Having been the target country of the international non-governmental organization for the past decades, Taiwan has survived and strived to be the giver in the international community. During the process, education has played an important role. The study used comparative method proposed by Bereday in addition to a qualitative data analysis software, NUD*IST. Three major purposes were identified as follows: (1) Discuss the conception and importance of international education aid. (2) Compare the experience of international education aid of Tzu Chi Foundation and World Vision Taiwan. (3) Give suggestions for other organizations to promote international education aid. Finally, the researcher concluded that the idea of international aid had developed from economic aid toward social development project with an emphasis on the sustainable development. In addition, there existed several common features between the Tzu Chi Foundation and World Vision Taiwan and terms of general conception and model of education aids. Even though, the Tzu Chi Foundation more on the logistic equipment of educational practices, whereas the World Vision Taiwan proclaimed the human right for children as their focus of aid.

As democracy promotion has become an increasingly important aspect on the agenda of foreign aid donors, and since such prioritization of funding comes at the expense of other development areas, it is arguably of interest for donors as well as researchers to investigate its actual impact on democratization. This study endeavors to examine the influence of two types of foreign assistance that could potentially contribute to a democratic development, directlythrough democracy support and indirectly through aid focused on education. Four models of regression analysis are applied on a data set of 65 developing countries receiving Official Development Assistance (ODA), during the period of 2006–2018. The findings of this study are inconclusive in determining the influence of these aid types, as the main results show no significant effects on the Freedom House grading of the recipient countries. Yet, when using an alternative measurement, the Democracy Index, directly focused democracy support appears to have a slight positive and significant impact on democratization. These results should however be interpreted with caution due to the risk of reversed causality.