Submitted by Sandra Pereira (srpereira@ufrrj.br) on 2016-10-19T10:42:31Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2016 - Fl?vio Augusto Monteiro dos Santos.pdf: 4111195 bytes, checksum: ddcb80aea1817a4ed3fb05f0655b6ac4 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-10-19T10:42:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2016 - Fl?vio Augusto Monteiro dos Santos.pdf: 4111195 bytes, checksum: ddcb80aea1817a4ed3fb05f0655b6ac4 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-02-18 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPES / Forest restoration in pastures dominated by Urochloa spp. (brachiaria) has relatively high cost, mainly due to the difficulty of controlling the populations of these species. The objective of this study was to determine the most efficient form of control for the rapid formation of afforestation, with lower maintenance costs. five different strategies were compared to control brachiaria populations in forest restoration area in the city of Bom Jardim, RJ: T1 (weeding in bands along the lines of planting and mowing between the lines); T2 (weeding in ranges in plant rows and glyphosate applications between the lines); T3 (weeding in ranges in plant rows, mowing the supplementary cover lines and fertilization for forest species); T4 (weeding in total area and consortium with herbaceous legume nitrogen fixing) and T5 (weeding in ranges in plant rows, mowing and consortium with eucalyptus between the lines). Evaluated the growth in height, diameter at ground level and length of crown ten native species of the Atlantic, as well as all costs involved in the implementation and maintenance of each treatment up to 30 months after planting. In every age assessment, forest plants showed significantly higher growth in treatments intercropped with legumes and glyphosate application. When compared to the conventional management (T1), the group formed by the ten native species grew in height, diameter at ground level and in the pantry units that received the T4 (Legumes) and T2 (Glyphosate). Both the consortium with legumes (T4) and the application of glyphosate (T2) were effective strategies in training time reductions of deployed settlement, resulting in growth gain of 78% and 58% respectively compared to the conventional management (T1 ). However, the maintenance cost of the treatment consortium with legumes (T4) was almost six times greater than the treatment of glyphosate application (T2), indicating that the latter was also the most efficient strategy for promoting growth of indigenous species at lower cost maintenance. Supplementary fertilization increased maintenance costs and growth gain was not different from the conventional treatment (T1). The cultivation of eucalyptus in the planting lines not harmed the growth of native species up to 30 months after planting. The future use of eucalyptus wood has as predicate revenue generation in the areas intended for forest restoration. Once all forest species assessed, increased in gain when intercropped with legumes, and you can anticipate the formation of the population, this strategy should be enhanced to achieve gains in efficiency. The control strategy by applying glyphosate was the most efficient, so that with only two application of this herbicide was possible to form stands to catalyze forest restoration in state of Rio de Janeiro / A restaura??o florestal em ?reas de pastagens, dominadas por Urochloa spp. (braqui?rias) apresenta custo relativamente elevado, principalmente pela dificuldade de controle das popula??es destas esp?cies. O objetivo deste trabalho foi determinar a forma de controle mais eficaz para a r?pida forma??o do povoamento florestal, com menor custo de manuten??o. Foram comparadas cinco diferentes estrat?gias para controle de popula??es de braqui?ria em ?rea de restaura??o florestal no munic?pio de Bom Jardim, RJ: T1 (capina em faixas nas linhas de plantio e ro?adas nas entrelinhas); T2 (capina em faixas nas linhas de plantio e aplica??es do herbicida glyphosate nas entrelinhas); T3 (capina em faixas nas linhas de plantio, ro?ada nas entrelinhas e aduba??es de cobertura complementar para as esp?cies florestais); T4 (capina em ?rea total e cons?rcio com leguminosas herb?ceas fixadoras de nitrog?nio) e T5 (capina em faixas nas linhas de plantio, ro?adas e cons?rcio com eucalipto nas entrelinhas). Avaliou-se o crescimento em altura, di?metro ao n?vel do solo e comprimento de copa de dez esp?cies arb?reas nativas da Mata Atl?ntica, bem como todos os custos envolvidos na aplica??o e manuten??o de cada tratamento at? 30 meses ap?s o plantio. Em todas as ?pocas de avalia??o, as plantas florestais apresentaram crescimento significativamente superior nos tratamentos cons?rcio com leguminosas e de aplica??o de glyphosate. Quando comparadas com o manejo convencional (T1), o grupo formado pelas dez esp?cies florestais nativas cresceram mais em altura, di?metro ao n?vel do solo e de copa nas unidades que receberam o T4 (Leguminosas) e o T2 (Glyphosate). Tanto o cons?rcio com leguminosas (T4) quanto a aplica??o de glyphosate (T2) foram estrat?gias eficazes na redu??o de tempo de forma??o do povoamento implantado, resultando em ganho de crescimento de 78% e 58%, respectivamente, quando comparadas com o manejo convencional (T1). Entretanto, o custo de manuten??o no tratamento cons?rcio com leguminosas (T4) foi quase seis vezes maior que o tratamento de aplica??o de glyphosate (T2), indicando que esta ?ltima foi tamb?m a estrat?gia mais eficiente, uma vez que o r?pido crescimento das esp?cies nativas foi alcan?ado com menor custo de manuten??o. Aduba??es complementares aumentaram os custos de manuten??o e o ganho de crescimento n?o diferiu do tratamento convencional (T1). O cultivo do eucalipto nas entrelinhas de plantio n?o prejudicou o crescimento das esp?cies nativas at? os 30 meses ap?s o plantio. O uso futuro da madeira de eucalipto tem como predicativo a gera??o de receita nas ?reas destinadas ? restaura??o florestal. Uma vez que todas as esp?cies florestais avaliadas, apresentaram ganho em crescimento quando em cons?rcio com leguminosas, sendo poss?vel antecipar a forma??o do povoamento, esta estrat?gia deve ser aprimorada, visando ganhos em efici?ncia. A estrat?gia de controle por aplica??o de glyphosate foi a mais eficiente, de tal forma que com apenas duas aplica??o deste herbicida foi poss?vel formar povoamentos para catalisar a restaura??o florestal no estado do Rio de Janeiro.