Spelling suggestions: "subject:"informationstorage"" "subject:"informationslage""
61 |
Distributed development of a logic-based controlled medical terminologyCampbell, Keith Eugene. January 1997 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Stanford University, 1997.
|
62 |
The Integration of Cadastral Base Mapping with Cadastral Parcel AttributionWurm, Kurt B. January 2003 (has links) (PDF)
No description available.
|
63 |
Design of a large data base a methodology comparisonWilson, James R January 2010 (has links)
Typescript (photocopy). / Digitized by Kansas Correctional Industries
|
64 |
Imaging technology and its strategic applications in organizations in Hong KongWong, Tak-sing, Andy, 黃德成 January 1994 (has links)
published_or_final_version / Business Administration / Master / Master of Business Administration
|
65 |
Group decision support systems vs. face-to-face communication for collaborative group work: An experimental investigation.Easton, George Kurtis January 1988 (has links)
Organizations must consider increasing their decision-making capabilities in order to remain viable in a post-industrial society that Huber characterized as having "more and increasing knowledge, more and increasing complexity, and more and increasing turbulence" (1984). He sees the challenge for managers in the post-industrial environment as learning to make decisions in less time using greater quantities of more complex information. Group Decision Support Systems (GDSSs) represent a computer-based technology that has the potential to increase an organization's decision-making capabilities, and to meet this post-industrial challenge. This dissertation investigated a specific GDSS to study how GDSS technology affects group decision making compared to the more traditional face-to-face group decision making. The research was conducted through the use of a laboratory study comparing face-to-face groups of size six to GDSS groups of the same size. The decision process was the same for both types of groups, i.e., the sequence of steps used to solve the problem was consistent for both. Additionally, all of the groups were given the same task. Process and decision outcomes were measured for the six sets of treatments considered feasible for the manipulation of the communication condition, leadership, and anonymity. The process outcomes included satisfaction, time to decision, consensus, participation and uninhibited comments. The quality of a group's decision was the decision outcome measurement. The major findings of this study are: (1) Decision quality was equivalent for both face-to-face and GDSS groups; (2) Time to decision was greater for GDSS; (3) Consensus was less likely to occur in GDSS groups; (4) Satisfaction was lower in GDSS groups; (5) Participation was more equitable in GDSS groups.
|
66 |
Transformation-based approach to resolving data heterogeneityBychkov, Yury Alexandrovich. 10 April 2008 (has links)
No description available.
|
67 |
Computerised information system in social work practice with reference to a child and family welfare society09 February 2015 (has links)
M.A. / Please refer to full text to view abstract
|
68 |
A comparison of relational and network data base representations of a medical repository systemBoswell, Paula S January 2010 (has links)
Typescript, etc. / Digitized by Kansas Correctional Industries
|
69 |
An interactive bibliographic reference systemMiller, Kathleen Ann January 2010 (has links)
Typescript (photocopy). / Digitized by Kansas Correctional Industries
|
70 |
A retrieval system for land use planning informationWiller, Robert Howard January 2010 (has links)
Digitized by Kansas Correctional Industries
|
Page generated in 0.1048 seconds