No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

<p>Self control is affected by self-regulatory strength depletion (Hagger et al., 2010) as well as construal-level mindset (Fujita et al., 2006). However, two conflicting perspectives have emerged predicting differential interactive effects of construals and depletion. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the independent and interactive effects of construal levels and self-control strength in an effortful cycling exercise task. Using a randomized 2 X 2 factorial design, undergraduate participants (<em>N </em>= 67, <em>n</em> = 34 women) completed a baseline cycling task, followed by a self-control depletion manipulation (Stroop task vs. quiet rest; Wallace & Baumeister, 2002), a construal-level manipulation (category vs. exemplar naming task; Fujita et al., 2006), and then a 10-minute strenuous cycling test trial. The results showed no main effects for either self-control strength depletion or construal level (<em>p</em> > .20). However there was a near-significant interaction effect (<em>p </em>= .07) indicating the depleted group outperformed the non-depleted group in the low-construal condition, whereas the opposite effect occurred in the high-construal condition. The results provide novel insights of the effects of self-control strength depletion and construal mindsets on exercise performance and implications for the design of construal level and self-control depletion research.</p> / Master of Science (MSc)

Previous research on Temporal Self-Appraisal Theory demonstrated that people make downward comparisons to their past selves. Researchers have discussed this tendency to denigrate past selves as a self-esteem maintenance strategy; however, little research has been done on how people recall their past selves following active threats to their self-esteem. Reconstruing one’s past self for self-enhancement may lead to changes in construal level. I conducted three studies in which participants were randomly assigned to either an intelligence self-esteem threat or control condition and then tasked to recall an autobiographical memory, rate attributes of their recalled past self, and complete a measure of construal level. In the pilot study (N = 113), participants were free to recall any memory of their choosing. In Studies 1 and 2, participants recalled and rated two memories from early high-school: pre- and post-threat manipulation. Participants in Study 1 (N = 240) recalled their academic experience, while participants in Study 2 (N = 243) recalled their interpersonal relationships. A pattern emerged across studies suggesting that when people recall autobiographical memories related to the domain in which their self-esteem has been threatened (an academic memory and intelligence threat), threatened participants are more likely to denigrate their past selves (lower endorsement of positive self-attributes post-manipulation than pre-test) than controls in threat-relevant traits (competence, knowledge). This pattern is accompanied by an increased likelihood to recall positive transformations and periods of growth, as opposed to stability. However, a relationship with construal level was not observed. Further, when people recall autobiographical memories unrelated to the domain in which their self-esteem has been threatened (an interpersonal memory and intelligence threat), threatened participants are more likely to idealize their past selves (higher endorsement of positive self-attributes post-manipulation than pre-test) than controls in threat-irrelevant traits (likeable, attractive). However, this pattern was only observed for those who demonstrated fixed mindsets, emphasizing stability, and was not associated with an impact on construal level. / Psychology

<p dir="ltr">Humans in the modern world operate in tangled relational networks of people, technology, and data. In these interconnected networks, introducing new technologies with the capacity to sense, record, store, and transmit large quantities of data creates ripples that can reshape social and legal institutions. As networked “smart surveillance” products become more popular among consumers and law enforcement agencies alike, human experiences and expectations for the relationship between “public” and “private” shift as well. This study investigates public experiences of privacy in the context of smart neighborhood surveillance technologies. Using a mixed-methods approach featuring phenomenological methods, this study investigates changing understandings and meanings of privacy and security in public spaces. A complementary quantitative cognitive-linguistic analysis provides additional insight into possible underlying cognitive processes that shape and are shaped by these understandings. Participants used multiple schemata to interpret their experiences of privacy in public spaces, drawing on analogies to biology, property and transactions, and superstition; and used privacy as a commodity to negotiate a greater sense of security within their communities. Linguistic analysis revealed that smart doorbell nonadopters used different levels of verbal immediacy to discuss privacy and security, while no evidence of difference existed between accounts of privacy and security for smart doorbell adopters. Qualitative findings indicate that adopters conceptualizing privacy and security as indistinguishable may explain the observed difference.</p>