No description available.

A wind tunnel investigation of an axisymmetric bluff body, known as a Goldschmied propulsor, was completed. This model conceptually combines boundary layer control and boundary layer ingestion into a single complementary system that is intended to use energy to reduce the axial force on the body by eliminating separation and increasing the pressure recovery aft of the body’s maximum thickness. The goal of the current project was to design, fabricate, and fully document the performance of a wind tunnel model incorporating the Goldschmied propulsor concept and complete an examination of its aerodynamic performance. The investigation took place at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo in the Aerospace Engineering Department’s subsonic 3ft by 4ft wind tunnel. The model is 38.5 inches in length and 13.5 inches in diameter with a discrete suction slot at 85% of the body length and an embedded propulsor that provides the suction flow, expelling it out of the model’s aft end. The experiment included measurements of surface pressure, total axial force, suction mass flow rate, fan thrust, fan torque, fan speed, and input fan power. The size of the suction slot and amount of input fan power were the main test variables in the 54 data point test matrix that was completed at a length Reynolds number of 1.34 million and a tunnel speed of 66 ft/s (20 m/s). The model was able to achieve fully attached flow on the aftbody with as little as 100W of input power and a net positive (forward) axial force coefficient of 0.12 with as little as 200W of input power. The model was also able to achieve a peak axial pressure force coefficient of 0.005 in the forward direction with an input power of 500W and a slot gap of 1.6% of the body length. A slightly lower axial pressure force coefficient of 0.0045 was achieved with only 200W of input power and a slot gap of 0.7% of the body length. The peak axial pressure force for most tested slot gaps occurred at about 200W of input power, and a slot gap of 0.7% of the body length resulted in the best overall performance for most input power settings. Two different suction slot configurations, a simple gap and a cusp, were tested, and no significant performance differences were seen between them. The pressure coefficient data showed similar trends as test data from 1956 of a similar model at higher Reynolds number, but it did not show complete agreement. Despite these positive aspects of the investigation, a simple power based comparison between the collected data and a conventional non-integrated propulsor does not show a performance improvement for the Goldschmied propulsor.

The offshore oil industry is engaged in the development of new floating platforms, such as Spar, semi-submersible, tension-leg, FPSO and monocolumn for the exploration of deep and ultra-deep waters. Some of these floating systems have circular cross sections (or cross sections of other bluff geometries) being susceptible to vortex-induced vibrations (VIV). Vortex shedding behind a bluff body can be altered, suppressed or controlled over a limited range of Reynolds numbers. Various flow-control techniques, which result in the reduction of drag and unsteady forces, have been suggested and tested in simple geometries. One such method is the moving-surface boundary layer control (MSBC), in which smaller control rotating cylinders are placed close to the bluff body. This method is considered as an inspiration for the present experimental investigation of VIV suppression for omni-directional flows. In this context, three different configurations have been assembled to compare the effect of suppression on a plain cylinder surrounded by two, four and eight control cylinders distributed symmetrically around it. Experiments were carried out with static models and models free to oscillate in one-degree-of-freedom with fixed and rotating control cylinders. Experiments with a plain cylinder were performed to serve as reference. Displacements, drag and lift forces were measured. The position of the control cylinders proved to be an important parameter to VIV suppression. Configurations with two control cylinders increased lift and drag forces. In contrast, configurations of four and eight control cylinders showed to be more effective to suppress VIV. Furthermore the results for all the cases of the configuration of eight fixed control cylinders presented a reduction of displacement amplitude, lift and drag forces when compared to a plain cylinder. However, when the control cylinders were actuated, the two cases with rotating control cylinders increased drag force when compared to fixed control cylinders. / A indústria offshore está envolvida no desenvolvimento de novas plataformas flutuantes como Spar, semi-submersível, TLP, FPSO e monocoluna para a exploração de águas profundas e ultra-profundas. Alguns destes sistemas flutuantes têm seções transversais circulares (ou de outras seções rombudas) sendo susceptíveis à vibrações induzidas por vórtices (VIV). A esteira de vórtices desprendida de um corpo rombudo pode ser alterada ou suprimida ao longo de uma faixa de número de Reynolds. Várias técnicas de controle do escoamento foram sugeridas e testadas em geometrias simples, resultando na redução de forças de sustentação e arrasto. Um desses métodos é o controle de camada limite por superfícies móveis (CCLSM), no qual cilindrinhos rotativos de controle são colocados próximos ao corpo rombudo. Neste trabalho, este método foi abordado através de uma investigação experimental como um supressor de VIV para o escoamento omnidirecional. Neste escopo três diferentes configurações foram montadas para comparar o efeito de supressão sobre um cilindro liso rodeado por dois, quatro e oito cilindros de controle, distribuídos simetricamente em torno dele. Foram realizados ensaios com o modelo estático, ensaios de VIV em um grau de liberdade com cilindros de controle fixos e rotativos. Foram medidos deslocamento e forças de sustentação e arrasto. Os resultados mostraram que a posição dos cilindros de controle é um parâmetro importante para a supressão de VIV. A configuração com dois cilindros de controle aumentou as forças de sustentação e arrasto. Diferentemente, as configurações de quatro e oito cilindros de controle mostraram-se mais eficazes para suprimir VIV. Além disso, todos os casos da configuração de oito cilindros de controle fixos apresentaram redução nas amplitudes de vibração e nas forças de sustentação e arrasto, quando comparados com um cilindro liso. No entanto, quando os cilindros de controle foram acionados para rotacionar, mostrou-se um aumento na força de arrasto em relação aos cilindros de controle fixos.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Ohio State University, 2007. / Title from first page of PDF file. Includes bibliographical references (p. 135-144).

The offshore oil industry is engaged in the development of new floating platforms, such as Spar, semi-submersible, tension-leg, FPSO and monocolumn for the exploration of deep and ultra-deep waters. Some of these floating systems have circular cross sections (or cross sections of other bluff geometries) being susceptible to vortex-induced vibrations (VIV). Vortex shedding behind a bluff body can be altered, suppressed or controlled over a limited range of Reynolds numbers. Various flow-control techniques, which result in the reduction of drag and unsteady forces, have been suggested and tested in simple geometries. One such method is the moving-surface boundary layer control (MSBC), in which smaller control rotating cylinders are placed close to the bluff body. This method is considered as an inspiration for the present experimental investigation of VIV suppression for omni-directional flows. In this context, three different configurations have been assembled to compare the effect of suppression on a plain cylinder surrounded by two, four and eight control cylinders distributed symmetrically around it. Experiments were carried out with static models and models free to oscillate in one-degree-of-freedom with fixed and rotating control cylinders. Experiments with a plain cylinder were performed to serve as reference. Displacements, drag and lift forces were measured. The position of the control cylinders proved to be an important parameter to VIV suppression. Configurations with two control cylinders increased lift and drag forces. In contrast, configurations of four and eight control cylinders showed to be more effective to suppress VIV. Furthermore the results for all the cases of the configuration of eight fixed control cylinders presented a reduction of displacement amplitude, lift and drag forces when compared to a plain cylinder. However, when the control cylinders were actuated, the two cases with rotating control cylinders increased drag force when compared to fixed control cylinders. / A indústria offshore está envolvida no desenvolvimento de novas plataformas flutuantes como Spar, semi-submersível, TLP, FPSO e monocoluna para a exploração de águas profundas e ultra-profundas. Alguns destes sistemas flutuantes têm seções transversais circulares (ou de outras seções rombudas) sendo susceptíveis à vibrações induzidas por vórtices (VIV). A esteira de vórtices desprendida de um corpo rombudo pode ser alterada ou suprimida ao longo de uma faixa de número de Reynolds. Várias técnicas de controle do escoamento foram sugeridas e testadas em geometrias simples, resultando na redução de forças de sustentação e arrasto. Um desses métodos é o controle de camada limite por superfícies móveis (CCLSM), no qual cilindrinhos rotativos de controle são colocados próximos ao corpo rombudo. Neste trabalho, este método foi abordado através de uma investigação experimental como um supressor de VIV para o escoamento omnidirecional. Neste escopo três diferentes configurações foram montadas para comparar o efeito de supressão sobre um cilindro liso rodeado por dois, quatro e oito cilindros de controle, distribuídos simetricamente em torno dele. Foram realizados ensaios com o modelo estático, ensaios de VIV em um grau de liberdade com cilindros de controle fixos e rotativos. Foram medidos deslocamento e forças de sustentação e arrasto. Os resultados mostraram que a posição dos cilindros de controle é um parâmetro importante para a supressão de VIV. A configuração com dois cilindros de controle aumentou as forças de sustentação e arrasto. Diferentemente, as configurações de quatro e oito cilindros de controle mostraram-se mais eficazes para suprimir VIV. Além disso, todos os casos da configuração de oito cilindros de controle fixos apresentaram redução nas amplitudes de vibração e nas forças de sustentação e arrasto, quando comparados com um cilindro liso. No entanto, quando os cilindros de controle foram acionados para rotacionar, mostrou-se um aumento na força de arrasto em relação aos cilindros de controle fixos.