1 |
Validation of the Magneto-articulography for the Assessment of Speech Kinematics (MASK) System and Testing for Use in a Clinical Research SettingLau, Calvin 03 December 2013 (has links)
A novel technology, the Magneto-articulography for the Assessment of Speech Kinematics (MASK) system, which measures brain activity and oromotor movement simultaneously, was validated for its speech tracking capabilities. MASK has not been systematically tested, so its movement tracking accuracy and practicality for research was still unknown.
An error testing and mapping protocol is developed to validate MASK accuracy against established electromagnetic articulography (EMA) speech tracking systems. Data from human speech experiments are also compared.
MASK exhibited higher positional error and fluctuation than EMA, and more inconsistent distribution of errors. Error mapping and potential error correction protocols were also developed. MASK spatial and temporal resolutions were found insufficient for precise tracking of small and quick articulatory movements.
MASK requires much improvement to reach the capabilities of EMA. Further investigation into numerical instabilities of the position calculation algorithms is encouraged. This project provides the first assessment of MASK, which may advance speech research for future applications.
|
2 |
Validation of the Magneto-articulography for the Assessment of Speech Kinematics (MASK) System and Testing for Use in a Clinical Research SettingLau, Calvin 03 December 2013 (has links)
A novel technology, the Magneto-articulography for the Assessment of Speech Kinematics (MASK) system, which measures brain activity and oromotor movement simultaneously, was validated for its speech tracking capabilities. MASK has not been systematically tested, so its movement tracking accuracy and practicality for research was still unknown.
An error testing and mapping protocol is developed to validate MASK accuracy against established electromagnetic articulography (EMA) speech tracking systems. Data from human speech experiments are also compared.
MASK exhibited higher positional error and fluctuation than EMA, and more inconsistent distribution of errors. Error mapping and potential error correction protocols were also developed. MASK spatial and temporal resolutions were found insufficient for precise tracking of small and quick articulatory movements.
MASK requires much improvement to reach the capabilities of EMA. Further investigation into numerical instabilities of the position calculation algorithms is encouraged. This project provides the first assessment of MASK, which may advance speech research for future applications.
|
Page generated in 0.0738 seconds