The evolution and development of eyespot and non-eyespot colour pattern elements was studied in Vanessa butterflies using a phylogenetic approach. A Bayesian phylogeny of the genus Vanessa was reconstructed from 7750 DNA base pairs from 10 genes. Twenty-four non-eyespot and forty-four eyespot color pattern elements from the Nymphalid ground plan were defined and studied and their evolutionary history was traced on the Vanessa phylogeny. Ancestral character states were predicted and the direction of evolutionary changes was inferred for all characters. Five serially arranged eyespots were predicted for the ancestral Vanessa on all wing surfaces. Homologous eyespot and non-eyespot characters on the surfaces of the forewing were more similar than those on the surfaces of the hindwing. Homologous eyespot characters on the dorsal surfaces of fore and hindwings show more similarities than the ventral surfaces, in contrast to what was found for non-eyespot characters. Independent Contrast analysis was also used to study correlations between eyespot characters. Independent Contrast analysis revealed significant correlations between eyespots 2 and 5 and eyespots 3 and 4 on all wing surfaces. This consistency among highly variable eyespot characters suggested a structural hypothesis: the existence of a Far-Posterior (F-P) compartment boundary and organizer could be responsible for the observed correlations. This hypothesis was tested in several ways. First, examination of wing patterns across species from all families of butterflies revealed correspondence between wing cells 1 and 4 and between cells 2 and 3. Second, evaluation of spontaneous mitotic clones in butterflies and moths reveals a peak abundance of clonal boundaries along the vein dividing wing cells 2 and 3. Finally, experimentally generated FLP/FRT mitotic wing clones produced in Drosophila, reveal a clonal boundary posterior to the L5 wing vein, which is homologous to the vein dividing wing cells 3 and 4 in butterflies. Collectively, this suggests the existence of an additional compartment boundary associated with an organizer in wing cell 3 responsible for patterning the posterior portion of insect wings. A model is proposed that predicts that the wing developmental compartment boundaries produce unique combinations of gene expression for each wing sector, permitting eyespot individuation. / February 2016

The interplay between biochemical signals and mechanical processes during animal development is key for the formation of tissues and organs with distinct shapes and functions. An important step during the formation of many tissues is the formation of compartment boundaries which separate cells of different fates and functions. Compartment boundaries are lineage restrictions that are characterized by a straight morphology. Biochemical signaling across compartment boundaries induce the expression of morphogens in the cells along the boundaries. These morphogens then act at long-range to direct growth and patterning of the whole tissue. Compartment boundaries stabilize the position of morphogens and thereby contribute to proper tissue development. The straight morphology of compartment boundaries is challenged by cell rearrangements caused by cell division and tissue reshaping. Physical mechanisms are therefore required to maintain the straight morphology of compartment boundaries. The anteroposterior (A/P) compartment boundary in the developing Drosophila melanogaster wing is established by biochemical signals. Furthermore, mechanical processes are required to maintain the straight shape of the A/P boundary. Recent studies show that mechanical tension mediated by actomyosin motor proteins is increased along the A/P boundary. However, it was not understood how biochemical signals interact with mechanical processes to maintain the A/P boundary. Here I provide the first evidence that Hedgehog signaling regulates mechanical tension along the A/P boundary. I was able to show that differences in Hedgehog (Hh) signal transduction activity between the anterior and posterior compartments are necessary and sufficient to maintain the straight shape of the A/P boundary, which is crucial for patterning and growth of the adult wing. Moreover, differences in Hh signal transduction activity are necessary and sufficient for the increase in mechanical tension along the A/P boundary. In addition, differences in Hh signal transduction activity are sufficient to generate smooth borders and to increase mechanical tension along ectopic interfaces. Furthermore, the differential expression of the transmembrane protein Capricious is sufficient to increase mechanical tension along ectopic interfaces. It was previously suggested that mechanical tension is generated by an actomyosin-cable through which the increase in mechanical tension is transmitted between the junctions along the A/P boundary. Here I show that mechanical tension is generated locally at each cell bond and not transmitted between junctions by an actomyosin cable. My results provide new insights for our understanding of the interplay between biochemical signals and mechanical processes during animal development.

The interplay between biochemical signals and mechanical processes during animal development is key for the formation of tissues and organs with distinct shapes and functions. An important step during the formation of many tissues is the formation of compartment boundaries which separate cells of different fates and functions. Compartment boundaries are lineage restrictions that are characterized by a straight morphology. Biochemical signaling across compartment boundaries induce the expression of morphogens in the cells along the boundaries. These morphogens then act at long-range to direct growth and patterning of the whole tissue. Compartment boundaries stabilize the position of morphogens and thereby contribute to proper tissue development. The straight morphology of compartment boundaries is challenged by cell rearrangements caused by cell division and tissue reshaping. Physical mechanisms are therefore required to maintain the straight morphology of compartment boundaries. The anteroposterior (A/P) compartment boundary in the developing Drosophila melanogaster wing is established by biochemical signals. Furthermore, mechanical processes are required to maintain the straight shape of the A/P boundary. Recent studies show that mechanical tension mediated by actomyosin motor proteins is increased along the A/P boundary. However, it was not understood how biochemical signals interact with mechanical processes to maintain the A/P boundary. Here I provide the first evidence that Hedgehog signaling regulates mechanical tension along the A/P boundary. I was able to show that differences in Hedgehog (Hh) signal transduction activity between the anterior and posterior compartments are necessary and sufficient to maintain the straight shape of the A/P boundary, which is crucial for patterning and growth of the adult wing. Moreover, differences in Hh signal transduction activity are necessary and sufficient for the increase in mechanical tension along the A/P boundary. In addition, differences in Hh signal transduction activity are sufficient to generate smooth borders and to increase mechanical tension along ectopic interfaces. Furthermore, the differential expression of the transmembrane protein Capricious is sufficient to increase mechanical tension along ectopic interfaces. It was previously suggested that mechanical tension is generated by an actomyosin-cable through which the increase in mechanical tension is transmitted between the junctions along the A/P boundary. Here I show that mechanical tension is generated locally at each cell bond and not transmitted between junctions by an actomyosin cable. My results provide new insights for our understanding of the interplay between biochemical signals and mechanical processes during animal development.

Decapentaplegic (Dpp), a member of the TGF-[Beta] superfamily, acts as a morphogen to direct cell differentiation, determine cell fate and promote cell survival and proliferation in Drosophila wing development. To investigate the role of Dpp in Drosophila wing development, three aspects of the patterning role of Dpp have been analyzed. First, I investigated the cellular responses to Dpp signaling by a loss of function strategy. The consequences of lacking Dpp signal transduction on cell morphology and tissue integrity were analyzed. Second, I investigated whether Dpp signaling is down-stream of Hh signaling to maintain the normal cell segregation at the A/P boundary by clonal analysis. Third, I investigated whether cross talk among the Hh, Dpp and Wg signaling pathways exists and what its relevance for wing patterning is. To investigate the role of Dpp in Drosophila wing development, the general strategies are to look at the phenotypes of loss-of-function and gain-of-function. Mutant clones lacking Dpp signal transduction by knock down Dpp receptor Thick veins (Tkv) do not survive in wing blade due to JNK dependent apoptosis. To get larger mutant clones for analysis, JNK pathway was inhibited by knock down bsk (encodes JNK) in mutant clones lacking Dpp signaling using FLP-FRT system. Clones double mutant for tkv and bsk did not undergo apoptosis, but recovered at very low frequencies compared to sibling clones. Here, I showed that the low recovery of tkv bsk double mutant clones are due to the extrusion of mutant cells. The extrusion of tkv bsk double mutant cells correlated with changes in the actin cytoskeleton and a dramatic loss of the apical microtubule web normally present in these cells. These results suggest that Dpp signaling is required for cell morphogenesis in Drosophila wing development. We propose that Dpp acts as a survival factor in the wing disc epithelium by orchestrating proper cytoskeletal organization and maintaining normal cell-cell contact. Drosophila wing is subdivided into anterior (A) and posterior (P) compartments. This developing into adjacent compartments is crucial for the patterning of Drosophila wing. Previous study has shown that Hedgehog (Hh) signaling is required in A cells to maintain the A/P boundary and is sufficient to specify A type cell sorting. A previous study has in addition implicated the signaling molecule Decapentaplegic (Dpp) in maintaining the A/P boundary. However, this study did not address whether and in which cells, A and/or P, Dpp signal transduction was required to maintain this boundary. Here, I have analyzed the role of components of the Dpp signal transduction pathway and the relation of Dpp and Hh signaling in maintaining the A/P boundary by clonal analysis. I showed that Dpp signaling mediated by the Dpp target gene, T-box protein Optomotor-blind (Omb), is required in A cells, but not in P cells, to maintain the normal position of the A/P boundary. During patterning formation, it is essential for cells to receive precise positional information to pattern the tissue. It has been proposed for a long time that different signaling pathways such as Hedgehog (Hh), Dpp and Wingless (Wg) signaling pathways provide positional information for tissue patterning in an integrated manner. Recently, evidence of interactions between Hh and Dpp as well as Wg and Hh signaling pathways has been reported in Drosophila wing. Here, I have identified additional interactions among Hh, Dpp and Notch/Wg signaling. We propose that the selector gene engrailed, Hh and Dpp signaling interact with each other to regulate target genes expression and thus to pattern the wing along the A/P axis. Further more, I showed that Dpp signaling is also participating in the patterning along the D/V axis by interaction with the selector gene apterous and Notch/Wg signaling.

Decapentaplegic (Dpp), a member of the TGF-[Beta] superfamily, acts as a morphogen to direct cell differentiation, determine cell fate and promote cell survival and proliferation in Drosophila wing development. To investigate the role of Dpp in Drosophila wing development, three aspects of the patterning role of Dpp have been analyzed. First, I investigated the cellular responses to Dpp signaling by a loss of function strategy. The consequences of lacking Dpp signal transduction on cell morphology and tissue integrity were analyzed. Second, I investigated whether Dpp signaling is down-stream of Hh signaling to maintain the normal cell segregation at the A/P boundary by clonal analysis. Third, I investigated whether cross talk among the Hh, Dpp and Wg signaling pathways exists and what its relevance for wing patterning is. To investigate the role of Dpp in Drosophila wing development, the general strategies are to look at the phenotypes of loss-of-function and gain-of-function. Mutant clones lacking Dpp signal transduction by knock down Dpp receptor Thick veins (Tkv) do not survive in wing blade due to JNK dependent apoptosis. To get larger mutant clones for analysis, JNK pathway was inhibited by knock down bsk (encodes JNK) in mutant clones lacking Dpp signaling using FLP-FRT system. Clones double mutant for tkv and bsk did not undergo apoptosis, but recovered at very low frequencies compared to sibling clones. Here, I showed that the low recovery of tkv bsk double mutant clones are due to the extrusion of mutant cells. The extrusion of tkv bsk double mutant cells correlated with changes in the actin cytoskeleton and a dramatic loss of the apical microtubule web normally present in these cells. These results suggest that Dpp signaling is required for cell morphogenesis in Drosophila wing development. We propose that Dpp acts as a survival factor in the wing disc epithelium by orchestrating proper cytoskeletal organization and maintaining normal cell-cell contact. Drosophila wing is subdivided into anterior (A) and posterior (P) compartments. This developing into adjacent compartments is crucial for the patterning of Drosophila wing. Previous study has shown that Hedgehog (Hh) signaling is required in A cells to maintain the A/P boundary and is sufficient to specify A type cell sorting. A previous study has in addition implicated the signaling molecule Decapentaplegic (Dpp) in maintaining the A/P boundary. However, this study did not address whether and in which cells, A and/or P, Dpp signal transduction was required to maintain this boundary. Here, I have analyzed the role of components of the Dpp signal transduction pathway and the relation of Dpp and Hh signaling in maintaining the A/P boundary by clonal analysis. I showed that Dpp signaling mediated by the Dpp target gene, T-box protein Optomotor-blind (Omb), is required in A cells, but not in P cells, to maintain the normal position of the A/P boundary. During patterning formation, it is essential for cells to receive precise positional information to pattern the tissue. It has been proposed for a long time that different signaling pathways such as Hedgehog (Hh), Dpp and Wingless (Wg) signaling pathways provide positional information for tissue patterning in an integrated manner. Recently, evidence of interactions between Hh and Dpp as well as Wg and Hh signaling pathways has been reported in Drosophila wing. Here, I have identified additional interactions among Hh, Dpp and Notch/Wg signaling. We propose that the selector gene engrailed, Hh and Dpp signaling interact with each other to regulate target genes expression and thus to pattern the wing along the A/P axis. Further more, I showed that Dpp signaling is also participating in the patterning along the D/V axis by interaction with the selector gene apterous and Notch/Wg signaling.