No description available.

This thesis focuses on how well indicators of judicial ideology and institutional constraints predict whether a judge will vote to increase abortion access. I develop a model that evaluates a judge's decision in an abortion case in light of ideological factors measured at the time of a judge's nomination to the bench and legal and institutional constraints at the time a judge decides a case. I analyze abortion cases from all of the U.S. Federal District Courts from 1973-2004. Unlike previous studies, which demonstrate that the president and the home state senators are the best predictors of judicial ideology, I find that the Senate Judiciary Committee at the time of the judge's nomination is the only statistically significant ideological indicator. Also, contrary to conventional wisdom, Supreme Court precedent (a legal constraint) is also a significant predictor of judicial voting behavior in abortion cases.

The thesis deals with the accounting and management of state organizational units. In order to meet the aim of work was selected entity District Court in Jindřichův Hradec. The theoretical part characterizes non-profit organizations, state organizational units, budget rules, accounting and management of state organizational units. The practical part deals with the characteristic of the selected entity, financial statements, accounting of specific cases and comparison with the accounting of business corporations. Furthermore, the practical part deals with the analyses of management with state property and state budget funds.