Spelling suggestions: "subject:"deuteronomy history"" "subject:"deuteronomistic history""
1 |
A TORAH E A OBRA HISTORIOGRÁFICA DEUTERONOMISTA: AS REVISÕES SOB A INFLUÊNCIA PERSA NO CONTEXTO SÓCIO-HISTÓRICO DO PÓS-EXÍLIOSotelo, Daniel Martins 26 June 2018 (has links)
Submitted by admin tede (tede@pucgoias.edu.br) on 2018-10-01T19:12:33Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
DANIEL MARTINS SOTELO.pdf: 1690135 bytes, checksum: 3a0e342d99bfc3b0cf4d1d97b4cce33a (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-10-01T19:12:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
DANIEL MARTINS SOTELO.pdf: 1690135 bytes, checksum: 3a0e342d99bfc3b0cf4d1d97b4cce33a (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2018-06-26 / SOTELO, Daniel Martins. The Torah and the Deuteronomic History: Revisions
under persian influence in the socio-historical context of the post- exilic period.
Post-Graduate Program Stricto sensu in Religious Studies Pontifical Catholic
University of Goiás, 2010.
The state of the question concerning the terminologies of the Tetrateuch,
Pentateuch, Hexateuch and Enneateuch is revisited in this thesis. The social,
political, religious, literary questions as well as the end of the persian empire are
emphasized. One can verify that during this period the texts were reformulated
due to Persian demands. It can be observed in this composition of texts that
there were evident modifications and insertions from priestly and deuteronomist
editions in the books of the Torah and the Former Prophets. The socio-historical
context and the documentary sources of the Persian Period are analyzed in order
to comprehend the reconstruction of the Torah texts and the Deuteronomic
History. These revisions are discussed in terms of the North American model of
the Canonical Approach, in terms of a Latin American reading of the Torah and
Deuteronomic History, in terms of the Law in and beyond Torah. The
reformulations of the writings of the Torah and Deuteronomic History are
described and the reformulations of these texts in the Post-Exilic Period. The
edition and the deuteronomist revisions in the writings of the Deuteronomic
History that occurred due to the influence of the Law and the socio-historical
context of this period as well as the later editions and the deuteronomist traditions
in the narratives of Samuel and Kings are studied together with later editions and
deuteronomist traditions of the Joshuah and Judges narratives. / SOTELO, Daniel Martins. A Torah e a Obra Historiográfica Deuteronomista:
As Revisões sob a Influência Persa no Contexto Sócio-Histórico do Pós-
Exílio. Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Ciências da Religião:
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás, 2010.
A tese revisita o estado de questão das terminologias do Tetrateuco, Pentateuco,
Hexateuco e Eneateuco. Enfatizam-se as questões sociais, políticas, religiosas,
literárias e o fim deste império persa. Verifica-se que nesse período os textos
foram reformulados em razão das exigências da política persa. Observa-se que,
nessa composição dos textos, houve modificações sensíveis e foram inseridos
textos de redações Sacerdotais e de redações Deuteronomistas nos livros da
Torah e dos Profetas Anteriores. Analisa-se o contexto sócio-histórico e as
fontes documentais no Período Persa para a compreensão das reconstruções
dos textos da Torah e da Obra Historiográfica Deuteronomista. Fala-se das
revisões a partir do modelo norte-americano do cannonical approach; da leitura
sobre a Torah e da Obra Historiográfica Deuteronomista a partir da America
Latina; da lei na Torah e para além dela. Descrevem-se as reformulações dos
escritos da Torah e da Obra Historiográfica Deuteronomista; as reformulações
desses textos no pós-exílio. Discutem-se a redação e as revisões
Deuteronomistas nos escritos da Obra Historiográfica Deuteronomista sob a
influência da lei e do contexto sócio-histórico do pós-exílio; as redações
posteriores e as tradições do Deuteronomista nas narrativas de Samuel e Reis;
as redações posteriores e a tradições Deuteronomistas nas narrativas de Josué
e Juízes.
|
2 |
The term berith (covenant) in the Historical and Wisdom Books of the Old TestamentLinington, Silvia 11 1900 (has links)
This work is concerned with the word berith (covenant) in the historical and wisdom books of the Old Testament, and continues research done in previous articles on berith in the Pentateuch and the prophetic literature. The main aim is to discuss in some detail the texts containing the word berith in the historical and wisdom books of the Old Testament and to examine the meaning and use of the word in these writings. The interrelationships between berith and other words in the contexts in which they appear are explored and explained. Finally, berith in the historical and wisdom books usually refers to one of the covenants of the Pentateuch, and which of these is applicable in each case will also be discussed. / Old Testament & Ancient NE / M.Th. (Old Testament)
|
3 |
The term berith (covenant) in the Historical and Wisdom Books of the Old TestamentLinington, Silvia 11 1900 (has links)
This work is concerned with the word berith (covenant) in the historical and wisdom books of the Old Testament, and continues research done in previous articles on berith in the Pentateuch and the prophetic literature. The main aim is to discuss in some detail the texts containing the word berith in the historical and wisdom books of the Old Testament and to examine the meaning and use of the word in these writings. The interrelationships between berith and other words in the contexts in which they appear are explored and explained. Finally, berith in the historical and wisdom books usually refers to one of the covenants of the Pentateuch, and which of these is applicable in each case will also be discussed. / Old Testament and Ancient NE / M.Th. (Old Testament)
|
4 |
2S 7,1-17 en contexte historique, évaluation de la mise en forme et de la transmission du texte dans le débat portant sur la tradition deutéronomisteWang, Wei 08 1900 (has links)
L’objectif de ce mémoire est de mettre en lumière la mise en forme, la réception et la transmission de 2S 7,1-17 à l’intérieur du débat qui a présentement cours autour de la rédaction deutéronomiste, ainsi que de vérifier le lien possible de ce texte avec l’évolution de la pensée théologique juive issue de l’édition deutéronomiste.
Notre recherche commence par établir un texte hébreu de travail fiable grâce à la critique textuelle. L’analyse syntaxique nous permet ensuite de proposer une traduction qui soit la plus fidèle possible au texte hébreu retenu afin de mieux comprendre le sens du texte dans sa langue originale. Nous abordons, dans le troisième chapitre, la question des différentes sources littéraires ayant pu servir à la composition du texte de 2S 7,1-17. L’exploration plus détaillée de quelques pistes qui sont apparues à la suite de la critique des sources et de la réception du texte de 2S 7,1-17 par le(s) Chroniste(s), nous permet de constater qu’à l’intérieur des traditions textuelles hébraïques, la prophétie de Nathan a évolué de façon significative dans le parcours des différentes traditions de relecture.
À partir des quatres étapes de recherches, nous dégageons les éléments qui pourraient être mis en lien avec les théories existantes dans le cadre de l’histoire deutéronomiste et mettons en lumière les forces et les faiblesses des solutions proposées. Les résultats de la recherche nous permettent de penser que l’intégration de la prophétie de Nathan dans la trame historique s’expliquerait par la nécessité d’éclairer une suite d’événements selon diverses perspectives théologiques. Ce n’est qu’à partir des conditions exiliques que nous aurions le texte de 2S 7,1-17 le plus tardif offrant une réflexion sur la première histoire d’Israël. Dans ce sens, la prophétie de Nathan prendrait toute sa valeur et son extension bien au-delà de la seule histoire personnelle de David ou de Salomon. / The principal objective of this thesis is to elucidate the source materials, the reception and the transmission of 2S 7,1-17 inside the debate concerning the Deuteronomic History, as well as to verify the possible link of the text with the evolution of the Jewish theology coming from the Deuteronomic edition.
Our research begins with textual criticism in order to establish a reliable text in the Hebrew language. Then a syntactic analysis allows us to propose an accurate translation and to better understand the meaning of the text in its original language. Taking into account the results from these two first chapters, we then deal with the question concerning the different literary sources which lie behind the text of 2S 7,1-17. A more detailed exploration of some issues ensuins the source criticism and the study of the reception of 2S 7,1-17 by the Chronicler(s), show that inside the Hebrew literal traditions, the prophecy of Nathan evolved significantly in different traditions.
Based on the four steps of research, we identify the elements that could be linked with the theories existing in the debate of the Deuteronomic History, and highlight the forces and the weaknesses of the proposed solutions. The research results allow us to think that the integration of the prophecy of Nathan into history could be explained by the necessity to clarify a sequence of events according to the diverse theological perspectives. It is in the conditions of the Exile that we have the latest text of 2S 7,1-17 offering a reflection on the first history of Israel. In this meaning, the prophecy of Nathan takes all its value and its extension beyond only the personal history of David or of Solomon.
|
5 |
2S 7,1-17 en contexte historique, évaluation de la mise en forme et de la transmission du texte dans le débat portant sur la tradition deutéronomisteWang, Wei 08 1900 (has links)
L’objectif de ce mémoire est de mettre en lumière la mise en forme, la réception et la transmission de 2S 7,1-17 à l’intérieur du débat qui a présentement cours autour de la rédaction deutéronomiste, ainsi que de vérifier le lien possible de ce texte avec l’évolution de la pensée théologique juive issue de l’édition deutéronomiste.
Notre recherche commence par établir un texte hébreu de travail fiable grâce à la critique textuelle. L’analyse syntaxique nous permet ensuite de proposer une traduction qui soit la plus fidèle possible au texte hébreu retenu afin de mieux comprendre le sens du texte dans sa langue originale. Nous abordons, dans le troisième chapitre, la question des différentes sources littéraires ayant pu servir à la composition du texte de 2S 7,1-17. L’exploration plus détaillée de quelques pistes qui sont apparues à la suite de la critique des sources et de la réception du texte de 2S 7,1-17 par le(s) Chroniste(s), nous permet de constater qu’à l’intérieur des traditions textuelles hébraïques, la prophétie de Nathan a évolué de façon significative dans le parcours des différentes traditions de relecture.
À partir des quatres étapes de recherches, nous dégageons les éléments qui pourraient être mis en lien avec les théories existantes dans le cadre de l’histoire deutéronomiste et mettons en lumière les forces et les faiblesses des solutions proposées. Les résultats de la recherche nous permettent de penser que l’intégration de la prophétie de Nathan dans la trame historique s’expliquerait par la nécessité d’éclairer une suite d’événements selon diverses perspectives théologiques. Ce n’est qu’à partir des conditions exiliques que nous aurions le texte de 2S 7,1-17 le plus tardif offrant une réflexion sur la première histoire d’Israël. Dans ce sens, la prophétie de Nathan prendrait toute sa valeur et son extension bien au-delà de la seule histoire personnelle de David ou de Salomon. / The principal objective of this thesis is to elucidate the source materials, the reception and the transmission of 2S 7,1-17 inside the debate concerning the Deuteronomic History, as well as to verify the possible link of the text with the evolution of the Jewish theology coming from the Deuteronomic edition.
Our research begins with textual criticism in order to establish a reliable text in the Hebrew language. Then a syntactic analysis allows us to propose an accurate translation and to better understand the meaning of the text in its original language. Taking into account the results from these two first chapters, we then deal with the question concerning the different literary sources which lie behind the text of 2S 7,1-17. A more detailed exploration of some issues ensuins the source criticism and the study of the reception of 2S 7,1-17 by the Chronicler(s), show that inside the Hebrew literal traditions, the prophecy of Nathan evolved significantly in different traditions.
Based on the four steps of research, we identify the elements that could be linked with the theories existing in the debate of the Deuteronomic History, and highlight the forces and the weaknesses of the proposed solutions. The research results allow us to think that the integration of the prophecy of Nathan into history could be explained by the necessity to clarify a sequence of events according to the diverse theological perspectives. It is in the conditions of the Exile that we have the latest text of 2S 7,1-17 offering a reflection on the first history of Israel. In this meaning, the prophecy of Nathan takes all its value and its extension beyond only the personal history of David or of Solomon.
|
6 |
The role of the priests in Israelite identity formation in the exilic/post-exilic period with special reference to Leviticus 19:1-19a / Rol van die priesters in die Israelitiese identiteitsvorming tydens die ballingskaps-/ na-ballingskapstydperk met spesiale verwysing na Levitikus 19:1-19aBeer, Leilani 07 1900 (has links)
Bibliography: leaves 289-298 / Source-criticism of the Pentateuch suggests that the priests (Source P) alone authored the
Holiness Code – the premise being that Source P forms one religious, literate and elite group
of several. Through the endeavor to redefine Israelite identity during the Neo-Babylonian
Empire of 626–539 BCE and the Achaemenid Persian Empire of 550–330 BCE, various
ideologies of Israelite identity were produced by various religious, literate and elite groups.
Possibly, the Holiness Code functions as the compromise reached between two such groups,
these being: the Shaphanites, and the Zadokites. Moreover, the Holiness Code functions as
the basis for the agreed identity of Israel as seen by the Shaphanites and the Zadokites.
Specifically, in Leviticus 19:1-19a – as being the Levitical decalogue of the Holiness Code,
and which forms the emphasis of this thesis – both Shaphanite and Zadokite ideologies are
expressed therein.
The Shaphanite ideology is expressed through the Mosaic tradition: i.e., through the Law;
and the Zadokite ideology is expressed through the Aaronide tradition: i.e., through the Cult.
In the debate between the supremacy of the Law, or the Cult – i.e., Moses or Aaron – the
ancient Near Eastern convention of the ‘rivalry between brothers’ is masterfully negotiated
in Leviticus 19:1-19a. / Old Testament and Ancient Near Eastern Studies / D. Phil. (Old Testament)
|
Page generated in 0.092 seconds