Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder, characterized pathologically by a marked loss of dopaminergic nigrostriatal neurons and clinically by disabling movement disorders. PD can be treated by inhibiting monoamine oxidase (MAO), specifically MAO–B, since this is a major enzyme involved in the catabolism of dopamine in the substantia nigra of the brain. Inhibition of MAO–B may conserve the dopamine supply in the brain and may therefore provide symptomatic relief for PD patients. Selegiline is an irreversible MAO–B inhibitor and is currently used for the treatment of PD. Irreversible inhibitors inactivate enzymes by forming stable covalent complexes. The process is not readily reversed either by removing the remainder of the free inhibitor or by increasing the substrate concentration. Even dilution or dialysis does not dissociate the enzyme inhibitor complex and restore enzyme activity. From a safety point of view it may therefore be more desirable to develop reversible inhibitors of MAO–B. In this study, caffeine was used as lead compound to design, synthesize and evaluate new reversible inhibitors of MAO–B. This study is based on the finding that C–8 substituted caffeine analogues are potent MAO inhibitors. For example, (E)–8–(3–chlorostyryl)caffeine (CSC) is an exceptionally potent competitive inhibitor of MAO–B with an enzyme–inhibitor dissociation constant (Ki value) of 128 nM. In this study caffeine was similarly conjugated at C–8 to various side–chains. The effect that these chosen side–chains had on the MAO–B inhibition activity of C–8 substituted caffeine analogues will then be evaluated. The caffeine analogues were also evaluated as human MAO–A inhibitors. For the purpose of this study, saturated C–8 side chains were selected with the goal of discovering new C–8 side chains that enhance the MAO–A and ?B inhibition potency of caffeine. As mentioned above, the styryl side chain is one example of a side chain that enhances the MAO–B inhibition potency of caffeine. Should a side chain with promising MAO inhibition activity be identified in this study, the inhibition potency will be further optimized in a future study by the addition of a variety of substituents to the C–8 side chain ring. For example, halogen substitution of (E)–8– styrylcaffeine enhances the MAO–B inhibition potency by up to 10 fold. The saturated side chains selected for the present study included the phenylethyl (1), phenylpropyl (2), phenylbutyl (3) and phenylpentyl (4) functional groups. Also included are the cyclohexylethyl (8), 3–oxo–3– phenylpropyl (5), 4–oxo–4–phenylbutyl (6) moieties. A test compound containing an unsaturated linker between C–8 of caffeine and the side chain ring, the phenylpropenyl analogue 7, was also included. This study is therefore an exploratory study to discover new C–8 moieties that are favorable for MAO– inhibition. All the target compounds were synthesized by reacting 1,3–dimethyl–5,6–diaminouracil with an appropriate carboxylic acid in the presence of a carbodiimide dehydrating agent. Following ring closure and methylation at C–7, the target inhibitors were obtained. Inhibition potencies were determined using recombinant human MAO–A and MAO–B as enzyme sources. The inhibitor potencies were expressed as IC50 values. The most potent MAO–B inhibitor was 8–(5– phenylpentyl)caffeine (4) with an IC50 value of 0.656 ?M. In contrast, all the other test inhibitors were moderately potent MAO–B inhibitors. In fact the next best MAO–B inhibitor, 8–(4– phenylbutyl)caffeine (3) was approximately 5 fold less potent than 4 with an IC50 value of 3.25 ?M. Since the 5–phenylpentyl moiety is the longest side chain evaluated in this study, this finding demonstrates that longer C–8 side chains are more favorable for MAO–B inhibition. Interestingly, compound 5 containing a cyclohexylethyl side chain (IC50 = 6.59 ?M) was approximately 4 fold more potent than the analogue containing the phenylethyl linker (1) (IC50 = 26.0 ?M). This suggests that a cyclohexyl ring in the C–8 side chain of caffeine may be more optimal for MAO–B inhibition and should be considered in future studies. The caffeine analogues containing the oxophenylalkyl side chains (5 and 6) were weak MAO–B inhibitors with IC50 values of 187 ?M and 46.9 ?M, respectively. This suggests that the presence of a carbonyl group in the C–8 side chain is not favorable for the MAO–B inhibition potency of caffeine. The unsaturated phenylpropenyl analogue 7 was also found to be a relatively weak MAO–B inhibitor with an IC50 value of 33.1 ?M. In contrast to the results obtained with MAO–B, the test caffeine analogues were all weak MAOA inhibitors. With the exception of compound 5, all of the analogues evaluated were selective inhibitors of MAO–B. The most potent MAO–B inhibitor, 8–(5–phenylpentyl)caffeine (4) was the most selective inhibitor, 48 fold more potent towards MAO–B than MAO–A. This study also shows that two selected analogues (5 and 3) bind reversibly to MAO–A and ?B, respectively, and that the mode of MAO–A and –B inhibition is competitive for these representative compounds. / Thesis (M.Sc. (Pharmaceutical Chemistry))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2011.

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder, characterized pathologically by a marked loss of dopaminergic nigrostriatal neurons and clinically by disabling movement disorders. PD can be treated by inhibiting monoamine oxidase (MAO), specifically MAO–B, since this is a major enzyme involved in the catabolism of dopamine in the substantia nigra of the brain. Inhibition of MAO–B may conserve the dopamine supply in the brain and may therefore provide symptomatic relief for PD patients. Selegiline is an irreversible MAO–B inhibitor and is currently used for the treatment of PD. Irreversible inhibitors inactivate enzymes by forming stable covalent complexes. The process is not readily reversed either by removing the remainder of the free inhibitor or by increasing the substrate concentration. Even dilution or dialysis does not dissociate the enzyme inhibitor complex and restore enzyme activity. From a safety point of view it may therefore be more desirable to develop reversible inhibitors of MAO–B. In this study, caffeine was used as lead compound to design, synthesize and evaluate new reversible inhibitors of MAO–B. This study is based on the finding that C–8 substituted caffeine analogues are potent MAO inhibitors. For example, (E)–8–(3–chlorostyryl)caffeine (CSC) is an exceptionally potent competitive inhibitor of MAO–B with an enzyme–inhibitor dissociation constant (Ki value) of 128 nM. In this study caffeine was similarly conjugated at C–8 to various side–chains. The effect that these chosen side–chains had on the MAO–B inhibition activity of C–8 substituted caffeine analogues will then be evaluated. The caffeine analogues were also evaluated as human MAO–A inhibitors. For the purpose of this study, saturated C–8 side chains were selected with the goal of discovering new C–8 side chains that enhance the MAO–A and ?B inhibition potency of caffeine. As mentioned above, the styryl side chain is one example of a side chain that enhances the MAO–B inhibition potency of caffeine. Should a side chain with promising MAO inhibition activity be identified in this study, the inhibition potency will be further optimized in a future study by the addition of a variety of substituents to the C–8 side chain ring. For example, halogen substitution of (E)–8– styrylcaffeine enhances the MAO–B inhibition potency by up to 10 fold. The saturated side chains selected for the present study included the phenylethyl (1), phenylpropyl (2), phenylbutyl (3) and phenylpentyl (4) functional groups. Also included are the cyclohexylethyl (8), 3–oxo–3– phenylpropyl (5), 4–oxo–4–phenylbutyl (6) moieties. A test compound containing an unsaturated linker between C–8 of caffeine and the side chain ring, the phenylpropenyl analogue 7, was also included. This study is therefore an exploratory study to discover new C–8 moieties that are favorable for MAO– inhibition. All the target compounds were synthesized by reacting 1,3–dimethyl–5,6–diaminouracil with an appropriate carboxylic acid in the presence of a carbodiimide dehydrating agent. Following ring closure and methylation at C–7, the target inhibitors were obtained. Inhibition potencies were determined using recombinant human MAO–A and MAO–B as enzyme sources. The inhibitor potencies were expressed as IC50 values. The most potent MAO–B inhibitor was 8–(5– phenylpentyl)caffeine (4) with an IC50 value of 0.656 ?M. In contrast, all the other test inhibitors were moderately potent MAO–B inhibitors. In fact the next best MAO–B inhibitor, 8–(4– phenylbutyl)caffeine (3) was approximately 5 fold less potent than 4 with an IC50 value of 3.25 ?M. Since the 5–phenylpentyl moiety is the longest side chain evaluated in this study, this finding demonstrates that longer C–8 side chains are more favorable for MAO–B inhibition. Interestingly, compound 5 containing a cyclohexylethyl side chain (IC50 = 6.59 ?M) was approximately 4 fold more potent than the analogue containing the phenylethyl linker (1) (IC50 = 26.0 ?M). This suggests that a cyclohexyl ring in the C–8 side chain of caffeine may be more optimal for MAO–B inhibition and should be considered in future studies. The caffeine analogues containing the oxophenylalkyl side chains (5 and 6) were weak MAO–B inhibitors with IC50 values of 187 ?M and 46.9 ?M, respectively. This suggests that the presence of a carbonyl group in the C–8 side chain is not favorable for the MAO–B inhibition potency of caffeine. The unsaturated phenylpropenyl analogue 7 was also found to be a relatively weak MAO–B inhibitor with an IC50 value of 33.1 ?M. In contrast to the results obtained with MAO–B, the test caffeine analogues were all weak MAOA inhibitors. With the exception of compound 5, all of the analogues evaluated were selective inhibitors of MAO–B. The most potent MAO–B inhibitor, 8–(5–phenylpentyl)caffeine (4) was the most selective inhibitor, 48 fold more potent towards MAO–B than MAO–A. This study also shows that two selected analogues (5 and 3) bind reversibly to MAO–A and ?B, respectively, and that the mode of MAO–A and –B inhibition is competitive for these representative compounds. / Thesis (M.Sc. (Pharmaceutical Chemistry))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2011.

Charles University in Prague Faculty of Pharmacy in Hradec Králové Department of Biochemical Sciences Candidate: Bc. Pavla Martinková Supervisor: PharmDr. Anna Jirkovská, PhD. Title of diploma thesis: Antiproliferative activity of novel dexrazoxane analogues and their effect on antitumor effectiveness of anthracyclines Athracycline antibiotics (such as daunorubicin, doxorubicin or epirubicin) belong to the most common terapeutics of both solid tumors and hematological malignities. Unfortunately the serious and life-threatening adverse effect cardiotoxicity compromises their clinical usefulness. The only approved protection against anthracycline cardiotoxicity so far is dexrazoxane. Despite the outstanding cardioprotective ability, dexrazoxane use is very limited mainly due to its possible side effects. So we were directed towards synthesis of dexrazoxane analogues with better pharmacological properties. The aim of this diploma thesis was to assess the antiproliferative activity of novel analogues of both dexrazoxane (MK-15 and ES-5) and ADR-925 (JR-159 and KH- TA4) and their influence on the antiproliferative effectiveness of anthracyclines. Moreover, we aimed to study their chelating properties and their inhibition of the topoisomerase II in solution. We tested the antiproliferative activity of...

N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors are a subtype of receptors for major excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate in the central nervous system. Their activity is regulated by variety of allosteric modulators, including endogenous neurosteroids and their synthetic analogues. NMDAreceptor dysfunction is implicated in various forms of neurodegeneration and inhibitory neurosteroids have unique therapeutic potential to act as neuroprotective agens. The aim of this work is to investigate relationship between structure and function of neurosteroids with modifications in the D-ring region, using whole-cell patch clamp recording at recombinant GluN1/GluN2B receptors. In this work, we characterised inhibition effect of 19 neurosteroid analogues on NMDA receptor activity and found several of them to be potent NMDA receptor inhibitors. According to our results, there is a linear relationship of IC50 and lipophilicity of a neurosteroid compound, suggesting the plasma membrane plays an important role in neurosteroid access to NMDA receptor. Indeed, using capacitance recording configuration in combination with amphipathic molecule gamma-cyclodextrin, we were able to separate the kinetic of neurosteroid membrane binding from receptor binding. Moreover, these experiments showed that neurosteroid accumulation in the...

17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2) is a synthetic hormone, derivative of the natural hormone estradiol. EE2 is one of the the most prescribed drugs in the world. It belongs to the estrogenic endocrine disrupter chemicals. These compounds are able to alter functions of the endocrine system and cause adverse effects in the organism, offspring and (sub)population. In this thesis, there are observed effects of 17α-ethinylestradiol on enzyme activities of main enzymes involved in phase I of xenobiotic biotransformation, i.e. cytochromes P450 (CYP), in vitro. Isoforms of CYP subfamilies 1A, 2B, 2C, 2E and 3A were studied in rats and humans. Each CYP isoform was incubated with EE2 at two concentrations, 10μM EE2 and the concentration corresponding to the substrate concentration in the specific marker reactions of individual CYP isoforms. The results indicate, that in rat liver microsomes the activity of all studied isoforms except CYP1A2 was decreased in the presence of EE2. When EE2 was added to the incubation mixture at the concentration of the reaction substrate, the greatest decrease in enzyme activity was observed for CYP2C6, with the remaining activity only 36%. In human liver microsomes, the activity of CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2E1 and CYP3A4 was also effected by EE2. As in the case of rat model, CYP2C subfamily...

This thesis investigates the design, synthesis and biological assay of cysteine protease inhibitors within the papain superfamily of cysteine proteases. This is achieved by examining the effect of inhibitor design, especially warheads, on IC₅₀ values and structureactivity relationships between cysteine protease inhibitors of the papain superfamily. The representative proteases used are m-calpain, μ-calpain, cathepsin B and papain. Chapter One is an introductory chapter; Chapters Two-Four describe the design and synthesis of cysteine protease inhibitors; Chapter Five discusses assay protocol; and Chapter Six contains the assay results and structure-activity relationships of the synthesised inhibitors. Chapter One introduces cysteine proteases of the papain family and examines the structure, physiology and role in disease of papain, cathepsin B, m-calpain and μ-calpain. The close structural homology that exists between these members of the papain superfamily is identified, as well characteristics unique to each protease. Covalent reversible, covalent irreversible and non-covalent warheads are defined. The generic inhibitor scaffold of address region, recognition and warhead, upon which the inhibitors synthesised in this thesis are based, is also introduced. Chapter Two introduces reversible cysteine protease inhibitors found in the literature and that little is known about the effect of inhibitor warhead on selectivity within the papain superfamily. Oxidation of the dipeptidyl alcohols 2.6, 2.26, 2.29, 2.30, 2.35 and 2.36 utilising the sulfur trioxide-pyridine complex gave the aldehydes 2.3, 2.27, 2.19, 2.2, 2.21 and 2.22. Semicarbazones 2.37-2.40 were synthesised by a condensation reaction between the alcohol 2.3 and four available semicarbazides. The amidoximes 2.48 and 2.49 separately underwent thermal intramolecular cyclodehydration to give the 3-methyl-1,2,4- oxadiazoles 2.41 and 2.50. The aldehydes 2.3 and 2.27 were reacted with potassium cyanide to give the cyanohydrins 2.51 and 2.52. The cyanohydrins 2.51 and 2.52 were separately reacted to give 1) the α-ketotetrazoles 2.43 and 2.55; 2) the α-ketooxazolines 2.42 and 2.58; 3) the esterified cyanohydrins 2.60 and 2.61. A two step SN2 displacement reaction of the alcohol 2.6 to give the azide 2.62, an example of a non-covalent cysteine protease inhibitor. Chapter Three introduces inhibitors with irreversible warheads. The well-known examples of epoxysuccinic acids 3.1 and 3.5 are discussed in detail, highlighting the lack of irreversible cysteine protease specific inhibitors. The aldehydes 2.3 and 2.27 were reacted under Wittig conditions to give the α,β-unsaturated carbonyls 3.14-3.18. Horner- Emmons-Wadsworth methodology was utilised for the synthesis of the vinyl sulfones 3.20- 3.23. The dipeptidyl acids 2.24 and 2.28 were separately reacted with diazomethane to give the diazoketones 3.25 and 3.26. The diazoketones 3.25 and 3.26 were separately reacted with hydrogen bromide in acetic acid (33%) to give the α-bromomethyl ketones 3.27 and 3.28, which were subsequently reduced to give the α-bromomethyl alcohols 3.29-3.32. Under basic conditions the α-bromomethyl alcohols 3.29-3.32 ring-closed to form the peptidyl epoxides 3.33-3.36. Chapter Four introduces the disadvantages of peptide-based inhibitors. A discussion is given on the benefits of constraining inhibitors into the extended bioactive conformation known as a β-strand. Ring closing metathesis is utilised in the synthesis of the macrocyclic aldehyde 4.4, macrocyclic semicarbazone 4.15, the macrocyclic cyanohydrin 4.16, the macrocyclic α-ketotetrazole 4.18 and the macrocyclic azide 4.19. Chapter Five introduces enzyme inhibition studies. The BODIPY-casein fluorogenic assay used for establishing inhibitor potency against m-calpain and μ-calpain is validated. Assay protocols are also established and validated for cathepsin B, papain, pepsin and α- chymotrypsin. A discussion of the effect of solvent on enzyme activity is also included as part of this study. Chapter Six presents the assay results for all the inhibitors synthesised throughout this thesis and an extensive structure-activity relationship study between inhibitors is included. The alcohols 2.26 and 2.30 are unprecedented examples of non-covalent, potent, cathepsin B inhibitors (IC₅₀ = 0.075 μM selectivity 80-fold and 1.1 μM, selectivity 18-fold). The macrocyclic semicarbazone 4.15 is an unprecedented example of a potent macrocyclic cysteine protease inhibitor (m-calpain: IC₅₀ = 0.16 μM, selectivity 8-fold). The cyanohydrin 2.51 contains an unprecedented cysteine protease warhead and is a potent and selective inhibitor of papain (IC₅₀ = 0.030 μM, selectivity 3-fold). The O-protected cyanohydrin 2.61 is a potent and selective inhibitor of pepsin (IC₅₀ = 1.6 μM, selectivity 1.5-fold). The top ten warheads for potent, selective cathepsin B inhibition are: carboxylic acid, methyl ester, diazoketone, esterified cyanohydrin, α-bromomethyl ketone, α,β- unsaturated aldehyde, vinyl sulfones, α-bromomethyl-C₃-S,R-alcohol, alcohol and α,β- unsaturated ethyl ester. The selectivity of these warheads was between 5- and 130-fold for cathepsin B. The best inhibitors for cathepsin B were the α-bromomethyl ketone 3.26 (IC₅₀ = 0.075 μM, selectivity 16-fold), the α,β-unsaturated aldehyde 3.18 (IC₅₀ = 0.13 μM, selectivity 13-fold) and the esterified cyanohydrin 3.59 (IC₅₀ = 0.35 μM, selectivity 22- fold). Chapter Seven outlines the experimental details and synthesis of the compounds prepared in this thesis.

This thesis investigates the design, synthesis and biological assay of cysteine protease inhibitors within the papain superfamily of cysteine proteases. This is achieved by examining the effect of inhibitor design, especially warheads, on IC₅₀ values and structureactivity relationships between cysteine protease inhibitors of the papain superfamily. The representative proteases used are m-calpain, μ-calpain, cathepsin B and papain. Chapter One is an introductory chapter; Chapters Two-Four describe the design and synthesis of cysteine protease inhibitors; Chapter Five discusses assay protocol; and Chapter Six contains the assay results and structure-activity relationships of the synthesised inhibitors. Chapter One introduces cysteine proteases of the papain family and examines the structure, physiology and role in disease of papain, cathepsin B, m-calpain and μ-calpain. The close structural homology that exists between these members of the papain superfamily is identified, as well characteristics unique to each protease. Covalent reversible, covalent irreversible and non-covalent warheads are defined. The generic inhibitor scaffold of address region, recognition and warhead, upon which the inhibitors synthesised in this thesis are based, is also introduced. Chapter Two introduces reversible cysteine protease inhibitors found in the literature and that little is known about the effect of inhibitor warhead on selectivity within the papain superfamily. Oxidation of the dipeptidyl alcohols 2.6, 2.26, 2.29, 2.30, 2.35 and 2.36 utilising the sulfur trioxide-pyridine complex gave the aldehydes 2.3, 2.27, 2.19, 2.2, 2.21 and 2.22. Semicarbazones 2.37-2.40 were synthesised by a condensation reaction between the alcohol 2.3 and four available semicarbazides. The amidoximes 2.48 and 2.49 separately underwent thermal intramolecular cyclodehydration to give the 3-methyl-1,2,4- oxadiazoles 2.41 and 2.50. The aldehydes 2.3 and 2.27 were reacted with potassium cyanide to give the cyanohydrins 2.51 and 2.52. The cyanohydrins 2.51 and 2.52 were separately reacted to give 1) the α-ketotetrazoles 2.43 and 2.55; 2) the α-ketooxazolines 2.42 and 2.58; 3) the esterified cyanohydrins 2.60 and 2.61. A two step SN2 displacement reaction of the alcohol 2.6 to give the azide 2.62, an example of a non-covalent cysteine protease inhibitor. Chapter Three introduces inhibitors with irreversible warheads. The well-known examples of epoxysuccinic acids 3.1 and 3.5 are discussed in detail, highlighting the lack of irreversible cysteine protease specific inhibitors. The aldehydes 2.3 and 2.27 were reacted under Wittig conditions to give the α,β-unsaturated carbonyls 3.14-3.18. Horner- Emmons-Wadsworth methodology was utilised for the synthesis of the vinyl sulfones 3.20- 3.23. The dipeptidyl acids 2.24 and 2.28 were separately reacted with diazomethane to give the diazoketones 3.25 and 3.26. The diazoketones 3.25 and 3.26 were separately reacted with hydrogen bromide in acetic acid (33%) to give the α-bromomethyl ketones 3.27 and 3.28, which were subsequently reduced to give the α-bromomethyl alcohols 3.29-3.32. Under basic conditions the α-bromomethyl alcohols 3.29-3.32 ring-closed to form the peptidyl epoxides 3.33-3.36. Chapter Four introduces the disadvantages of peptide-based inhibitors. A discussion is given on the benefits of constraining inhibitors into the extended bioactive conformation known as a β-strand. Ring closing metathesis is utilised in the synthesis of the macrocyclic aldehyde 4.4, macrocyclic semicarbazone 4.15, the macrocyclic cyanohydrin 4.16, the macrocyclic α-ketotetrazole 4.18 and the macrocyclic azide 4.19. Chapter Five introduces enzyme inhibition studies. The BODIPY-casein fluorogenic assay used for establishing inhibitor potency against m-calpain and μ-calpain is validated. Assay protocols are also established and validated for cathepsin B, papain, pepsin and α- chymotrypsin. A discussion of the effect of solvent on enzyme activity is also included as part of this study. Chapter Six presents the assay results for all the inhibitors synthesised throughout this thesis and an extensive structure-activity relationship study between inhibitors is included. The alcohols 2.26 and 2.30 are unprecedented examples of non-covalent, potent, cathepsin B inhibitors (IC₅₀ = 0.075 μM selectivity 80-fold and 1.1 μM, selectivity 18-fold). The macrocyclic semicarbazone 4.15 is an unprecedented example of a potent macrocyclic cysteine protease inhibitor (m-calpain: IC₅₀ = 0.16 μM, selectivity 8-fold). The cyanohydrin 2.51 contains an unprecedented cysteine protease warhead and is a potent and selective inhibitor of papain (IC₅₀ = 0.030 μM, selectivity 3-fold). The O-protected cyanohydrin 2.61 is a potent and selective inhibitor of pepsin (IC₅₀ = 1.6 μM, selectivity 1.5-fold). The top ten warheads for potent, selective cathepsin B inhibition are: carboxylic acid, methyl ester, diazoketone, esterified cyanohydrin, α-bromomethyl ketone, α,β- unsaturated aldehyde, vinyl sulfones, α-bromomethyl-C₃-S,R-alcohol, alcohol and α,β- unsaturated ethyl ester. The selectivity of these warheads was between 5- and 130-fold for cathepsin B. The best inhibitors for cathepsin B were the α-bromomethyl ketone 3.26 (IC₅₀ = 0.075 μM, selectivity 16-fold), the α,β-unsaturated aldehyde 3.18 (IC₅₀ = 0.13 μM, selectivity 13-fold) and the esterified cyanohydrin 3.59 (IC₅₀ = 0.35 μM, selectivity 22- fold). Chapter Seven outlines the experimental details and synthesis of the compounds prepared in this thesis.

OBJECTIVE: Low level light therapy (LLLT) is being widely used in wound healing and pain relief, and its use is expected to be expanded rapidly to treatment of other disorders as well in a foreseeable future. However, before its expansion, the fear that LLLT could initiate or promote metastasis must be addressed thoroughly. As an initial effort towards this end, the current study evaluates the safety of LLLT in vitro using two different human cancer cell lines (Michigan Cancer Foundation-7 (MCF-7) and Jurkat E6-1) by determining the viability of cells after low level light (LLL) application while treatment under anti-cancer chemotherapeutic drugs (5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin) separately on each cell line. METHODS: Two human cancer cell lines (MCF-7 and Jurkat E6-1) were cultured throughout the experiments. Two different anti-cancer chemotherapeutic drugs (5-FU and cisplatin) were used to treat both cell lines. The half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of each drug on each cell line was determined by treating each cell line with varying concentrations of each drug. A total of 3 or 4 trials were done for each cell line with each drug, and the range of concentration was narrowed closer to the IC50 value at each successive trial. Once the IC50 concentrations were determined, each cell line was treated with 808 nm LLL at varying energy densities in a single dose using a light emitting diode (LED) source both in the absence and the presence of each drug at one IC50. A total of 3 or 5 trials were done for each cell line with each drug, and for each trial, six different energy densities ranging from 0 J/cm2 (control) to 10 J/cm2 were applied. The energy densities were varied for each trial with control always being used. After application of LLL, the viability of cells was determined, and three different 1-way ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) analyses were done to compare the viability of cells at each energy density to that of control. RESULTS: The IC50 of 5-FU in MCF-7 and Jurkat E6-1 cells was determined as 70 µM and 20 µM respectively. The IC50 of cisplatin in MCF-7 and Jurkat E6-1 cells was determined as 17 µM and 7 µM respectively. No significant difference (P > 0.05) in the viability of MCF-7 cells was observed between each group treated with different energy density of LLL and control group (0 J/cm2) both in the absence and the presence of 5-FU at IC50 (70 µM). No significant difference (P > 0.05) in the viability of MCF-7 cells was observed between each group treated with different energy density of LLL and control group (0 J/cm2) both in the absence and the presence of cisplatin at IC50 (17 µM). No significant difference (P > 0.05) in the viability of Jurkat E6-1 cells was observed between each group treated with different energy density of LLL and control group (0 J/cm2) both in the absence and the presence of 5-FU at IC50 (20 µM). However, a significant increase (0.01 < P < 0.05) in the viability of cells was observed when treating Jurkat E6-1 cells with 10 J/cm2 of LLL in the presence of cisplatin at IC50 (7 µM) compared to control group (0 J/cm2). Except for the comparison mentioned previously, no significant difference in the viability of Jurkat E6-1 cells was observed between each group treated with different energy density of LLL and control group (0 J/cm2) both in the absence and the presence of cisplatin at IC50 (7 µM). No definite trend in the viability of cells was observed with increasing energy density of LLL for each cell line either in the absence of the presence of each drug at IC50. CONCLUSIONS: The application of LLL at 808 nm with energy densities ranging from 0.1 J/cm2 to 10 J/cm2 under an LED source did not induce cell proliferation or death compared to control (0 J/cm2) for each cell line in the absence or the presence of each drug, and no definite trend was observed with increasing energy density. The study suggests that LLLT at these parameters may be safe to use on cancer patients, but further studies on different cancer cell lines and animal models with different parameters (wavelength, energy density, dosage) of LLL are warranted.

Charles University Faculty of Pharmacy in Hradec Králové Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology Student: Simona Hvolková Supervisor: PharmDr. Jana Ramos Mandíková, Ph.D. Title of diploma thesis: Cytotoxicity testing on 2D and 3D model of human liver cells. An inherent part of drug development are in vitro assays, which might be helpful in prediction of drug toxicity. Nowadays, the majority of assays use simple 2D structures for cell growth, but 3D structures with similar conditions to in vivo are becoming more popular. The goal of the study was to assess the cytotoxicity of selected xenobiotics in vitro by both 2D and 3D cell models. The research subjects were drugs from the group of antimycotics (amphotericin B, ketoconazole), NSAIDs (diclofenac, ibuprofen), antipyretics (paracetamol, fenacetine), sodium azide, tamoxifen, para-aminosalicylic acid, methanol and ethanol. For determination of cytotoxicity, the standard colorimetric method (CellTiter 96® ) based on reductive assessment of metabolic active cells was used. For drug testing it was used human standard line of liver cells HepG2. The cells were cultivated in monolayer or in 3D form with the Alvetex® Scaffold technology using high porous networked polystyrene. The parameter of inhibition concentration IC50 was chosen for toxicity assessment of...

Made available in DSpace on 2014-07-29T15:29:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Marcelo de sousa Vieira.pdf: 1862129 bytes, checksum: 7cc8be40ceb11c75c5ec56b362ffec29 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009-04-14 / The animal replacement in expirements has been very encouraged by government and other institutions. However, in drugs development the animal replacement is not yet a reality, like at oral acute systemic tests. The validation of in vitro protocols is necessary for data generation with reproducibility, repetability and accuracy. In this study was validated at the Laboratório de Farmacologia e Toxicologia Celular- Faculdade de Farmácia/Universidade Federal de Goiás the protocol already validated by three laboratories (two in the USA and one at United Kingdom) and coordinated by ICCVAM: In Vitro Cytotoxicity Methods for Estimating Starting Doses for Acute Systemic Toxicity Tests, using the neutral red uptake in BAL/c 3T3-A31 cell line. It was used the grandisine, a lignan, and its major metabolite taken by fungi biodegradation. Our research group has identified a potential anti-tumoral action of grandisine, data not yet published. After in house validation we estimated the LD50 of grandisin and 4-O-demethylgrandisin: 617.72 mg/kg and 429.95 mg/kg, respectively. Both were classified under the GSH category 4. / A substituição ou redução do uso de animais em experimentos para a avaliação de toxicidade tem sido bastante encorajada e tem recebido grandes incentivos, inclusive financeiros, governamentais e institucionais. No entanto, a substituição completa da maioria dos testes mandatórios por agências reguladoras do setor ainda não é realidade, a exemplo, o teste de toxicidade oral aguda sistêmica. Neste contexto, se aplica a validação de testes in vitro para estimar dados in vivo. No presente trabalho, realizamos a validação in house do protocolo internacional e multilaboratorial recomendado pelo Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM): Utilização da Citotoxicidade In Vitro na Estimativa de Doses Iniciais para Testes de Toxicidade Oral Aguda Sistêmica. Para tal, utilizamos o método de captação do corante vermelho neutro e a linhagem celular fibroblástica de camundongos BALB/c 3T3-A31. Dentre as substâncias recomendadas pelo ICCVAM para a validação do método foram investigadas 9 substâncias. A metabolização de produtos pelo organismo vivo é uma grande limitação dos testes in vitro. Utilizamos a grandisina, um tipo de ligana com grande potencial antitumoral e seu metabólito majoritário como substâncias modelos. Com utilização do metabólito conseguimos transpor esta barreira dos testes in vitro. Os resultados demonstraram que os dados obtidos estão em consonância com os dados da literatura sendo possível classificar ambas as substâncias na categoria GHS 4: grandisina e 4-Odemetilgrandisina: 617,72 mg/kg and 429,95 mg/kg, respectivamente.