Prior research suggests that the use of accounting information differs substantially by investor class. My analysis extends this line of research to the area of SEC Form 8-K filings. Prior research also provides mixed evidence on the informativeness of these filings. I hypothesize that the method of the disclosure is an important factor in evaluating 8-K usefulness to varying types of investors. Specifically, the timing, venue, and packaging of these accounting disclosures affect their use by investors. Regulation Fair Disclosure (2000) considers both press releases and 8-K filings as broad-based disclosures that do not favor any investor class. I, however, identify five unique informational settings in which 8-K filings occur. The five settings are: a concurrent 8-K event and filing (with or without a press release), a filing which precedes the press release, a press release that precedes the filing, an 8-K event that precedes a filing and/or press release, and the 8-K event alone. I examine the similarities and differences in trading by small and large investors across these settings. The identification of these empirical regularities with respect to disclosure form should be particularly useful to policy makers seeking to implement level playing field objectives with respect to public disclosures. My findings show that the relative trading activity to 8-K filings is different by the type of disclosure. Differential trading activity was found to be more pronounced in disclosure settings that contained a public announcement. In addition, the type of Form 8-K disclosure also had an effect on the differential trading activity. Form 8-K filings of acquisition or disposition of assets were associated with the most pronounced responses. My findings show the differential trading activity to these filings differs from other accounting events such as earnings announcements and annual report filings.

Prior research suggests that the use of accounting information differs substantially by investor class. My analysis extends this line of research to the area of SEC Form 8-K filings. Prior research also provides mixed evidence on the informativeness of these filings. I hypothesize that the method of the disclosure is an important factor in evaluating 8-K usefulness to varying types of investors. Specifically, the timing, venue, and packaging of these accounting disclosures affect their use by investors. Regulation Fair Disclosure (2000) considers both press releases and 8-K filings as broad-based disclosures that do not favor any investor class. I, however, identify five unique informational settings in which 8-K filings occur. The five settings are: a concurrent 8-K event and filing (with or without a press release), a filing which precedes the press release, a press release that precedes the filing, an 8-K event that precedes a filing and/or press release, and the 8-K event alone. I examine the similarities and differences in trading by small and large investors across these settings. The identification of these empirical regularities with respect to disclosure form should be particularly useful to policy makers seeking to implement level playing field objectives with respect to public disclosures. My findings show that the relative trading activity to 8-K filings is different by the type of disclosure. Differential trading activity was found to be more pronounced in disclosure settings that contained a public announcement. In addition, the type of Form 8-K disclosure also had an effect on the differential trading activity. Form 8-K filings of acquisition or disposition of assets were associated with the most pronounced responses. My findings show the differential trading activity to these filings differs from other accounting events such as earnings announcements and annual report filings.

Capital markets are effective allocators of resources and are thus vital to a society’s economic growth. Capital markets in the European Union and the United States are widely regarded as efficient. This means that whenever information about an issuer is made public, the price of the securities associated with the issuer adjusts to reflect this new information. Market efficiency is a core tenet in securities markets regulation that justifies mandatory disclosure regimes.  In the European Union, issuers are prompted to disclose inside information as soon as it arises. However, whether inside information is at hand is in some sense a subjective assessment, which is why the European disclosure model is regarded as continuous – issuers at all times have to determine whether inside information is at hand. Meanwhile, the American system requires disclosure to be made on an ad hoc basis – the duty to disclose information arises when predetermined events materialise. As opposed to quarterly or yearly reports, these events are non-periodic. The respective disclosure philosophies have implications for issuer costs as well as investors in terms of market efficiency.  Given that both the European and American capital markets function well, at least prima facie, what are the practical advantages and disadvantages of the respective philosophies? This thesis lays out the legal pretext for both perspectives, the current regulations in place, and then compares them. The aim is to understand what the two legal systems have in common, what they do differently, and subsequently to analyse what this means in a bigger context, compared with the stated aims of the respective legislations.