Meiosis is a specialized form of cell division in which haploid gametes are produced from diploid progenitors. This reduction in ploidy results from proper meiotic chromosome segregation and is ensured by crossover recombination events. Given their importance, it is no surprise that crossover formation is regulated in most eukaryotes. Crossover assurance is a regulatory mechanism that helps to ensure that each pair of chromosomes gets at least one crossover during meiosis. We seek to better understand how crossover assurance works. To do so, we have developed a system in which crossover formation between a pair of chromosomes is restricted to a defined region. If crossover assurance functions in this context, then crossovers should frequently form in this defined region. Our experiments involve three yeast strains: Homolog: diploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Homeolog: Diploid S. cerevisiae, but with one copy of III derived from S. paradoxus and one from S. cerevisiae. Homo-meolog: The homeolog strain, but with the HIS4 region of the S. paradoxus III replaced with the corresponding S. cerevisiae sequence. S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus are largely syntenic and have 80-90% sequence homology. This level of sequence divergence greatly reduces the incidence of meiotic crossing over. Thus, in the Homeolog strain chromosomes III will frequently fail to form crossovers. In the Homo-meolog strain, a defined region of homology surrounding HIS4 (a hotspot for meiotic recombination) exists in a chromosomal context of homeology. In the Homo-meolog strain, crossover assurance should result in a high incidence of crossover formation in the HIS4 region. By comparing the spectrum of meiotic recombination events in the HIS4 region in the three strains, we will gain insight into the means through which crossover assurance is enforced. These experiments are in the preliminary stage. Strain construction and data collection are ongoing, but our preliminary results demonstrate an elevated incidence of crossing over in the HIS4 region in the homo-meolog strain relative to both the homolog and homeolog strains. Spore viability patterns in the homo-meolog strain are not statistically distinguishable from that of the homolog strain, but are different from that of the homeolog strain. Taken together, these results suggest that the crossovers are targeted to the HIS4 region in the homo-meolog strain, possible through the action of a crossover assurance mechanism. Further analysis of the patterns of recombination in these strains may provide insight into the means through which this regulation is exerted.

Meiosis is the specialized process of cell division utilized during gametogenesis in all sexually reproducing eukaryotes, which consists of one round of DNA replication followed by two rounds of chromosome segregation and results in four haploid cells. Crossovers between homologous chromosomes promote proper alignment and segregation of chromosomes during meiosis. Crossover interference is a genetic phenomenon in which crossovers are non-randomly placed along chromosomes. Crossover assurance ensures that every homologous chromosome pair obtains at least one crossover during Prophase I. Crossovers physically connect homologous pairs, allowing spindle fibers to attach and separate homologs properly. However, some organisms have shown an ability to segregate chromosomes that fail to receive at least one crossover, a phenomenon termed distributive disjunction. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, mutation of either Tid1 or Ndj1 results in a similar defect in crossover interference. The overall number of crossovers is not substantially different from the wild type, however they are distributed more randomly with respect to each other. In this thesis, the roles of Tid1 and Ndj1 on crossover assurance and distributive disjunction have been further elucidated through use of knock-out mutants and tetrad dissection. To analyze meiotic chromosome segregation in isogenic tid1 and ndj1 strains, the spore viability of dissected tetrads was utilized as an indirect measure of nondisjunction events. An elevated number of 2- and 0- spore viable tetrads were seen in ndj1, but not tid1 yeast, confirming previous results. Elevated 2- and 0- spore viable tetrads are an indication of meiosis I (MI) nondisjunction, commonly resulting from failure of crossover formation. These results suggest crossover assurance is disrupted in njd1, but not tid1 mutants. However, MI chromosome segregation is an indirect readout of crossover formation; distributive disjunction, for example, can lead to proper segregation of achiasmate chromosomes. To determine if distributive disjunction is functional in yeast, wild type, tid1 and ndj1 versions of diploid yeast carrying a single homeologous pair of chromosomes were constructed. These strains have one chromosome (chr. III or V) replaced with one from a closely related species of yeast. The homeologous chromosome functionally replaces the homolog, however crossovers are significantly reduced between homeologs. A spore viability pattern typical of MI nondisjunction was detected in ndj1 mutants, but not in tid1 mutants. In the context of these homeologs, this pattern is suggestive of a role for Ndj1, but not Tid1, in distributive disjunction. Further, these results suggest that tid1 and ndj1 mutant yeast may not be different in their competence for crossover assurance. To directly assay competence for crossover assurance in native mutants, the incidence of E0 chromosome pairs (those lacking crossovers) was determined. To do this we assayed crossover formation along the length of chromosome III of isogenic wild type, ndj1 and tid1 mutant strains. The incidence of E0 chromosomes was comparably elevated in both tid1 and ndj1 mutant yeast, suggesting that crossover assurance is nonfunctional in both strains. We find evidence that supports the idea that interference and assurance are genetically linked. Our data also suggests that distributive disjunction may be genetically separable from some meiotic genes.