I investigated the effect of turbidity on the foraging behaviour of juvenile Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in the laboratory. Specifically, I examined a behavioural "tradeoff" between visual ability and "perceived" risk. I assessed visual ability by measuring the reaction distance of juvenile Chinook to planktonic Artemia prey. I found Chinook exhibited a log-linear decline in reaction distance with increasing turbidity. To determine the effects of turbidity and microhabitat on foraging rate, I conducted separate experiments for surface (Drosophila), planktonic (Artemia), and benthic (Tubifex) prey across a range of turbidity levels (0, 25, 50, 100, 200, 400, 800 mg•L⁻¹). Foraging rates were reduced at higher turbidity conditions for all three prey. However, for surface and benthic prey, foraging rates were also low in clear water; highest rates were attained at intermediate turbidity levels (50-200 mg•L⁻¹). The degree to which intermediate turbidities were associated with higher foraging rates was size-dependent. Smaller individuals (150-57 mm FL) exhibited relatively higher foraging rates in clear conditions than did larger individuals. However, planktonic foraging rates by juveniles were consistently high in clear water, regardless of fish size. In experiments manipulating light level independent of turbidity, I allowed salmon to forage under conditions which were either turbid, or clear but with light intensity correspondingly reduced. Foraging rates were similar between the two treatments for planktonic prey, but differed for benthic and surface prey. Generally, foraging rates exhibited by juvenile Chinook salmon could not be explained on the basis of visual ability alone. I suggest that young salmon also exhibited foraging behaviour consistent with their perception of risk to predation. In arena experiments, juvenile Chinook distributed themselves randomly in turbid conditions; in clear conditions they associated with the bottom. When bird and fish predator models were introduced the fish altered their spatial distribution, occupying deeper regions regardless of turbidity. However, their response in turbid conditions was less marked and lasted for a shorter time. Turbidity apparently mitigated the perceived risk of predation in juvenile Chinook. I developed a conceptual tradeoff model that predicted the general effect of turbidity on foraging behaviour. Assuming differences in either prey quality or perceived risk of predation in three microhabitats (surface, water column, bottom), the model resolved the apparent dissimilarities between planktonic and other foraging behaviours. Perceived risk of Chinook to predation was significantly different between surface and water column microhabitats. When exposed to a non-visual "fixed-risk" stimulus (sound), salmon apparently perceived less risk as turbidity increased. I conclude that in turbid waters juvenile salmon exhibit foraging behaviour in a manner consistent with a tradeoff between their visual ability and perceived risk. / Science, Faculty of / Zoology, Department of / Graduate

Juvenile rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri Richardson) from the Lardeau River in southeastern British Columbia were studied in both their natural environment and stream tanks. In the river, highest densities of recently emerged trout occurred in areas with overhanging cover, shallow depth and minimal current. Older, underyearling trout were generally found in regions with smaller bottom particle size than yearlings; both age classes avoided fast current areas. Young trout migrated from the Lardeau River to Kootenay Lake during spring and summer. Except during these seasons trout were larger and more abundant in the upper versus the lower river; this was probably a result of better rearing habitat and higher biological productivity in the upper river. Trout fed almost exclusively on drifting organisms. Lake origin drift was an important food to riverine trout during summer; kokanee (Oncorhynchus nerka) eggs and fry were significant during fall and spring respectively. In stream tanks, where it was possible to manipulate prey populations, live prey were consumed significantly more than the same species when dead, suggesting that prey body movement was an important prey characteristic. In both the field and stream tanks, trout consumed prey within a discrete size range with larger fry generally consuming bigger prey than smaller fry. Further work is suggested which would improve our understanding of the feeding ecology of stream rearing trout. / Science, Faculty of / Zoology, Department of / Graduate

No description available.

Two experiments were conducted to determine the effect of dietary self-selection of protein and energy on the reproductive performance of Large White turkey hens. The first study examined the effect of self-selection on reproductive performance during a production cycle that started in July and ended in December. Hens were maintained on one of two dietary regimes for a 20-week production cycle. Control birds were fed a conventional diet (18% crude protein, 2700 kcal/kg) which contained nutrients at levels recommended by the National Research Council (NRC, 1984). The remaining hens were allowed to select their diet from two feed sources: one relatively high in protein and low in energy (35% crude protein, 1850 kcal/kg) and the other relatively low in protein and high in energy (8% crude protein, 3220 kcal/kg). Hens fed the split diet produced an equal number of eggs as control hens but consumed significantly less feed (p≤.05). The diet that was selected contained approximately 40% less protein than the control diet (p≤.001) which resulted in significantly increased efficiency of protein utilization (eggs/kg protein) for hens fed the split-diet (p≤.001). In addition, the incidence of broodiness was significantly reduced in the split-diet treatment (p≤.10). Egg weight, fertility, hatchability and hatch of fertile eggs were not significantly effected by the dietary regimes. There was significantly greater body weight loss in hens fed the split-diet (p≤.05). Increasing trends in feed, energy, and protein consumptions were noted over the course of production. For this reason a second experiment was conducted to determine if these trends were the result of seasonal affects, due to changing ambient temperatures, or the result of changes in nutrient requirements of the turkey hen occurring with different stages of production. The second experiment was similar to Experiment 1 except that the production period started in March and ended in July. As in the first experiment, egg production was equal for hens in the two treatment groups. Feed intake and energy intake were not significantly different for hens fed the split and complete diets. However, as in the previous experiment, protein intake was significantly reduced in the split-diet treatment (p≤.001). The incidence of broodiness was again attenuated among split-fed birds (p≤.10). Average daily feed and energy intake appeared to decrease over the course of production which was presumed to be related to increasing ambient temperatures. As in the previous experiment, protein intake increased over the course of production despite increasing environmental temperatures. Therefore, the increased protein selection noted in these two experiments does not seem to be related to hot weather and may indicate an increased protein requirement in the later stages of egg production. Based on the finding that the incidence of broodiness was reduced among hens fed the split-diet, blood sera from hens in both experiments were analyzed for luteinizing hormone (LH) and prolactin (PRL). Although the incidence of broodiness was significantly reduced among birds fed the split-diet, there was no significant difference in serum LH and PRL concentrations. Therefore, the reduction in the incidence of broodiness that was noted in these experiments was not correlated with changes in the blood concentration of these hormones. / Master of Science

LD2668 .T4 1940 W52 / Master of Science

Call number: LD2668 .T4 1953 S9 / Master of Science

Call number: LD2668 .T4 1962 D38

Call number: LD2668 .T4 1962 Y68

Call number: LD2668 .T4 1964 A22 / Master of Science

Call number: LD2668 .T4 1965 M943 / Master of Science