The present manuscript discusses the performance and emission benefits due to two diesel injections in diesel-ignited methane dual fuel Low Temperature Combustion (LTC). A Single Cylinder Research Engine (SCRE) adapted for diesel-ignited methane dual fuelling was operated at 1500 rev/min and 5 bar BMEP with 1.5 bar intake manifold pressure. The first injection was fixed at 310 CAD. A 2nd injection sweep timing was performed to determine the best 2nd injection timing (as 375 CAD) at a fixed Percentage Energy Substitution (PES 75%). The motivation to use a second late injection ATDC was to oxidize Unburnt Hydrocarbons (HC) generated from the dual fuel combustion of first injection. Finally, an injection pressure sweep (550-1300 bar) helped achieve simultaneous reduction of HC (56%) and CO (43%) emissions accompanied with increased IFCE (10%) and combustion efficiency (12%) w.r.t. the baseline single injection (at 310 CAD) of dual fuel LTC.

Diesel-ignited gasoline and diesel-ignited methane dual fuel combustion experiments were performed in a single-cylinder research engine (SCRE), outfitted with a common-rail diesel injection system and a stand-alone engine controller. Gasoline was injected in the intake port using a portuel injector, whereas methane was fumigated into the intake manifold. The engine was operated at a constant speed of 1500 rev/min, a constant load of 5.2 bar IMEP, and a constant gasoline/methane energy substitution of 80%. Parameters such as diesel injection timing (SOI), diesel injection pressure, and boost pressure were varied to quantify their impact on engine performance and engineout ISNOx, ISHC, ISCO, and smoke emissions. The change in combustion process from heterogeneous combustion to HCCI like combustion was also observed.

Diesel-ignited methane dual fuel combustion experiments were performed in a single cylinder research engine (SCRE). Methane was fumigated into the intake manifold and injection of diesel was used to initiate combustion. The engine was operated at a constant speed of 1500 rev/min, and diesel rail pressure was maintained at 500 bar. Diesel injection timing (SOI) was varied to quantify its impact on engine performance and engine-out ISNOx, ISHC, ISCO, and smoke emissions. The SOI sweeps were performed at different net indicated mean effective pressures (IMEPs) of 4.1, 6.5, 9.5, and 12.1 bar. Intake manifold pressure was maintained at 1.5 bar for the 4.1 and 6.5 bar IMEP SOI sweeps and 1.8 bar for the 9.5 and 12.1 bar IMEP SOI sweeps. Advancing SOI to 310º and earlier resulted in reduced ISNOx. However, high methane percent energy substitution (PES) resulted in high ISHC emissions especially at low IMEP.

Gold-based catalysts can be replaced with platinum group catalysts in catalytic automotive exhaust aftertreatment if their thermal stability and durability issues can be resolved. Hence, one of the potential markets for gold catalysis is the automotive after treatment market, our interest is to synthesize a gold-based catalyst which has practical applications in automotive industry specifically for diesel-methane dual fuel low-temperature combustion strategy where the exhaust temperature is varying from ~ 200 to400° C. Our research focused on synthesizing a bimetallic gold-copper catalyst which is not only highly active for CO oxidation reaction but also sinter-resistant at temperatures normally observed at LTC engine exhaust. The Au-Cu@SiO2 catalyst exhibited excellent efficacy for CO oxidation with >95% conversion to CO2 achieved at 300 °C. While the presence of Cu enhanced CO conversion at low to intermediate temperatures (50-300 °C), silica encapsulation of the Au-Cu nanocomposites facilitated for remarkable stability of the catalyst. Moreover, the catalyst exhibited remarkable stability at high reaction temperatures which could be attributed to the SiO2 encapsulation of nanoparticles. The activity and stability of Au-Cu@SiO2 catalyst are suitable for its application in automotive after treatment devices, especially in low-temperature combustion engine exhaust.