Dans le cadre du débat sur la protection des indications géographiques (le choix entre système sui generis et système des marques), cette thèse vise à approfondir la réflexion sur le type de régime approprié aux besoins de la Chine. La question se pose : s'il est vrai que le système français et européen de protection sui generis des IG se base sur la notion de terroir, pourquoi ce type de protection a reçu un accueil assez froid de la part du gouvernement chinois, malgré le très grand nombre de « produits de terroir » qui se trouve dans ce pays ? Cette question nous amène à retracer l’histoire de l’émergence du système sui generis en Europe et sa transposition en Chine, à démontrer dans quelle mesure cette approche est appliquée en Chine, à illustrer le revers subi par la transposition, à analyser les raisons sous-jacentes à cet échec, et, enfin, à réfléchir aux options quant à l'avenir du système des IG en Chine. Nous proposons dès lors de réformer la législation chinoise, en privilégiant la protection sui generis, et en diminuant le rôle du système des marques dans la reconnaissance et la gestion des IG. / In the context of the debate on approach towards geographical indication protection (the choice between sui generis or trademark regime), this thesis aims to deepen the reflection on what approach is needed for China. It asks one question: if it is true that the concept of terroir underpins the French and European sui generis regime of GIs, why does the sui generis regime, when transplanted in China, gets only a cold reception, despite of the fact that China is endowed with a large number of products with a strong tradition and anchored in the terroir of their place of origin? This question leads us to: retrace the history of how the notion of GIs, along with the sui generis laws governing them, emerged in Europe and was transplanted to China; demonstrate the extent to which the European approach is adopted in China, through conducting a comparative study of the laws in France, the EU and China; show the setback that the transplanted sui generis regime has suffered; analyze the reasons leading to this setback; and finally, loot at the option of the future of China’s sui generis regime. Our suggestion is that the status quo of the sui generis regime needs changing. China should give clear preference to the sui generis regime, as opposed to the regime of collective and certification marks.

Texte remanié de: Oxford M. Litt. thesis--Oxford, 1984. / Bibliogr. p. IX-X. Index.

Diss.--Universität Zürich, 1991. / Bibliogr. p. 226-240.

Thesis (MSc)--University of Stellenbosch, 2007. / Bibliography. Also available via the Internet.

Methadone hydrochloride is an old drug that has been in vogue off and on. It has complex pharmacodynamics and can be potentially fatal in inexperienced settings. Drug switching from an opioid to methadone or vice versa requires knowledge of equianalgesic dosing. It is critical when using the drug to monitor for signs and symptoms of toxicity so that overdosing or toxicity can be identified in a timely manner. This review discusses these important topics so that methadone can be used safely and effectively.

This thesis explores the historical evolution of the nature of the link between a product and its place of origin in the European sui generis systems of GI protection, with a specific focus on the EU Regulation 1151/2012 on Geographical Indications for the protection of agricultural products and foodstuffs. It concludes that this link has substantively changed, since the 1930s, when some early forms of sui generis GI systems were introduced in southern Europe, especially in France and Italy. While these regimes were based exclusively on the concept of terroir, a cipher for the physical link between a product and a place, an empirical analysis carried out in the present work reveals that, today, the history of the product and of its method of production is, statistically, the predominant linking factor. Furthermore, the research shows that the historical link is almost always mentioned in the specifications of EU GI products, when protected both by Protected Designations of Origin (PDO) or Protected Geographical Indications (PGI), which are the two quality schemes provided by EU Law. In particular, the terroir element, which characterises PDOs, also appears frequently in PGI specifications, where it should be superfluous, thus suggesting that the differences between these two quality schemes are unclear. Finally, the emergence of the historical element confirms that GIs can contribute to the protection of products that are linked to a geographical area not by physical and environmental factors, but by the socio-cultural traditions of a specific place. Although history can constitute a valid product/link, however, it must be used with caution, as it can be mystified and reconstructed in an arbitrary and unfounded way. This is dangerous, because it can turn GIs into a mere marketing tool, thus damaging the origin function that distinguishes them from the broad family of quality labels.

Geographers have investigated agri-foods, commodity chains, 'alternative' food networks, 'local' production, and multicultural cuisine. However, the relationship between food, place, boundaries, environmental determinism, and authenticity remains under-researched. This thesis seeks to redress this deficiency with a detailed study of the construction of the Protected Food Names (PFN) scheme in the UK. PFNs are a type of Intellectual Property (IP) and form the European component of the international Geographical Indications (GI) system. These place-based foods and drinks originate from defined and bounded areas and are produced in supposedly traditional ways. Their manufacturers consider them unreplicable outside the protected zone. This qualitative investigation of three PFNs – Melton Mowbray Pork Pies, Stilton Cheese, and Grimsby Traditional Smoked Fish – critiques the ways in which ideas of place, boundaries, and authenticity are invoked by producers. The thesis interrogates how manufacturers understand place and its boundedness, employ supposedly 'objective' historical evidence, and apply the ambiguous notion of authenticity to stabilise and sustain local practices. The study also examines the strategies deployed to generate consumer interest in an era where uniqueness is an important marker of value. This work thus introduces a different conceptual angle to accounts of the PFN structure which primarily privilege legal or economistic assessments. It aims instead to deconstruct the geographical concepts on which the PFN edifice is based. The ultimate aim is to draw attention to the vagaries inherent in the increasingly hegemonic GI model. This research connects with geographical debates about the construction of place and boundaries, the social production of authenticity, the role of selective historical 'facts' in the development of narratives about place, and the 'selling' of location and its products. It therefore provides a lens through which the foundations and everyday operation of the GI system can be profitably analysed.

Global food production, supply chains, and food quality are coming under increasing scrutiny by consumers, environmentalists and governments. Particularly in developed countries, there is growing awareness among consumers about food origins and environmental practices. There are increasing concerns over animal welfare and protection and due to food scares in the late 1990’s, and more recently contamination issues from additives within supply chains and food borne illness outbreaks in Europe. It is no surprise then that food safety and traceability matters have become an issue of public and governmental concern. There is much debate currently about globalisation of the international trade of food commodities. There is also a growing awareness about and changing attitudes towards the provenance of consumers’ food sources. This dichotomy provides the background argument to this thesis. Europe has long been considered the home of finely crafted cheeses and this thesis aims to examine how the use of Geographical Indications (GI’s) by the European Union (EU) can influence New Zealand made speciality cheeses. The EU system of GI’s and the protection of specialised food and agricultural products has enabled companies to build strong reputations in the global marketplace and also within the internal market in order to charge premium prices for these protected products. The vast majority of the world’s GI foods are located in Europe. This thesis aims to argue that while there is not an official system for the control of labels of origin for the names of speciality cheeses in New Zealand, they are used nonetheless. These labels of location are used to denote certain qualities, production methods or guarantee and differ from standardised, commoditised cheeses. This thesis discusses the use of GI’s in the cheese industry as a way for New Zealand cheese producers to create product differentiation and as a means of communicating product quality through provenance branding. This thesis uses qualitative research methods to gauge industry opinion regarding the nature of the speciality cheese industry in New Zealand in order to better understand the reasons for naming speciality cheese products and how European cheeses have influenced them. Findings indicate that naming and influences for these products are varied and complex, but have been ultimately influenced by European cheeses. For New Zealand cheese companies GI’s are used as a means to differentiate products from competitors.

Thesis (M.A.)--Georgia State University, 2006. / Title from title screen. Lesley Reid, committee chair; Wendy Simonds, Dawn Baunach, committee members. Electronic text (80 p.) : digital, PDF file. Description based on contents viewed June 18, 2007. Includes bibliographical references (p. 66-74).

Diss. : Philosophie : Münster, Westf. : 1980, soutenue sous le titre--"Literarische und dramaturgische Informationswerte von Bühnenanweisungen--Shakespeares First Folio und die vorausgehenden Quartoversionen" / Bibliogr. p. 296-316. Index. Résumé en anglais.