Master of Science in Medicine / Rationale: Asthma management aims to achieve optimal control on the minimal effective dose of medication. We assessed the effectiveness of two algorithms to guide ICS dose in well-controlled patients on ICS+LABA in a double-blind study, comparing dose adjustment guided by exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) to clinical care algorithm(CCA) based on symptoms and lung function. Methods: We randomised non-smoking adult asthmatics on minimum FP dose 100μgs daily +LABA to ICS adjustment using eNO or CCA, assessed over 5 visits during 8 months treatment. Primary endpoints were asthma-free days and asthma related quality of life (QOL). Analysis was by mixed model regression and generalised estimating equations with log link. Results: 69 subjects were randomised (eNO:34, CCA:35) and 58 completed the study. At baseline mean FEV1 was 94% pred., mean eNO (200ml/sec) 7.1 ppb, median ACQ6 score 0.33. Median ICS dose was 500 μg (IQR 100-500) at baseline and 100 μg on both eNO (IQR 100-200) and CCA arms (IQR 100–100) at end of study. There were no significant differences between eNO and CCA groups in asthma-free days (RR=0.92, 95% CI 0.8–1.01), AQL (RRAQL<median = 0.95, 95% CI 0.8–1.1) or exacerbation-free days (HR = 1.03, 95%CI 0.6–1.7). Neither clinic FEV1 (overall mean difference FEV1 % pred. -0.24%, 95% CI -2.2–1.7) nor a.m. PEF (mean difference 1.94 L/min (95% CI -2.9–6.8) were significantly different. Similar proportions of subjects were treated for ≥1 exacerbation (eNO: 50%, 95% CI 32.1–67.9; CCA: 60%, 95% CI 43.9–76.2). Conclusion: Substantial reductions in ICS doses were achieved in well controlled asthmatics on ICS+LABA, with no significant differences in outcomes between eNO or clinically based algorithms.

The aim of this work is to evaluate the fuzzy system for different types of patients for levodopa infusion in Parkinson Disease based on simulation experiments using the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model. Fuzzy system is to control patient’s condition by adjusting the value of flow rate, and it must be effective on three types of patients, there are three different types of patients, including sensitive, typical and tolerant patient; the sensitive patients are very sensitive to drug dosage, but the tolerant patients are resistant to drug dose, so it is important for controller to deal with dose increment and decrement to adapt different types of patients, such as sensitive and tolerant patients. Using the fuzzy system, three different types of patients can get useful control for simulating medication treatment, and controller will get good effect for patients, when the initial flow rate of infusion is in the small range of the approximate optimal value for the current patient’ type.

Master of Science in Medicine / Rationale: Asthma management aims to achieve optimal control on the minimal effective dose of medication. We assessed the effectiveness of two algorithms to guide ICS dose in well-controlled patients on ICS+LABA in a double-blind study, comparing dose adjustment guided by exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) to clinical care algorithm(CCA) based on symptoms and lung function. Methods: We randomised non-smoking adult asthmatics on minimum FP dose 100μgs daily +LABA to ICS adjustment using eNO or CCA, assessed over 5 visits during 8 months treatment. Primary endpoints were asthma-free days and asthma related quality of life (QOL). Analysis was by mixed model regression and generalised estimating equations with log link. Results: 69 subjects were randomised (eNO:34, CCA:35) and 58 completed the study. At baseline mean FEV1 was 94% pred., mean eNO (200ml/sec) 7.1 ppb, median ACQ6 score 0.33. Median ICS dose was 500 μg (IQR 100-500) at baseline and 100 μg on both eNO (IQR 100-200) and CCA arms (IQR 100–100) at end of study. There were no significant differences between eNO and CCA groups in asthma-free days (RR=0.92, 95% CI 0.8–1.01), AQL (RRAQL<median = 0.95, 95% CI 0.8–1.1) or exacerbation-free days (HR = 1.03, 95%CI 0.6–1.7). Neither clinic FEV1 (overall mean difference FEV1 % pred. -0.24%, 95% CI -2.2–1.7) nor a.m. PEF (mean difference 1.94 L/min (95% CI -2.9–6.8) were significantly different. Similar proportions of subjects were treated for ≥1 exacerbation (eNO: 50%, 95% CI 32.1–67.9; CCA: 60%, 95% CI 43.9–76.2). Conclusion: Substantial reductions in ICS doses were achieved in well controlled asthmatics on ICS+LABA, with no significant differences in outcomes between eNO or clinically based algorithms.