Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 1931. / On cover: University of Pennsylvania. Bibliography: p. 146-159.

No description available.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Columbia University, 1939. / Vita.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Columbia University, 1939. / Vita.

Le lexique géographique de Stéphane de Byzance, appelé sous une forme abrégée Ethnika, rassemble les « géonymes » ayant une forme dérivée, suivant la définition des grammairiens antiques (ethnique, féminin, ktétique…). Il fait l’objet ici d’une relecture attentive, en analysant en particulier les taux de réduction variables suivant les parties de l’œuvre (divisée probablement à l’origine en 60 livres).L'analyse précise permet de déterminer plusieurs périodes d'agrégation des informations, la plus importante provenant d'un lexique-source daté des environs du milieu du IIe siècle de notre ère. L'étude du corpus des mentions se rapportant à l'Europe occidentale (moins l'Italie) permet d'affiner l'information remontant aux auteurs grecs et donne de nouvelles attributions à certaines mentions. Il est dès lors possible de mieux contextualiser les géonymes qui sont cités par Stéphane de Byzance. / The geographical lexicon of Stephen of Byzantium, called in abbreviated form Ethnika, brings together the "géonymes" with a derivative form, as defined by ancient grammarians (ethnic, female, ktetika ...). It is the subject here of a careful reading, analyzing in particular the variable reduction rate according to the parts of the work (probably originally divided into 60 books).The precise analysis identifies several periods aggregation of information, the most important from a source-lexicon dated around the middle of the second century AD. The study mentions the corpus relating to Western Europe (minus Italy) refines the information back to the Greek writers and gives new comprehension on certain information. It is therefore possible to better contextualize "géonymes" cited by Stephen of Byzantium.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 1980. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 1052-1070).

Doctorat en philosophie et lettres / info:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublished

This study identifies and describes constituents, patterns and distribution of the system –or systems- of demonstratives of a representative selection of early Greek dialects, namely the “Arcado-Cyprian” group: Arcadian and Cyprian, including a short analysis of Pamphylian as well as a discussion of the particle νι/νυ and a brief note on Mycenaean; the “Aeolic” group: Lesbian, Boeotian and Thessalian; and a selection of West Greek dialects, including both “Doric” and “Northwest Greek” dialects: Elean, Cretan, Laconian, Cyrenaean and Theran. It also examines, describes and compares the syntactic functions and, where possible, pragmatic uses of the series of demonstratives in operation in the selected dialects, providing a classification capable of accounting for all uses cross-dialectically, as well as a succinct account of the evolution of the system of demonstratives from Indo-European to “Ancient Greek”. Additionally, it offers a glimpse of the way in which deixis and anaphora seem to have worked in early Greek dialectal inscriptions, addressing the issue of defining demonstrative pronouns, as well as deixis and anaphora in general terms. Finally, this thesis provides the basis for a cross-dialectal comparison of the structure and operation of the different systems of demonstratives, and corrects some general misconceptions about the scope, usage and inter-dialectal connections of some series of demonstratives, particularly with regard to Arcadian and Cyprian. The results of such a study might contribute towards the discussion of the classification and history of the evolution of early Greek dialects.