Spelling suggestions: "subject:"judgment""
1 |
Wesen, Wirken und Beseitigung des gerichtlichen Anerkenntnisses /Borckert, Paul. January 1930 (has links)
Thesis (doctoral)--Universität Breslau.
|
2 |
Ansprüche gegenüber materiell unrichtigen Urteilen /Dopatka, Hans-Heinrich. January 1900 (has links)
Thesis (doctoral)--Universität Breslau.
|
3 |
Das Erschlichene urteil unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Rechtsprechung des Reichsgerichts ...Herrnstadt, Hans. January 1933 (has links)
Inaug.-diss.--Freiburg im Breisgau. / Cover title. Lebenslauf. "Literaturverzeichnis": pp. xixiii.
|
4 |
Enforcement of foreign claims and judgments against military personnel in the United StatesBraun, Walter D. January 1900 (has links)
Thesis (LL. M.)--Judge Advocate General's School, U.S. Army, 1957. / "May 1957." Typescript. Includes bibliographical references. Also issued in microfiche.
|
5 |
Die Feststellungsklage im schweizerischen Recht /Bachmann, Max. January 1900 (has links)
Thesis (doctoral)--Universität Zürich.
|
6 |
Die Gesinnungsstrafe der Modernen /Lenert, Rudolf. January 1911 (has links)
Thesis (doctoral)--Universität München 1911. / Includes bibliographical references (p. [91]-93).
|
7 |
Towards an integrated theory of natural lawToddington, S. W. January 1989 (has links)
No description available.
|
8 |
De la nature et de la portée des décisions judiciaires en matière gracieuse ...Henry, Andre. January 1913 (has links)
Thèse--Université de Nancy. / "Bibliographie": 3d prelim. leaf.
|
9 |
De l'autorité que possèdent en France les jugements étrangers rendus en matière civile et en matière commerciale ...Cabannes, Albert. January 1914 (has links)
Thèse--Université de Nancy. / "Bibliographie": p. [127]-128.
|
10 |
Probability and conviction -- irreconcilable concepts or two sides of the same coin? : a comparative analysis of the standard of proof in civil mattersBrinkmann, Christian Moritz January 2003 (has links)
This thesis questions the widespread proposition that the civilian standard of proof in civil matters is considerably higher than the corresponding standard in the Common Law. Instead, it is argued here that the "odd differences" in the formulae employed to describe it "are merely a matter of words". / Conceptually, both legal traditions combine the subjective element of a belief in the truth with the objective requirement of warrant for this belief in the evidence presented. The trier's belief that a certain statement is true has to be reasonably inferable from the evidence. In both traditions the standard is not fixed in the sense that it depends on a variety of factors relevant to the specific case, such as whether evidence is amply available, or whether only testimonial evidence can be adduced. / This approach to the standard of proof is also followed by the Principles and Rules for Transnational Civil Procedure developed in 2002 by the American Law Institute (ALI) and UNIDROIT. Their treatment of the standard of proof appears to be a synthesis of the Common and Civil Law approaches.
|
Page generated in 0.0657 seconds