• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • No language data
  • Tagged with
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

A comparison of the effects of online synchronous versus online asynchronous versus traditional approaches on learner achievement via education of Mississippi child care providers

Stanford, Carla Caldwell 09 August 2008 (has links)
The purpose of this quasi-experimental study was to compare three types of instruction: online synchronous, online asynchronous, and traditional, and assess which would yield more learner achievement. Participants for the online groups volunteered then were randomly assigned to either the online synchronous or the online asynchronous. Participants for the traditional group were also voluntary but were not randomly assigned; all that volunteered for the traditional group were accepted. In the final sample, a total of 96 Mississippi child care professionals completed the course Early Learning Guidelines: Lesson Plans and Thematic Units for Three Year Old Children: 31 in the online synchronous group, 32 in the online asynchronous group, and 33 in the traditional group. The dependent variable was learner achievement and the independent variable was type of instruction. The design of the study was pretest-posttest control group. Two hypotheses guided the study: (1) Participants in the synchronous online class will exhibit higher achievement than participants in the asynchronous class and (2) Participants in the asynchronous or the synchronous online class would exhibit achievement equal to or higher than the traditional group. Synchronous participants provided with instruction did perform higher than did the traditional participants. The synchronous and asynchronous groups were not statistically different, nor were the asynchronous and the traditional group.

Page generated in 0.1146 seconds