinal Schiff base and its counter ion Asp85 (4). Despite the different functions of the two studied retinal proteins, the protonation is coupled to local switching mechanisms studied here at two levels of complexity, [a] a single carboxylic acid side chain acting as a lipid-dependent proton switch [b] a full-length system, where concerted modular regions orchestrate the functional coupling of proton translocation reactions. Switching on the level of an individual amino acid is shown to rely on localizable chemical properties (charge state, hydrophobicity, rotamer state). In contrast, switching processes involving longer stretches of amino acids are less understood, less generalizable, and can constitute switches of mechanical, rather than chemical nature. This applies particularly to molecular motors, where local structural switching processes are directly involved in force generation. A controversy exists with respect to the structural requirements for the cooperation of many molecular motors attached to a single cargo. The mechanical properties of the Hinge 1 domain of kinesin-1 linking the “neck” and motor domain to the “tail” were addressed here to complement single molecule data on torsional flexibility with secondary structure analysis and thermal stability of peptides derived from Hinge 1 (5). It is shown that the Hinge 1 exhibits an unexpected helix-forming propensity that resists thermal forces but unfolds under load. The data resolve the paradox that the hinge is required for motor cooperation, whereas it is dispensable for single motor processivity, clearly emphasizing the modular function of the holoprotein. However, the secondary-structural data reveal the functional importance of providing high compliance by force-dependent unfolding, i.e. in a fundamentally different way than disordered domains that are flexible but yet do not support cooperativity.

Understanding the molecular basis of protein function is a challenging task that lays the foundation for the pharmacological intervention in many diseases originating in altered structural states of the involved proteins. Dissecting a complex functional machinery into modules is a promising approach to protein function. The motivation for this work was to identify minimal requirements for “local” switching processes in the function of multidomain proteins that can adopt a variety of structural substates of different biological activity or representing intermediates of a complex reaction path. For example, modular switches are involved in signal transduction, where receptors respond to ligand-activation by specific conformational changes that are allosterically transmitted to “effector recognition sites” distant from the actual ligand-binding site. Heptahelical receptors have attracted particular attention due to their ubiquitous role in a large variety of pharmacologically relevant processes. Although constituting switches in their own right, it has become clear through mutagenesis and functional studies that receptors exhibit substates of partial active/inactive structure that can explain biological phenotypes of different levels of activity. Here, the notion that microdomains undergo individual switching processes that are integrated in the overall response of structurally regulated proteins is addressed by studies on the molecular basis of proton-dependent (chemical) and force-dependent (mechanical) conformational transitions. A combination of peptide synthesis, biochemical analysis, and secondary structure sensitive spectroscopy (Infrared, Circular dichroism, Fluorescence) was used to prove the switching capability of putative functional modules derived from three selected proteins, in which conformational transitions determine their function in transmembrane signaling (rhodopsin), transmembrane transport (bacteriorhodopsin) and chemical force generation (kinesin-1). The data are then related to the phenotypes of the corresponding full length-systems. In the first two systems the chemical potential of protons is crucial in linking proton exchange reactions to transmembrane protein conformation. This work addresses the hypothesized involvement of lipid protein interactions in this linkage (1). It is shown here that the lipidic phase is a key player in coupling proton uptake at a highly conserved carboxylic acid (DRY motif located at the C-terminus of helix 3) to conformation during activation of class-1 G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) independently from ligand protein interactions and interhelical contacts. The data rationalize how evolutionary diversity underlying ligand-specifity can be reconciled with the conservation of a cytosolic ‘proton switch’, that is adapted to the general physical constraints of a lipidic bilayer described here for the prototypical class-1 GPCR rhodopsin (2). Whereas the exact sequence of modular switching events is of minor importance for rhodopsin as long as the final overall active conformation is reached, the related heptahelical light-transducing proton pump bacteriorhodopsin (bR), requires the precise relative timing in coupling protonation events to conformationtional switching at the cytosolic, transmembrane, and extracellular domains to guarantee vectorial proton transport. This study has focused on the cytosolic proton uptake site of this retinal protein whose proton exchange reactions at the cytosolic halfchannel resemble that of rhodopsin. It was a prime task in this work to monitor in real time the allosteric coupling between different protein regions. A novel powerful method based on the correlation of simultaneously recorded infrared absorption and fluorescence emission changes during bR function was established here (3), to study the switching kinetics in the cytosolic proton uptake domain relative to internal proton transfer reactions at the retinal and its counter ion. Using an uptake-impaired bR mutant the data proves the modular nature of domain couplings and shows that the energy barrier of the conformational transition in the cytosolic half but not its detailed structure is under the control of proton transfer reactions at the retinal Schiff base and its counter ion Asp85 (4). Despite the different functions of the two studied retinal proteins, the protonation is coupled to local switching mechanisms studied here at two levels of complexity, [a] a single carboxylic acid side chain acting as a lipid-dependent proton switch [b] a full-length system, where concerted modular regions orchestrate the functional coupling of proton translocation reactions. Switching on the level of an individual amino acid is shown to rely on localizable chemical properties (charge state, hydrophobicity, rotamer state). In contrast, switching processes involving longer stretches of amino acids are less understood, less generalizable, and can constitute switches of mechanical, rather than chemical nature. This applies particularly to molecular motors, where local structural switching processes are directly involved in force generation. A controversy exists with respect to the structural requirements for the cooperation of many molecular motors attached to a single cargo. The mechanical properties of the Hinge 1 domain of kinesin-1 linking the “neck” and motor domain to the “tail” were addressed here to complement single molecule data on torsional flexibility with secondary structure analysis and thermal stability of peptides derived from Hinge 1 (5). It is shown that the Hinge 1 exhibits an unexpected helix-forming propensity that resists thermal forces but unfolds under load. The data resolve the paradox that the hinge is required for motor cooperation, whereas it is dispensable for single motor processivity, clearly emphasizing the modular function of the holoprotein. However, the secondary-structural data reveal the functional importance of providing high compliance by force-dependent unfolding, i.e. in a fundamentally different way than disordered domains that are flexible but yet do not support cooperativity.