1 |
FEDERATED LEARNING AMIDST DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENTSBhargav Ganguly (19119859) 08 November 2024 (has links)
<p dir="ltr">Federated Learning (FL) is a prime example of a large-scale distributed machine learning framework that has emerged as a result of the exponential growth in data generation and processing capabilities on smart devices. This framework enables the efficient processing and analysis of vast amounts of data, leveraging the collective power of numerous devices to achieve unprecedented scalability and performance. In the FL framework, each end-user device trains a local model using its own data. Through the periodic synchronization of local models, FL achieves a global model that incorporates the insights from all participat- ing devices. This global model can then be used for various applications, such as predictive analytics, recommendation systems, and more.</p><p dir="ltr">Despite its potential, traditional Federated Learning (FL) frameworks face significant hur- dles in real-world applications. These challenges stem from two primary issues: the dynamic nature of data distributions and the efficient utilization of network resources in diverse set- tings. Traditional FL frameworks often rely on the assumption that data distributions remain stationary over time. However, real-world environments are inherently dynamic, with data distributions constantly evolving, which in turn becomes a potential source of <i>temporal</i> het- erogeneity in FL. Another significant challenge in traditional FL frameworks is the efficient use of network resources in heterogeneous settings. Real-world networks consist of devices with varying computational capabilities, communication protocols, and network conditions. Traditional FL frameworks often struggle to adapt to these diverse <i>spatially</i> heterogeneous settings, leading to inefficient use of network resources and increased latency.</p><p dir="ltr">The primary focus of this thesis is to investigate algorithmic frameworks that can miti- gate the challenges posed by <i>temporal</i> and <i>spatial</i> system heterogeneities in FL. One of the significant sources of <i>temporal</i> heterogeneities in FL is owed to the dynamic drifting of client datasets over time, whereas <i>spatial</i> heterogeneities majorly broadly subsume the diverse computational capabilities and network conditions of devices in a network. We introduce two novel FL frameworks: MASTER-FL, which addresses model staleness in the presence of <i>temporally</i> drifting datasets, and Cooperative Edge-Assisted Dynamic Federated Learning CE-FL, which manages both <i>spatial</i> and <i>temporal</i> heterogeneities in extensive hierarchical FL networks. MASTER-FL is specifically designed to ensure that the global model remains accurate and up-to-date even in environments which are characterized by rapidly changing datasets across time. CE-FL, on the other hand, leverages server-side computing capabili- ties, intelligent data offloading, floating aggregation and cooperative learning strategies to manage the diverse computational capabilities and network conditions often associated with modern FL systems.</p>
|
2 |
DISTRIBUTED MACHINE LEARNING OVER LARGE-SCALE NETWORKSFrank Lin (16553082) 18 July 2023 (has links)
<p>The swift emergence and wide-ranging utilization of machine learning (ML) across various industries, including healthcare, transportation, and robotics, have underscored the escalating need for efficient, scalable, and privacy-preserving solutions. Recognizing this, we present an integrated examination of three novel frameworks, each addressing different aspects of distributed learning and privacy issues: Two Timescale Hybrid Federated Learning (TT-HF), Delay-Aware Federated Learning (DFL), and Differential Privacy Hierarchical Federated Learning (DP-HFL). TT-HF introduces a semi-decentralized architecture that combines device-to-server and device-to-device (D2D) communications. Devices execute multiple stochastic gradient descent iterations on their datasets and sporadically synchronize model parameters via D2D communications. A unique adaptive control algorithm optimizes step size, D2D communication rounds, and global aggregation period to minimize network resource utilization and achieve a sublinear convergence rate. TT-HF outperforms conventional FL approaches in terms of model accuracy, energy consumption, and resilience against outages. DFL focuses on enhancing distributed ML training efficiency by accounting for communication delays between edge and cloud. It also uses multiple stochastic gradient descent iterations and periodically consolidates model parameters via edge servers. The adaptive control algorithm for DFL mitigates energy consumption and edge-to-cloud latency, resulting in faster global model convergence, reduced resource consumption, and robustness against delays. Lastly, DP-HFL is introduced to combat privacy vulnerabilities in FL. Merging the benefits of FL and Hierarchical Differential Privacy (HDP), DP-HFL significantly reduces the need for differential privacy noise while maintaining model performance, exhibiting an optimal privacy-performance trade-off. Theoretical analysis under both convex and nonconvex loss functions confirms DP-HFL’s effectiveness regarding convergence speed, privacy performance trade-off, and potential performance enhancement with appropriate network configuration. In sum, the study thoroughly explores TT-HF, DFL, and DP-HFL, and their unique solutions to distributed learning challenges such as efficiency, latency, and privacy concerns. These advanced FL frameworks have considerable potential to further enable effective, efficient, and secure distributed learning.</p>
|
Page generated in 0.1198 seconds