This study critically explores the pervasive issue of corruption in humanitarian assistance, focusing on the Liberia Red Cross Society (LRCS) during the Ebola outbreak in Liberia from 2014-2016. For a country grappling with broken infrastructure and fragile healthcare systems due to a 14-year-long civil war, the Ebola crisis in Liberia was an unprecedented disaster as evidenced by 10,672 recorded cases and 4,808 reported fatalities between 2014 and 2016. The LRCS was a prominent local humanitarian actor in the Ebola response and recovery efforts, but its work was marred by corruption stemming from organizational, contextual, and motivational factors. This study sheds light on the nature and extent of corruption within humanitarian action from the perspective of the LRCS and the Ebola epidemic in Liberia, contributing to humanitarianism as a discipline and a profession. The study utilized the principal-agent theory and the organizational culture theory of corruption in humanitarian assistance, which had been employed in earlier studies of a similar nature. In terms of methodology, a qualitative approach with retrospective review was employed to address two research questions regarding the drivers and impact of corruption in the Ebola response and recovery operations conducted by the LRCS. Data for the study were collected from a mix of 14 pre-existing sources, including documents originating from the LRCS and its consortium of donors and partners, as well as published news content from notable local and global media outlets. The results were generated through document analysis facilitated by ATLAS.ti, a qualitative data analysis software, which considered patterns, trends, and insights within the sources gathered for the study. Multiple rounds of analyses on the data were conducted to validate the results of the study.  The findings of this study reveal a complex web of corruption within humanitarian aid delivery during crisis and disaster. Corrupt practices within the LRCS included fraud and misuse of Ebola relief funds and resources, driven by individual motivations coupled with a number of organizational and contextual factors. The corruption had adverse effects on the efficiency, effectiveness, and accountability of relief efforts, potentially leading to reduced donor confidence in the LRCS and funding reduction. The study also stresses the importance of leadership, decision-making processes as well as resource management in preventing or enabling corruption within humanitarian aid organizations. These findings underscore the need for robust internal oversight, accountability mechanisms, and ethical leadership in humanitarian organizations to prevent and address corruption effectively.