<p dir="ltr">Lithium-ion batteries are being used increasingly more often to provide power for systems that range all the way from common cell-phones and laptops to advanced electric automotive and aircraft vehicles. However, as is the case for all battery types, lithium-ion batteries are prone to naturally occurring degradation phenomenon that limit their effective use in these systems to a finite amount of time. This degradation is caused by a plethora of variables and conditions including things like environmental conditions, physical stress/strain on the body of the battery cell, and charge/discharge parameters and cycling. Accurately and reliably being able to predict this degradation behavior in battery systems is crucial for any party looking to implement and use battery powered systems. However, due to the complicated non-linear multivariable processes that affect battery degradation, this can be difficult to achieve. Compared to traditional methods of battery degradation prediction and modeling like equivalent circuit models and physics-based electrochemical models, data-driven machine learning tools have been shown to be able to handle predicting and classifying the complex nature of battery degradation without requiring any prior knowledge of the physical systems they are describing.</p><p dir="ltr">One of the most critical steps in developing these data-driven neural network algorithms is data procurement and preprocessing. Without large amounts of high-quality data, no matter how advanced and accurate the architecture is designed, the neural network prediction tool will not be as effective as one trained on high quality, vast quantities of data. This work aims to gather battery degradation data from a wide variety of sources and studies, examine how the data was produced, test the effectiveness of the data in the Interfacial Multiphysics Laboratory’s autoencoder based neural network tool CD-Net, and analyze the results to determine factors that make battery degradation datasets perform better for use in machine learning/deep learning tools. This work also aims to relate this work to other data-driven models by comparing the CD-Net model’s performance with the publicly available BEEP’s (Battery Evaluation and Early Prediction) ElasticNet model. The reported accuracy and prediction models from the CD-Net and ElasticNet tools demonstrate that larger datasets with actively selected training/testing designations and less errors in the data produce much higher quality neural networks that are much more reliable in estimating the state-of-health of lithium-ion battery systems. The results also demonstrate that data-driven models are much less effective when trained using data from multiple different cell chemistries, form factors, and cycling conditions compared to more congruent datasets when attempting to create a generalized prediction model applicable to multiple forms of battery cells and applications.</p>