Dissertation submitted in partial compliance with the requirements for the Master's Degree in Technology: Chiropractic at the Durban University of Technology, 2009. / The low back and the lower limb are generally viewed as two isolated regions, however, there are many authors who believe that these two regions are functionally related. This is due to the two regions being connected to each other through the kinematic chain of the lower extremity. The lumbar spine is the link between the lower extremities and the trunk, and plays a significant role in the transfer of forces through the body via the kinematic chain. The physical link between the low back and the lower limb is supplied by the thoracolumbar fascia, which plays an important role in the transfer of forces between the spine, pelvis and legs. Although a relationship between the lower extremity and low back pain is often assumed, little research has been published to demonstrate the association. Most of the evidence so far has been anecdotal, without scientific research to support it. This study was designed to compare the relative effectiveness of lumbar spine manipulation, compared to combined lumbar spine and subtalar manipulation for the treatment of chronic mechanical low back pain, using subjective and objective measures, for the management of chronic mechanical low back pain. The study design was a quantitative clinical trial, using purposive sampling. It consisted of forty voluntary participants with chronic mechanical low back pain. There were two groups of twenty participants each, each of whom received six treatments within a three week period. Group A received manipulation of the lumbar spine only, whilst Group B received manipulation of both the lumbar spine and subtalar joint. The outcome measures included the response of the participants to the Numerical Pain Rating Scale-101 and the Quebec Low Back Pain and Disability Questionnaire. Objective data was obtained from three digital Algometer measures. Data was collected prior to the initial, third and sixth treatment. iv Statistically both groups showed improvements, subjectively and objectively, with regards to chronic mechanical low back pain. Inter-group testing for NRS over time showed no significant effect for both treatment groups. There was a significant treatment effect for Algometer Average TP1 while the treatment effect for Algometer Average TP2 was not significant. However, inter-group testing for the Quebec LBP over time showed no significant effect for both treatment groups. Inter-group analysis demonstrated no statistical significance between the two groups for subjective and objective measurements, thus suggesting that there is no additional benefit in treating the subtalar joint in the management of mechanical low back pain. Further studies will also benefit greatly from the use of larger sample sizes to improve statistical relevance of data.

Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Health at the Durban University of Technology in partial compliance with the requirements for the Master‟s Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, 2009. / The prevalence of neck pain in musculoskeletal practice is second only to that of low back pain (Vernon et al., 2007). There is a growing interest in neck pain research due to the escalating disability burden and compensation costs associated with neck pain (Côte et al., 2003). Manual therapies are commonly used in the treatment of neck pain (Côte et al., 2003). After an extensive literature review by Haldeman et al. (2008) they found that manual therapy techniques have some benefit but no one technique was clearly superior to the next. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare three commonly used manual therapy techniques in the treatment of chronic mechanical neck pain. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to compare three different manual therapy techniques (SMT, MET and PNF) which are commonly used in the treatment of chronic MNP in terms of range of motion, pain and disability. METHOD Forty-five patients with chronic mechanical neck pain were obtained through non-probability convenience sampling and assigned into one of three treatment groups (15 per group) using a computer generated randomized table. The three different treatment groups were: Spinal Manipulative Therapy (SMT), Muscle Energy Technique (MET) and Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF). Each group received six treatments over a period of three weeks with a follow-up consultation. Measurements were taken at the first, third and sixth treatment and at the follow-up consultation. SPSS version 15.0 was used to analyse the data. A p value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. An intra-group analysis was done using repeated measures ANOVA testing to assess the time effect for each outcome separately. For inter-group analyses the time x group interaction effect was assessed using repeated measures ANOVA testing, and profile plots were used to assess the trend and direction of the effects. RESULTS Intra-group analysis of the results revealed that all three groups improved significantly between the first and the final consultation, for all measures. Inter-group analysis of the data did not show any difference between the three groups by the end of the final consultation. However, extension range of motion appeared to improve slightly faster in the PNF group iv but it was not significant when compared to the other two groups. Therefore, there was no statistical significance between the three groups. CONCLUSION It was concluded that all three treatment groups responded equally to the treatment, thus, suggesting that MET or PNF techniques can be used if SMT is contra-indicated.

Dissertation submitted in partial compliance with the requirements for the Master’s Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, Durban University of Technology, 2007. / The aim of this research was to investigate the relative effectiveness of manipulation versus core rehabilitation in the treatment of acute mechanical low back pain in sedentary patients. Recent research has found that dysfunction of the primary core stabiliser muscles is linked with an increasing number of the general population suffering from low back pain; this is thought to be due to the fact that people in general are living more sedentary lifestyles. The Aims and Objectives of this study were to determine the relative effect of manipulation and core rehabilitation in sedentary patients suffering from acute mechanical low back pain in terms of subjective findings, objective findings and to determine any correlations between these findings Thirty-two participants, with acute low back pain participated in the study. They received treatment over a period of three weeks, two treatments in the first week, two treatments in the second week and a follow up seven days later. Group A received a spinal manipulation while Group B received core rehabilitation exercises. Readings were taken at three time points, namely visit one, three and five before the treatment, they included the following readings: Numerical Pain Rating Scale, Algometer, Roland Morris Low Back Pain and Disability Questionnaire, Biofeedback Stabiliser and the Surface EMG. The results showed that there was no differential (p<0.05) treatment effect between the two Groups, and that both Groups showed a clinical improvement in their low back pain. In conclusion, it appears that even though both these treatment protocols have very different mechanisms of action, both can be effective treatment protocols and that core rehabilitation exercises when properly performed are as effective as manipulation in the treatment of acute low back pain.

Mini-dissertation submitted in partial compliance with the requirements for the Masters Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, Durban University of Technology, 2010. / Iliotibial Band Friction Syndrome (ITBFS) is an overuse injury induced by friction of the iliotibial band (ITB) over the lateral epicondyle of the femur (LFE) with secondary inflammation. ITBFS is a prevalent condition and is the most common cause of lateral knee pain in long distance runners and cyclists. There are a significant number of aetiological factors related to ITBFS. As a result of this the general chiropractic approach to the treatment of ITBFS is multimodal and include interventions such as joint manipulation, cryotherapy, orthotics, massage, electrical stimulation, acupuncture type procedures and therapeutic exercise. Dry-needling is an effective therapy in the treatment of active Myofascial Trigger Points (MFTP’s) that are associated with ITBFS. However, the available literature suggests that to determine its efficacy, it should be performed in isolation. The association of sacroiliac joint dysfunction in ITBFS has also been addressed and are thought to co-exist and perpetuate one another. It is recommended that chiropractors include pelvic manipulation in their treatment protocol for ITBFS however there is a paucity of literature showing its effectiveness in the treatment of this condition. There appears to be a need for further research in the form of randomized controlled clinical trials with regard to chiropractic specific procedures, performed in isolation, in the treatment of ITBFS. Therefore this study aimed to add to the literature by assessing the effect of the sacroiliac joint manipulation and dry needling in the treatment of ITBFS. Objectives The study aimed to determine the comparative effectiveness of dry needling alone versus manipulation alone, as well as a combination of the two interventions in the treatment of ITBFS. Methods This study was a randomised, open label trial. 47 participants with ITBFS were divided into three groups, each group receiving a different intervention i.e.: group one received dry needling of the active MFTP’s in the Tensor Fascia Lata (TFL) and ITB, group two received sacroiliac joint manipulation, group three received a combination of the two interventions. Subjective measurements, in the form of the Numerical Pain Rating Scale-101 (NRS-101), and objective measurements, in the form of algometer readings in the TFL, ITB and Nobles Compression test as well as digital inclinometer readings of Modified Obers test, were utilised to determine the effects of the respective interventions. These measurements were recorded twice, once prior to commencing the treatment programme. These values were then evaluated to compare the efficacy of the different treatment interventions. Each participant received four treatments over a two week period. Results There were no statistically significant differences between the three treatment groups as they all seemed to parallel one another with regards to overall improvement in subjective and objective measurements (P<0.5). However on closer examination subtle differences between the groups were noted. An interesting endpoint is that the combination group did not fair the best throughout the study, which was contrary to the original hypothesis. The groups receiving only the single intervention appeared to fair marginally better over the combination group. A secondary endpoint that became evident during the study and on analysis of the data, was that hip joint instability must also be considered when treating ITBFS when there is concomitant sacroiliac joint dysfunction. Conclusion A decision needs to be made with regard to which intervention best suits the individual at the time. A combination therapy, which originally was thought to be the best treatment option, should possibly be reconsidered. Perhaps a single intervention of manipulation or dry needling should be decided upon. In totality, all intervention proved to be effective in the treatment of ITBFS.

Dissertation submitted in partial compliance with the requirements for the Master's Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, Durban University of Technology, 2010. / Cryotherapy is commonly used to decrease pain, swelling and disability in acute injury. The most common form traditionally used is ice packs, with menthol based cooling gels being increasingly used by physicians in place of ice. More recently companies are experimenting with adding herbs containing anti-inflammatory properties to these menthol based gels to enhance their effectiveness. There is a paucity of literature comparing different forms of cryotherapy to one another, and more experiments are necessary to determine if cooling gels containing menthol and cooling gels with menthol and anti-inflammatory herbs are comparable to that of conventional ice pack cryotherapy. Objectives To determine the relative effectiveness of an ice pack, a menthol based gel, a menthol based gel with herbal extracts (combination gel) and placebo gel in the treatment of an acute grade 1 or 2 inversion ankle sprains, in terms of subjective and objective measurements. Any adverse reactions were also noted. Method A placebo controlled randomised, single blinded clinical trial (n=48) was conducted. Participants were randomly allocated into one of the four groups. Each group consisted of 12 people between the ages of 18 and 45. Each participant had a case history, physical and ankle examination prior to being accepted to ensure that they met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. On the initial consultation the respective treatments were administered and participants were instructed on how to apply the gel or ice pack, which they were required to utilise at home three times per day for 3 days. Those receiving the gels were blinded as to which gel they were receiving, all gels looked and smelt the same. On the 4th day the participants returned for data collection and were instructed to stop using the treatment and return 7 days later for further data collection. Statistical analysis consisted of repeated measures of ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc tests, with a p-value of <0.05 considered statistically significant. Results Intra-group and inter-group analysis showed that all four groups had statistically significant improvements in terms of subjective and objective measurements. The results of the study demonstrated that the effects produced by the two cooling gels containing menthol, are comparable with those of conventional/traditional ice pack cryotherapy in the treatment of acute grade 1 or 2 inversion ankle sprains. No adverse reactions were reported. Conclusion This study found that all four treatment interventions were effective and safe in treating acute grade 1 and 2 inversion ankle sprains, however the ice pack and both cooling gel groups appear to statistically significantly improve treatment outcomes at a similarly higher rate when compared to the placebo gel group.

Dissertation submitted in partial compliance with the requirements for the Master's Degree in Technology, Durban University of Technology, 2010. / Episodic Tension–type headache (ETTH), which has a high prevalence, is the most common headache. Manual therapeutic approaches towards Episodic Tension-Type Headaches (ETTHs) have not been fully explored. However, cervical spine manipulation (CSM) and dry needling are found to be successful modalities for the treatment of tension-type headache (TTH). Therefore, this study aims to determine the effectiveness of CSM alone, dry needling alone and CSM combined with dry needling in the treatment of ETTHs. Objectives The objectives of this study include: determining the effectiveness of CSM alone, dry needling alone and CSM combined with dry needling in terms of objective and subjective data for the treatment of ETTHs. Method Forty five participants suffering from ETTHs, between the ages of eighteen and fifty, were recruited through convenience sampling and were randomly allocated to one of three equal groups (15 per group). The three different groups were: (A); CSM alone, (B); dry needling alone and (C); CSM in addition to dry needling. The study took place over a period of four weeks involving six consultations. Each participant received a headache diary for the duration of the study. At the first consultation the participant received the headache diary and was monitored for one week before the treatments commenced. Thereafter, four treatments were administered over the next two weeks, depending on group allocation. Participants were also monitored with the headache diary for one week after the last treatment. The objective data for each participant consisted of cervical range of motion (CROM) and pressure–pain threshold readings, measured using a CROM goniometer and an algometer respectively. The subjective data for each participant was collected using a headache diary and a headache questionnaire/disability index. SAS version 9.1.3 was used to analyse the data. A p value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results A decrease in headache duration, frequency, intensity and severity and increases in CROM and algometer measurements were observed in all groups. However, no statistically significant differences were found between the three groups in terms of objective and subjective measurements although, a statistically significant improvement from consultation five to six was found in Group C in terms of headache disability. Conclusion CSM and dry needling, used in isolation or in combination are effective in the treatment of ETTHs although Group C did show superiority over the other groups in the long term with respect to the disability index.

Dissertation submitted in partial compliance with the requirements for the Master’s Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, Durban University of Technology, 2011. / BACKGROUND: Plain film radiography is the most common imaging technique requested by chiropractors to assist in the management of patients with musculoskeletal complaints. There is a paucity literature indicating that chiropractors’ interpretive radiographic skills are consistently able to achieve the same outcome given a particular set of radiographs. An important indication for the use of radiography in chiropractic is to exclude any possible contraindications to spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) that could cause serious injury to a patient if it is left unmodified or excluded as a treatment option. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to investigate the inter- and intra-examiner reliability of chiropractor’s diagnosis on cervical spine radiographs. Additionally, the effect of clinical history added to the radiographs was assessed. METHODS: Inter- and intra-examiner evaluations occurred on two consecutive readings of 30 radiographs by six qualified chiropractors. No clinical history was given during Round One, but was available during Round Two. RESULTS: The inter-observer agreement for categorisation and management went from “poor agreement” in Round One (Κ=0.1962 and Κ=0.1996 respectively) to “fair agreement” (Κ= 0.2041 and Κ=0.2036 respectively) beyond that expected by chance in Round Two. Identification remained “fair agreement” beyond that expected by chance over both rounds (Κ=0.3113 and Κ=0.2159). Sensitivity at Round One was 94.4% and the specificity was 61.1%. At Round Two the sensitivity had decreased to 93.8% and the specificity had decreased to 50%. There was no significant difference between the accuracy of the Round One and Round Two results for categorisation (p=0.243) and management (p=0.220), but there was a clinical difference for identification (p=0.014). iii CONCLUSION: Differences in the result were small indicating clinical relevance with regards to inter-examiner reliability was fair in most instances. Although clinical history did not influence categorisation or management, it did improve accuracy of identification of pathology. Chiropractors successfully identified between 93.8% and 94.4% of abnormal radiographic findings demonstrating that chiropractors use of radiographs as a diagnostic tool when looking for contraindications to spinal manipulative therapy was sensitive. This demonstrates that its use as a diagnostic tool for contraindications to spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is sensitive.

Dissertation submitted in partial compliance with the requirements for the Master's Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, Durban University of Technology, 2011. / Background: Wong and Deyo (2001) believe that 98% of the LBP cases are musculoskeletal (mechanical) in origin and 51,7% of these individuals are chronic sufferers (Andersson, 1999). Weak spinal stability muscles have shown to be an aetiological cause (Chok, Lee and Latimer, 1999). Wolff, Weinik and Maitin (2003) agree a combination of brace aided pelvic stabilization combined with a spinal stability programme may be the best treatment intervention for chronic low back pain (CLBP). Objective: The purpose of this research was to determine the relative effectiveness of three treatment protocols with (Group A-Groovi-SI-Belt®; Group B-standard SI belt) and without (Group C-control) brace aided pelvic stabilization in patients with CLBP. Method: Forty-six patients suffering from CLBP were randomly allocated to one of the three treatment groups. A spinal stability programme was progressively taught and enforced in all three groups. Weekly follow-up consultations were required to assess subjective and objective outcomes of the three treatment interventions. Outcomes were obtained by using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NRS); Quebec disability scale; Active straight leg raiser test; Biofeedback device and the static trunk extensor endurance test. Results: Data was analysed using the SPSS version 15.0 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, Ill, USA).Comparing pre and post outcome measurements using a p value <0.05 which was considered to be statistically significant. All three treatments improved most outcomes significantly over time. The Groovi-SI-Belt® showed non significant trends of quicker rates of improvement. . Conclusion: This study revealed that brace aided pelvic stabilization combined with a spinal stability programme was a beneficial treatment intervention with the Group A being superior to Group B.

Dissertation submitted in partial compliance with the requirements for the Master’s Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, Durban University of Technology, 2012. / Background: Attempts to determine the association between the radiographic and clinical findings of knee pathology have produced conflicting results. It is also not yet known how knee radiographs influence the conservative management of patients with knee pain. Objectives: 1. To determine the association between the clinical and radiographic diagnoses of knee pain. 2. To record the consultation at which a radiograph of the knee was requested by the student or clinician and the reasons thereof. 3. To record the suspected clinical diagnoses and management of the patients prior to referral for radiographs of the knee. 4. To determine the number of incidental radiographic findings in the selected radiographs. 5. To determine any change in the clinical diagnoses and management following radiographic reporting of the selected radiographs. Method: Radiographic and clinical data from 1 January 1997 to 31 December 2010 were retrospectively collected from knee radiographs and corresponding patient files from the archives of the Chiropractic Day Clinic (CDC). Statistical analysis included the use of percentages, mean, standard deviation, range and frequency counts for the descriptive objectives. Diagnoses were categorized into specific groups and to construct two-by-two tables of absence or presence of radiographic vs. clinical diagnosis for each specific diagnosis to determine the association indicator variables were used. Results: The overall agreement between the clinical and radiographic diagnoses was 85.5%. For degenerative joint disease there was a 97.8% agreement while in Osgood Schlatter’s disease the agreement was 100%, and in chondromalacia patella the agreement was 50%. However, there was no agreement between the clinical and radiographic diagnoses for each of the other specific conditions. Degenerative changes were the most common radiographic findings. The iv majority of the knee radiographs were requested at the initial consultation and as the length of treatment increased, the frequency of radiograph requests decreased. The most common reasons for referral for radiographs were to identify degenerative changes (47.5%) and to assess for unspecified pathology (37.4%). Of the 146 patients in this study, 125 patients did not have a change in diagnosis after radiographs were obtained which means that 85.6% of the diagnoses remained the same after radiographic examination. There was a wide range of treatment modalities utilized in the management of patients with knee pain, including soft tissue therapy, electrotherapeutic modalities and manual therapy (manipulation and mobilization). The use of manual therapy increased from 67.8% prior to radiographs being taken to 82.9% after radiographs were obtained. Conclusion: Knee radiographs were over-utilized at the CDC and the findings on radiography did not have much influence on the diagnosis and the management of the patient presenting with knee pain. The majority of the clinical diagnoses were degenerative causes of knee pain. / Durban University of Technology Research Fund

Dissertation submitted in partial compliance with the requirements for the Master’s Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, Durban University of Technology, 2012. / Background: Therapeutic dry needling is an established modality for the treatment of myofascial pain, whereas limited research on Kinesiotape® exists. Kinesiotaping® is becoming popular, with the main benefit of being non-invasive and long wearing, thereby extending the treatment to the patient. This study aimed to determine the relative effectiveness of these two treatment modalities in patients with myofascial pain syndrome of the Trapezius muscle. Methods: The study design was a quantitative prospective randomised clinical trial. Fifty patients were equally and randomly allocated into either the dry needling or Kinesiotape® groups. Each patient received two treatments on separate visits to the upper trapezius muscle. Follow-ups were scheduled two to four days after the previous visit. Subjective measures were the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Neck Disability Index (NDI), whilst objective measures were pain pressure threshold (PPT) and cervical range of motion (CROM). Results: Kinesiotape® demonstrated statistical significant treatments with the VAS (p < 0.001), NDI (p < 0.001) and PPT (p= 0.022) (95% CI). Dry needling showed statistical improvements in VAS (p= 0.001) and NDI (p < 0.001) only. Also, Kinesiotape® demonstrated a clinically significant improvement with the VAS when compared to the minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs). Trends of a superior treatment effect of Kinesiotape® over dry needling was observed in the VAS and PPT groups (p= 0.155; p= 0.428). Future studies could repeat the study with larger sample sizes to determine if these trends can be validated. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that Kinesiotape® was at least as effective as dry needling in the treatment of Myofascial Pain Syndrome. Therefore, Kinesiotaping® is a non-invasive alternative to dry needling. Kinesiotape® therapy resulted in a greater change in pain and disability scores than did dry-needling trigger point therapy, implying that Kinesiotape® may be a noninvasive alternative to dry needling.