Submitted by José Geraldo Bertini Junior (geraldo.bertini@unesp.br) on 2018-07-16T18:26:26Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Versão final 11.04 LAURA JARDIM.doc: 453120 bytes, checksum: 93fc76e8824a7a52fda13333f7f9f6df (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Jacqueline de Almeida null (jacquie@franca.unesp.br) on 2018-07-18T11:48:56Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 BertiniJunior_JG_me_fran.pdf: 897895 bytes, checksum: 63e479f07e4538088959d19902d84b47 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-07-18T11:48:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 BertiniJunior_JG_me_fran.pdf: 897895 bytes, checksum: 63e479f07e4538088959d19902d84b47 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-05-09 / O presente trabalho tem o objetivo de demonstrar a importância das funções das Serventias Extrajudiciais na concretização do princípio da dignidade da pessoa humana e na sua contribuição à desjudicialização. Ditos Cartórios, como também são conhecidos, por meio de seus oficiais delegados, passaram a ter suas atribuições ampliadas, máxime após a Constituição Federal de 1988. Com o advento da Reforma do Poder Judiciário promovida pela Emenda Constitucional n. 45, de 30 de dezembro de 2004, foi reforçada a onda de desjudicialização, ou seja, buscou-se instrumentais de materialização dos direitos básicos do cidadão sem a necessidade inexorável de se bater às portas do já assoberbado Poder Judiciário. Neste cenário, as Serventias Extrajudiciais representaram, e representam cada vez mais, um importante aliado na tomada de medidas desjudicializadoras capazes de assegurar direitos básicos dos cidadãos de forma célere e menos onerosa. A metodologia utilizada no presente trabalho foi a bibliográfica e jurisprudencial dedutivas. Com efeito, pudemos concluir que as principais atividades tabelioas e registrais praticadas pelo Registro Civil das Pessoas Naturais, pelo Tabelião de Notas e pelo Tabelião de Protestos foram capazes de contribuir sobremaneira na desjudicialização e no desafogo do Poder Judiciário, representando um reforço ao princípio da dignidade da pessoa humana / The present research aims to demonstrate the importance of Extrajudicial Measures in materializing the principle of human person dignity and its contribution to de-judicialization. Said Notary’s office’s, as they are also known, through its officials, were given amplified atributions, specially after the Federal Constitution of 1988. With the rise of Judiciary Power Reform in the Constitucional Amendment n. 45, of december 30th, 2004, the wave of de-judicialization was reinforced, that is to say, instruments of materializing basic human rights without necessity of judicialization were created. In this scenario, the Extrajudicial Measures represented, and still represent more and more an important ally in the persuit of juridic means to secure basic human rights in a fast and less expensive way. The method used in this research is deductive, bibliographic and jurisprudencial. We can stablish that most of Notary’s Office’s activity are capable of contributing significantly in de-judicializing and therefore decreasing Judiciary Power’s overload of work, which means an inforcement to the principle of the human person dignity.

Le 1er avril 2003, l’entrée en vigueur de la Loi sur le système de justice pénale pour les adolescents (LSJPA) a fourni aux policiers canadiens de nouveaux outils pour procéder à des interventions non-judiciaires auprès d’adolescents contrevenants. Dorénavant, les policiers détiennent le pouvoir officiel d’imposer des mesures extrajudiciaires aux adolescents interpellés pour avoir commis des infractions plutôt que de procéder à leur arrestation formelle. La présente étude vise à déterminer quelles caractéristiques des adolescents et circonstances des infractions ont un impact significatif sur les décisions des policiers d’imposer ces mesures plutôt que de procéder à des arrestations. Les résultats sont basés sur trois échantillons de participations criminelles juvéniles enregistrées par un corps policier canadien entre 2003 et 2010: le premier composé d’infractions contre la personne (n= 3 482), le second, d’infractions contre la propriété (n= 8 230) et le troisième, d’autres crimes (n= 1 974). L’analyse de régression logistique multiniveaux a été utilisée pour déterminer les facteurs — tels que le sexe, l’âge et les contacts antérieurs avec la justice des adolescents ainsi que la localisation dans le temps et l’espace de l’infraction — ont un impact significatif sur le pouvoir discrétionnaire des policiers. Certains facteurs ont une influence universelle d’une catégorie de crime à l’autre, tandis que d’autres ont un impact spécifique selon le type d’infraction commise. / Since April 3rd 2003, the Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) provides police officers with new tools to divert canadian juvenile offenders. Specifically, police officers can officially impose extrajudicial measures to juvenile delinquents instead of handing them directly to the justice system. The current study seeks to determine which characteristics of the offenders and circumstances of the offences significantly impact the decisions of officers to divert cases instead of sending them to the formal justice system. The results are based on three samples of juvenile offence participations recorded by a Canadian police force between 2003 and 2010: the first composed of violent offences (n= 3,482), the second, of proprety offences (n= 8,230) and the third, of other offences (n= 1,974). Multilevel logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine which factors - for example, gender, age, and criminal record of the offender as well as location in time and space of the offence - have a significant impact on police decision-making for each category of offence. Although some factors have similar significant impacts regardless of offence type, others have a differential influence depending on the type of crime that was committed.