Spelling suggestions: "subject:"dormitory""
51 |
Hall living of HKU students /Sit, Chi-wai. January 1998 (has links)
Thesis (M. Arch.)--University of Hong Kong, 1998. / Includes special report study entitled: Hall life of HKU students. Includes bibliographical references.
|
52 |
Student perceptions of community on co-educational and single-sex floors in the residence halls at the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse /Harrington, Meegan M. January 2002 (has links)
Thesis (M.S. Ed.)--University of Wisconsin -- La Crosse, 2002. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 41-43).
|
53 |
Residential hall as a living: learning communityWong, Yan-pan., 黃寅斌. January 2000 (has links)
published_or_final_version / Architecture / Master / Master of Architecture
|
54 |
A mental health epidemiological survey relating dormitory factors to emotional adjustmentNessman, Donald George January 1976 (has links)
No description available.
|
55 |
Student perceptions of living conditions in University of Arizona women's residence hallsBallou, Cynthia Lee, 1942- January 1967 (has links)
No description available.
|
56 |
Residence hall discipline and academic performanceVolbrecht, Adam A. January 2006 (has links)
The purpose of this study was to examine the grades and demographic characteristics of students involved with the residence hall disciplinary process during the 2005 fall semester at Ball State University. These characteristics were studied to determine if differences existed in the academic performance and demographic characteristics of disciplinary students and the general residence hall population. Differences between the disciplinary sample and residence hall population were found to exist. Freshmen and sophomores in the disciplinary sample achieved lower mean grade point averages. Freshmen and males were over-represented in the disciplinary sample. / Department of Educational Studies
|
57 |
Comparing health promoting lifestyle behaviors between wellness and traditional residence hall studentsMalinski, David F. January 1991 (has links)
The purpose of this study was to identify college students' health-promoting lifestyle behaviors and to identify differences in these behaviors among various groups of university students living in different residence halls. The subjects who participated in this study were students randomly selected from six wellness residence halls and six traditional residence halls. Of the 200 subjects randomly selected from the two groups, 121 (61%) students completed both the pre and posttest Health Promoting Lifestyle Profiles (HPLP). The wellness and traditional residence hall subjects' pre and posttests were not significantly different from each other. As a result of living in residence halls, the subjects' from both wellness and traditional halls scores on the HPLP increased significantly from pre to posttest. Univariate analyses of variance on the separate dependent variables found significant differences between residence halls for health responsibility. Also, as a result of living in residence halls, the subjects (both wellness and traditional hall) health responsibility scores significantly improved from pre to posttest. An analysis of variance was also used to analyze the effects that the demographic variables had on both the wellness and the traditional residence halls' pretest, posttest, and changes within each sample. / Institute for Wellness
|
58 |
Issues for non-traditional undergraduate students living in traditional college and university residence halls : a modified Delphi study / Non-traditional undergraduate students living in traditional college and university residence hallsHerr, Susan K. January 1991 (has links)
This study identified issues, problems, barriers and opportunities which impact the residential experience for non-traditional undergraduate students living in traditional college and university residence halls. Non-traditional students were defined as students twenty-five years of age or older. The study utilized two distinct research methods; a demographic survey of chief housing officers and the modified Delphi study of non-traditional students' impressions and issues to be considered as barriers and enablers in their residence hall experience.Chief housing officers from 101 institutions within a four state area in the Midwest reported 7180 non-traditional students currently living in traditional residence halls. Most chief housing officers were aware of these students on campus, but many of the officers wrote that because this was a negligible number of students, little had been done especially to accommodate this group.Chief housing officers identified the following top five needs of non-traditional students: 1) quiet and privacy, 2) contractual arrangements, 3) issues related to living and relating to others, 4 family issues, and 5) special programming. Four of the top five needs were analyzed by the researcher as institutional barriers according to Cross' Chain of Response (COR) Model; other barriers identified included dispositional barriers and situational barriers.The chief housing officers most frequently reported the following plans to meet the needs of non-traditional students~ 1) to alter contractual arrangements, 2) to renovate facilities, 3) to group students together, and 4) to develop special services or policies.The 30 non-traditional students who participated in the modified Delphi study identified barriers as unique needs or issues that adversely affected their participation or satisfaction with overall residence hall experiences. The top five barriers they identified were: 1) difficulties due to maturity differences, 2) too much noise, 3) not having housing over breaks, 4) lack of same age companionship, and 5) policies that were too restrictive for adult life styles. Three of the top five barriers were analyzed by the researcher as institutional barriers; others were analyzed as situational or dispositional barriers.The non-traditional students identified enablers as circumstances that positively affected their participation or satisfaction with overall residence hall experiences. The top five enablers identified were: 1) accessibility to campus facilities and resources, 2) convenience, 3) enhanced academic focus while living on campus, 4) greater involvement in the institution, and 5) increased faculty contact and affordability (tied). Cross' COR Model likewise was applied, unconventionally, by the researcher to the enabling issues. Five of the six predominant enablers were analyzed as institutional enablers; others were analyzed as dispositional enablers.Suggested solutions to these barriers were offered by non-traditional students. Students either asked to be housed separately or treated differently from traditional age students, to have policies enforced consistently and more frequently, or to have programs and mechanisms in place to bring about greater interaction and ultimate appreciation of the differences between non-traditional and traditional students. / Department of Educational Leadership
|
59 |
Moral decision making of university housing and residence life professionalsMoeder, Brenda S., January 2007 (has links)
Thesis (Ed. D.)--University of Missouri-Columbia, 2007. / The entire dissertation/thesis text is included in the research.pdf file; the official abstract appears in the short.pdf file (which also appears in the research.pdf); a non-technical general description, or public abstract, appears in the public.pdf file. Title from title screen of research.pdf file (viewed on February 26, 2008) Vita. Includes bibliographical references.
|
60 |
Perkins Green III : proposed married and graduate student housing /Lin, Chou-Tein. January 1993 (has links)
Thesis (M.F.A.)--Rochester Institute of Technology, 1993. / Typescript. Includes bibliographical references (leaf [63]).
|
Page generated in 0.3497 seconds