1 |
Microstructure-property relationships of SiC fibre-reinforced borosilicate glassShin, Dong-Woo January 1993 (has links)
No description available.
|
2 |
The development of impact toughness and resistance to slow crack growth in modified polyvinyl chloride and polyethylene pipe grade polymersIngham, Edward John January 2003 (has links)
No description available.
|
3 |
A study of coarse grain heat affected zone of accelerated cooled structural steelsAraujo, C. L. D. January 1990 (has links)
No description available.
|
4 |
The influence of elemental segregation on cleavage initiation in ferritic steelsFranklin, Rachel E. January 1990 (has links)
No description available.
|
5 |
Microstructure and continuous cooling transformation of C-Mn-Ni and C-Mn-Ni-Mo weld metalsZhang, Zhuyao January 1994 (has links)
No description available.
|
6 |
Fracture characteristics of coarse grained ceramicsBrowne, David J. January 1989 (has links)
No description available.
|
7 |
The toughness of high strength aluminium alloysCai, Huasu January 1991 (has links)
No description available.
|
8 |
The effects of metastable zirconia on the properties of ordinary Portland cementChyad, Fadhil Attiya January 1989 (has links)
No description available.
|
9 |
Fracture Toughness: Evaluation of Analysis Procedures to Simplify JIC CalculationsBattiste, Thomas Joseph 01 May 2010 (has links)
The purpose of this study is to determine if there is an alternative analysis method that can provide an estimate of fracture toughness for specimens that failed to meet all of ASTM E 1820 requirements. This study will look at three alternative analysis methods and evaluate each method’s ability to accurately and easily estimate the elastic-plastic fracture toughness. The standard method of analysis is long and complicated which leads to a number of validity requirements that many tests fail to meet. The objective is to find an easier and reasonably accurate estimate of elastic-plastic fracture toughness.
This study has shown that there are two useful means of directly measuring the toughness from the load versus displacement record. It has also shown that there is a method of substituting a linear regression for the power law regression which yields good estimates of fracture toughness. All three methods have been estimating JQ which is a provisional measure of elastic-plastic fracture toughness. The first direct method uses an integral of the area up to the maximum load point to acquire the JQ. The second direct method uses a conversion of the linear elastic fracture toughness which only uses the crack growth and the maximum load from the load versus displacement record. The final method substitutes a linear regression of the two J-R points on either side of the JQ line to determine the JQ point.
Each alternative analysis was able to acquire J values with varying degrees of accuracy. The linear substitution was the most accurate. The first direct method using an area integral tended to over predict the true J value. The second direct method using a conversion formula had a tendency to under predict the true J value. None of these methods could substitute for the ASTM standard; however, each provided a usable estimate of elastic-plastic fracture toughness.
|
10 |
Fracture Toughness: Evaluation of Analysis Procedures to Simplify JIC CalculationsBattiste, Thomas Joseph 01 May 2010 (has links)
The purpose of this study is to determine if there is an alternative analysis method that can provide an estimate of fracture toughness for specimens that failed to meet all of ASTM E 1820 requirements. This study will look at three alternative analysis methods and evaluate each method’s ability to accurately and easily estimate the elastic-plastic fracture toughness. The standard method of analysis is long and complicated which leads to a number of validity requirements that many tests fail to meet. The objective is to find an easier and reasonably accurate estimate of elastic-plastic fracture toughness. This study has shown that there are two useful means of directly measuring the toughness from the load versus displacement record. It has also shown that there is a method of substituting a linear regression for the power law regression which yields good estimates of fracture toughness. All three methods have been estimating JQ which is a provisional measure of elastic-plastic fracture toughness. The first direct method uses an integral of the area up to the maximum load point to acquire the JQ. The second direct method uses a conversion of the linear elastic fracture toughness which only uses the crack growth and the maximum load from the load versus displacement record. The final method substitutes a linear regression of the two J-R points on either side of the JQ line to determine the JQ point. Each alternative analysis was able to acquire J values with varying degrees of accuracy. The linear substitution was the most accurate. The first direct method using an area integral tended to over predict the true J value. The second direct method using a conversion formula had a tendency to under predict the true J value. None of these methods could substitute for the ASTM standard; however, each provided a usable estimate of elastic-plastic fracture toughness.
|
Page generated in 0.6199 seconds