Spelling suggestions: "subject:"extensionality"" "subject:"intentionality""
1 |
kâ-yôskâtahk ôma nêhiyawêwin : the representation of intentionality in Plains CreeMühlbauer, Jeffrey Thomas 11 1900 (has links)
This thesis considers the reference system of Plains Cree, an Algonquian language spoken in Canada. I argue that the referential system of this language can be understood as coding distinctions in extentionality; it distinguishes between referents that possess perspectives (‘intentional’) and referents that do not (‘extentional’). With respect to perspectival possession, Plains Cree distinguishes four referential classes: (i) inherently extentional “Inanimate” referents, (ii) contextually extentional “Obviative” referents, (iii) contextually
intentional “Proximate” referents, and (iv) unspecified “Animate” referents. I then show
that the referential class “Obviative” is decompositional; it is constructed out of
components that code referential dependency, which is the confluence of structural
ordering and perspectival embedding. Finally, I consider the methodological issues raised by the study of referential types, showing how different data-collection methods interact with the semantics of perspectival possession.
|
2 |
kâ-yôskâtahk ôma nêhiyawêwin : the representation of intentionality in Plains CreeMühlbauer, Jeffrey Thomas 11 1900 (has links)
This thesis considers the reference system of Plains Cree, an Algonquian language spoken in Canada. I argue that the referential system of this language can be understood as coding distinctions in extentionality; it distinguishes between referents that possess perspectives (‘intentional’) and referents that do not (‘extentional’). With respect to perspectival possession, Plains Cree distinguishes four referential classes: (i) inherently extentional “Inanimate” referents, (ii) contextually extentional “Obviative” referents, (iii) contextually
intentional “Proximate” referents, and (iv) unspecified “Animate” referents. I then show
that the referential class “Obviative” is decompositional; it is constructed out of
components that code referential dependency, which is the confluence of structural
ordering and perspectival embedding. Finally, I consider the methodological issues raised by the study of referential types, showing how different data-collection methods interact with the semantics of perspectival possession.
|
3 |
kâ-yôskâtahk ôma nêhiyawêwin : the representation of intentionality in Plains CreeMühlbauer, Jeffrey Thomas 11 1900 (has links)
This thesis considers the reference system of Plains Cree, an Algonquian language spoken in Canada. I argue that the referential system of this language can be understood as coding distinctions in extentionality; it distinguishes between referents that possess perspectives (‘intentional’) and referents that do not (‘extentional’). With respect to perspectival possession, Plains Cree distinguishes four referential classes: (i) inherently extentional “Inanimate” referents, (ii) contextually extentional “Obviative” referents, (iii) contextually
intentional “Proximate” referents, and (iv) unspecified “Animate” referents. I then show
that the referential class “Obviative” is decompositional; it is constructed out of
components that code referential dependency, which is the confluence of structural
ordering and perspectival embedding. Finally, I consider the methodological issues raised by the study of referential types, showing how different data-collection methods interact with the semantics of perspectival possession. / Arts, Faculty of / Linguistics, Department of / Graduate
|
Page generated in 0.1035 seconds