Four denture base materials of poly(methyl methacrylate) (QC-20, Pladent-20, Hygenic, and Optilon-399) were prepared by convention water bath and microwave-energy cured methods. While the resin was in the dough stage, it was packed into two molds (65 mm ¡¦15 mm ¡¦10 mm) in the fiber reinforced plastic flask. The variation of temperature with time was recorded by two thermocouples during the microwave heating at 80, 160, and 240 watts, respectively. Microwave polymerization was carried out in the same equipment. The microwave flask containing the same size of resin blocks were processed at 80, 160, 240, and 560 watts for 15, 10, 7, and 2 min, separately. Then each flask was turned over, and cured an additional 2 min at 560 watts. In the case of water-bath method, the resin in the dough stage was packed in the Brass flask, and then cured at 70¢J for 9 hours. Ten specimens were prepared for each condition studied. The surface hardness, porosity, flexural properties and solubility of both process conditions were evaluated. The samples were sectioned by microtome and stained 2 % Osmiun tetroxide, then the morphology of Optilon-399 was observed by using TEM (Transmission electron microscopy) at 160 KV. The result indicate that the flexural strength for Optilon-399 specimens prepared by water-bath method was 20 MPa higher than that prepared in microwave oven, however, there were no obvious difference between the samples cured at different power. Phase separation in two different sizes was observed in all of the Optilon-399 specimens. The larger domain was with 0.18 mm~0.67 mm diameter has dispersed rubber phase surrounded by a rubber periphery. The smaller domain with 0.1 mm diameter is rich with rubber phase. The size and distribution of the larger domain were correlated with the microwave power and curing time. The sample cured by water-bath has the largest average domain diameter (0.395¡Ó0.068 mm). In the specimens prepared by microwave method, the domain size decreased with increasing power. In additions, the domain size varied across the specimen. The size difference between the largest and the smallest domain for specimens cured at 80W was 0.03 mm, and that for specimens cured at 560W was 0.05 mm. This indicated that the larger the power watt was, the higher the morphology difference was.